463 words - 2 pages
How to Get out of Jury Duty
The mailman delivers good news and bad news. Topping the “bad news” list for many people who live in Los Angeles is a jury summons. This document tells you that you must respond by mail or phone for possible service on a jury. Many people feel that jury duty is a boring chore and would prefer not doing it. In fact, court clerks say that the most common question they hear is: Why do I have to serve? The official response is: Jury duty is a responsibility that all qualified citizens must share. If you are a citizen, if you can read and understand English, if you’re over 18 years old, and if you’re not a felon, you are eligible for jury duty. If you ignore the
296 words - 2 pages
Elvis Fabian 5/9/15
SMGH Class 8-2
Document Based Essay
During the years 1860 to 1900, the United States went through a period of industrial power known as the Second Industrial Revolution. With the help
of industrial leaders , Andrew Carnagie and John D. Rockefeller , along with an abundance of natural resources they were able to change the way people traveled and worked in the U.S.
Andrew Carnagie had control of the steel industry while
641 words - 3 pages
jurors represent the microcosm that is American Society.
For the duration of the text, each juror is only identified by a number with no evidence to suggest that they even know each other’s' names. The jury however, is a cross-section of American society as it comprises of educated, old, working-class, business and even immigrant men. This is intended by the play as the value of each juror is as a social representation, not as individuals. The 8th Juror represents possible strengths of the jury system as an aspect of the legal system. This is demonstrated by his confidence and the fact that he does not fear the idea of 'stand alone' against a potentially unanimous 'guilty' verdict, as he
8998 words - 36 pages
An Enron Jury Free of Grudges? Easy, Judge Says!
HOUSTON, Jan. 29, 2006 Chances are that in this city's pool of 2.3 million registered voters, there are at least 16 people who are not angry about the implosion of Enron, the largest business collapse in history. But ﬁnding them in a single day could be a challenge.! That has not deterred Judge Simeon T. Lake III of Federal District Court, who will begin the much-anticipated criminal trial of the former Enron chief executives Kenneth L. Lay and Jeffrey K. Skilling on Monday.! Judge Lake said in court on Thursday that he expected to choose a panel of 12 jurors and 4 alternates from 100 prospective members in one day. After examining
463 words - 2 pages
According to this appeals court, what errors were made by the judge at trial?
First off, the judge was wrong by allowing the jury to even deliver a verdict on discrimination claims against Thiesing for 2,200,000 dollars. Thiesing was the prosecutor and this case was not about what Thiesing did as he was the prosecutor and brought the case to court not the defendant. I feel as though the judge should have kept the jury on track by not allowing other issues not relevant to the case at hand to be admissible. On the other hand the judge also did not allow the jury to look at the evidence of the case with a clear mind due to the plaintiff’s counsel only desire was to ignite
261 words - 2 pages
undergo some physiological therapy, but the actual treatment varies according to the state. Another difference between the two pleas is that there is more than one form of the guilty but mentally ill defense. This is the defense of the irresistible impulse. This defense asserts that the defendant was suffering from a mental disease that that made him or her incapable of controlling his or her actions, despite being able to distinguish right and wrong at the time that the act was committed. For both pleas, sanity is determined by the judge or jury in a separate preceding in some states. In other states, the defense is either accepted or rejected in the verdict of the judge or jury. Even if either one of these defenses lead to a verdict of guilty, the sentencing court may consider it a mitigating factor.
1914 words - 8 pages
in a federal or state prison if the current racial disparity continues” (Mauer, 2004, p. 79).
Four reasons of Racial Disparity
The four reasons for the flourishing continuance of racial disparity in the criminal justice sentencing process are ineffective assistance of procedural bars, and council, jury selection and venue, prosecutorial discretion, and juror racism (Tabak, 1999, p. 6). Research documenting states like New York and California prosecutions have board spectrums concerning discretion seeking capital punishment; however, these four reasons apply to cases, which capital punishment is sought. “Capital punishment can be sought for intentional murders which individual may
914 words - 4 pages
hospitals and/or physicians for medical malpractice and a jury would decide how much the patient would be awarded after hearing all the evidence and if the jury found the doctor or hospital guilty for negligence. Since then physicians and insurance companies have fought through legislation to put a cap on what the jury could award the people in Florida. Florida’s current law for non-economic damages ranges from $500,000 and $ 1,500,000. This law has yet to be decided on constitutionally because the provisions of the law hits the poor and elderly the hardest according to the Florida healthcare law blog (Navin & Kelley, 2014).
Insurance companies and physicians are hoping these caps can
774 words - 4 pages
Blue Cross v. Marshfield
Blue Cross/Blue Shield v. Marshfield
Jury and Government Findings……………………………………………...page 2
Concepts Relevant to this Case……………………………………………...page 3
Blue Cross v. Marshfield
The Marshfield clinic is a health care system founded in 1916 comprised largely in Wisconsin (Marshfieldclinic.org, 2012). It has 2 hospitals, 53 community care centers, and has about 800 physicians in more than 80 medical specialties and subspecialties-from cardiology, to neurology, to
613 words - 3 pages
or detainee before the court to determine if the imprisonment is lawful. An individual cannot be held
for more than a certain amount of time and not be formally charged with a crime.
One of the most important rights of a person who is being charged with a serious crime is the right to a jury trial. Persons who have been accused of a crime have the right to prove their guilt or innocence determined by a group of fellow citizens. By adding the wisdom and judgment of others, law enforcement and the judicial system are kept in check. Though trial by jury is guaranteed by the Constitution, persons accused of a crime can waive their right to jury
When a person is arrested
385 words - 2 pages
. Constitution are known as:
7) Jury instructions are directions given to the jury by the:
8) Criminal liability is the degree of ____________ assigned to a defendant by a criminal court.
9) The basic parts or components of a crime are referred to as the ________ of the crime:
10) In the criminal law, ________ is considered behavior and the accompanying mental state.
11) The Latin term for "guilty act" is:
12) The Model Penal Code outline four ________: purposely, knowingly, reckless, and negligent.
13) Ray insults Bob. Bob then beats Ray up to get revenge. Bob's action is:
14) Knowing behavior is action undertaken with:
15) The term scienter
1717 words - 7 pages
enforced because he entered into it under circumstances of fraud and misrepresentation. Mr. Kruse also argued that the compensation agreement should not be enforced because he lacked sufficient mental capacity because he was mentally retarded and suffered from posttraumatic psychoneurosis as a result of the accident. Additionally, Mr. Kruse accused his employer of common law negligence and violating the Employers’ Liability Act. In the trial court, the jury found in favor of Coos Head Timber Company. Mr. Kruse then appealed his case to the Supreme Court of Oregon.
In the trial, Elsie Marks testified on behalf of Coos Head Timber Company as to the circumstances under which the
436 words - 2 pages
224 Week 5 Learning Team Letter to Friend Explaining Court Processes
CJA 224 Week 5 Individual Restorative Justice Paper
CJA 224 Week 5 Learning Team Letter to Friend Explaining Court Processes
CJA 224 Week 1 DQ 1 (UOP)
FOR MORE CLASSES VISI
What is the difference between the adversarial system of justice and the inquisitorial systems of justice that have been used in the past?
CJA 224 Week 1 DQ 2 (UOP)
FOR MORE CLASSES VISI
How did the right to a jury trial develop? What implications does the right to a jury trial have in
1003 words - 5 pages
case proceeds to sentencing directly because the criminal has already confessed to the crime. In the case that the defendant pleads not guilty, the defendant then proceeds to plead his/her case in front of a jury, presecutor and then the judge makes the final verdict. The jury ultimately decides whether the defendand is innocent or guilty based on the evidence, witnesses, and facts. Once the jury makes a decision, the judge then determines the punishment for the defendant based on the crime. Finally, the last element is corrections. Depending on the punishment, the defendant could face jail time or maybe probation for a given amount of years. Furthermore, defendents that are sentenced to
692 words - 3 pages
defined “as the process of bringing, maintaining and defending a law suit”. (Cheeseman, 2010). In a traditional litigation system the decision of the disputes are decided by a judge or jury whereas in a nontraditional litigation system or ADR the decision of the dispute rests in the hands of third party, who assists the disputing parties to come to a decision. In ADRs, depending on the method used, the third parties can be arbitrators, mediators, judicial referees, conciliators. (Cheeseman,2010). Hence, in both forms of litigation, there always a third party making the final decision. Plaintiffs and defendants usually can be used by attorneys in both litigation forms; however ,this is not
710 words - 3 pages
manner to be prescribed by law.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or persons to be seized.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same
915 words - 4 pages
Crime and Punishment
Colorado Technical University
The 5th amendment of the United States Constitution says introduces us to the double jeopardy clause. It is stated that no defendant shall stand trial more than once for the same charge brought against them. A defendant is put in jeopardy as soon as the jury is sworn in. If the case is dismissed then a new trial may be deemed necessary. Double jeopardy protects defendants only for retrials brought within the first jurisdiction; this meaning a defendant can be tried in federal court after being tried in state court. The double jeopardy clause will give the defendant a guarantee that they will not
3409 words - 14 pages
7. Attitude of 12 members in jury:
JUROR 1 (DEEPAK KEJRIWAL)
1. Co-coordinator, non-partial during the proceedings, facilitator, mediator, soft spoken and believed in democratic decisions with everyone’s consent.
2. A good moderator but he lacked control over the group Because of this; his role was not taken seriously by others
3. He kept his cool throughout the discussion and never fought with anyone and seeks co-operation from others. He is social as he tried to bring everybody to the table and maintained amiable relationship with everyone , interaction with strangers is most as his soft skills are very polished.
JUROR 2 (AMITABH SRIVASTAVA)
1. He is shy by nature,convinced and
605 words - 3 pages
was truly insane and only a mentally deranged individual would commit such distasteful lurid acts. Jeff Dahmer took the words insanity to the whole next level. The jury was forced to hear the Dahmer’s outlandish acts towards the victims. For instance how Dahmer kept his apartment crammed up with skeletons, 11 skulls, packages of genitals, and preserved and frozen hearts, muscles, and innards from his 17 slaughtered victims. Dahmer convinced himself that his acts were not sadistic but merely acts of enjoyment. The jury was left in disgust they felt though they were in a funeral and not at a trial for murder charges.
The court rejected his plea of insanity and sentenced Dahmer to fifteen
2207 words - 9 pages
schedules of the payment of specified sums for for certain wrongs. Earliest were laws of Ethelbert of kent (602 ad) - Ex. If an ear is cut 6 schillings shall be paid as compensation. Measures were meant to curtail Anglo saxon practice of a blood feud ( right of a victim or family wronged to retaliate in kind against perp. or his family). The menu of costs were used to avoid bargaining or haggling between sides to prevent violence. Nationwide survey of post conquest landholding was compiled, using procedures that foreshadowed the jury system instituted in the assize of Claredon. Royal officers from central government were sent to the localities, where groups of local men were summoned to meet
645 words - 3 pages
jury not to focus on the merits of the law, but instead consider the violation perpetuated. The case was determined and Scopes was found guilty. Consequently, he was fined $100. However, the supreme court of Tennessee overturned the ruling on technical grounds. It argued that the judge had passed the amount of fine instead of the jury. In 1967, the same court annulled the law.
Scopes trial represented a clash of faith and science. It led to two important conclusions that people have a right to scientific inquiry and academic freedom.
465 words - 2 pages
instructed the jury that Wade could make out an Eighth Amendment violation only by showing "physical abuse of such base, inhumane and barbaric proportions as to shock the sensibilities.” (Smith v Wade). The judge also informed the jury that Wade was able to receive punitive damages if the guards were guilty of egregious failure to protect “a flagrant or remarkably bad failure to protect” (Smith v Wade).
The courts ruled in favor of Wade, stating that Smith and the other guards were indeed guilty of negligence and providing proper protection for Wade. There were some dissenting opinions by several of the judges because they questioned whether or not there was malicious intent from
1089 words - 5 pages
rule did not substantiate dismissal of the case. In the year 2005, Christoff won the case against Nestle USA Inc. by verdict of the jury for appropriation of likeness and received an aggregate $15 million in damages. However, Nestle USA Inc. won their appeal against Christoff after the California Court of Appeal reversed the trial court judgment of $15 million compensation in damages in its entirety. California Appeal court based appeal on the interpretation of single publication rule and the application of the two-year statute of limitation against Russell’s claim to tort.
The primary focus of the case was to answer the question; is it possible to revoke Christoff’s claim of
968 words - 4 pages
* Deposition is taken, which is oral testimony given prior to the trial
* Interrogatories are written questions given by one party to the other
* Production of documents are all of the documents that are secured by one party for use at trial
* Settlement conference: a hearing before trial to facilitate a settlement
* Jury selection using process of voir dire
* Opening statements given by each party
* Plaintiff’s case: has the burden of proof to persuade trier of fact on the merits of the case
* Defendant’s case: rebuts plaintiff’s case; offers affirmative defenses; or proves allegations alleged in the cross complaint
717 words - 3 pages
We see different views, different opinions of men such as altruism, egoism, good and evil. It is no doubt that human beings possess either one or any of these characteristics, which make them unique. our actions, beliefs, and choices separate us from animals and non-livings. The quote which was said by Maya Angelou states that “Prejudice is a burden that confuses the past, threatens the future and renders the present inaccessible.” We saw prejudice and stereotype from jury # 3 when he discriminates and assume that the boy was guilty because of his background and ethnic. Everyone deserve a
2123 words - 9 pages
innocent people have been released from death row, after the evidence that sentenced them to death was found to be inaccurate. Many of these innocent people were victims of wrongful convictions based on confused witnesses, mistakes by lawyers and inaccurate forensics, while the person actually responsible for the crime was still free.
Cases involving DNA evidence in court, such as Ray Krone's case, can be denied access even if life and death are on the ropes. Found guilty, Krone was sentenced to death for rape and murder in Arizona, even though DNA found on the victim did not correlate with his. Arizona argued that no submission of DNA evidence could interfere with the jury decision. A
2378 words - 10 pages
THE FORD PINTO CASE
The scandal and the trial
On August 10, 1978, a tragic automobile accident occurred on U.S. Highway 33 near Goshen, Indiana. Sisters Judy
and Lynn Ulrich (ages 18 and 16, respectively) and their cousin Donna Ulrich (age 18) were struck from the rear in
their 1973 Ford Pinto by a van. The gas tank of the Pinto ruprured, the car burst into flames and the three teenagers were burned to death.
Subsequently an Elkhart County grand jury returned a criminal homicide charge against Ford, the first ever against
an American corporation. During the following 20-week trial, Judge Harold R. Staffeld advised the jury that Ford
should be convicted of reckless homicide if it were
1110 words - 5 pages
Assignment #3: Employment Laws and Strategy
Feb 17, 2013
Prof. Kenneth Lewis
Employment Laws and Strategy
Describe the scenario that you have selected and its corresponding employment laws.
Benefit decreases for the entire employee population.
There are several laws that influence benefits in the state of Maryland. From the website www.md.gov, fringe benefits include minimum wage, overtime, meals and breaks, vacation, holidays, sick leave, jury duty, severance, medical/hospitalization coverage, dental coverage and pension and retirement plans. The laws for the state of Maryland do not require that employers offer all of these benefits. Employers are
361 words - 2 pages
that they are worst of being left of the hook. I did hear something about domestic violence I just didn’t know who it was against. Alor of the people there seem to be involved with this case, or that they knew the defendant. This wasn’t a jury trial, the judge made the decision. The mother had stated that he had been left of the hook that she felt the court wasn’t taking this serious. The judge then told the mother that they are taking this serious that he is just making judgments according to the crime. The defendants lawyer said that he deserve another chance
407 words - 2 pages
consequences of the crime they committed. According to, www.thelawdictionary.org, “to be considered legally incompetent you have to have a psychological evaluation by a medical practitioner conducted.” (www.thelawdictionary.org). Like Szasz explained, every psychologis
t is going to have different ways of declaring whether or not a person is legally incompetent. As far as I am concerned, a person could easily lie to the psychologist that is evaluating them to make them think they are incompetent or mentally ill, especially if they know they are being evaluated for a jury trial. Personally, I am opposed to the notion of mental illness because I feel a large amount of our population
395 words - 2 pages
Inequality for All is a 2013 documentary film directed by Jacob Kornbluth. The film examines widening income inequality in the United States. The film is presented by American economist, author and professor Robert Reich. The film premiered at the 2013 Sundance Film Festival in the Documentary Competition section, and won a U.S. Documentary Special Jury Award for Achievement in Filmmaking.
Reich distills the story through the lens of widening income inequality—currently at historic highs—and explores what effects this increasing gap has not only on the U.S. economy but also American democracy itself. At the heart of the film is a simple question: What is a good society and what
744 words - 3 pages
party. Usually with ADR, the parties have their dispute mediated by a person who is an expert in the relevant field. This form of non-traditional litigation has gained popularity and even is required of some parties before their cases are permitted to be tried. ADR is very effective in such legal disputes as divorce, professional liability cases, person injury situations, etc.
Some advantages of using ADR can be that they are less formal and less intimidating, quicker to come to a resolution, less expensive, no jury is involved and results are confidential. While some disadvantages can be that there is no guaranteed resolution, arbitration decisions are final, may not be effective if there
830 words - 4 pages
important part of the justice system. It allows cases to be reviewed and heard again. The process gives reduces the chances that an innocent person from going to prison. A jury from a trial court can fail to fully analysis the evidence presented and make their decision based on that. Having a judge from the appellate courts make the decision of a case, can be better for a defendant, because they are much more knowledgeable than a regular citizen chosen for jury trial. I live in New Jersey and based on my research the New Jersey Courts are doing a good job in giving the cases submitted for appeal a chance to be heard in a timely manner. I think that it is important to not delay a case from
3975 words - 16 pages
Scrushy of inflating earnings to the tune of $1.4 billion since 1999. In November 2003, a federal grand jury indicted Scrushy on 85 counts including conspiracy, securities fraud, money laundering and charges related to overstating HealthSouth’s earnings by nearly $3.0 billion. According to federal investigators, the company overstated earnings to meet analysts’ earning estimates, while hiding the accounting fraud from the auditors. However, questions were raised whether the auditors failed to find or simply overlooked the fraud at HealthSouth. Central to the investigation was the issue of what role Scrushy played in “cooking the books.” However, as the case unfolded, it highlighted many other
929 words - 4 pages
1886 the labor union The Knights of Labor decided to protest about unfair wages within the work place. This protest took place in Chicago. A peaceful protest turned deadly when a bomb was thrown, and killed many workers, cops, and innocent by standers. Chicago police searched threw houses, without a search warrant, to find the person reasonable. Eight men were rounded up, and accused of throwing the bomb. The jury, with no real evidence, sentenced six of the eight men to death by hanging. Facts did not come out till after the innocent, but found it to be that the five men that was hung was innocent.
The last scheduled execution in Missouri was scheduled for January 28th 2015; Marcellus
938 words - 4 pages
decades or even centuries, has played in creating today’s environment and shaping the systems around us,” according to La June Montgomery Tabron. The actions I would take to change corruptions and poor training would be to start at the base of the issues. Starting at the police academy by giving officers the proper training and make adjustments to protocols on escalation of force. Another change I would do is make the jury all mixed in all court cases not just all white, not all black, but every race should be involved in a jury panel this would ensure no bias or discrimination against any accuser.
Conclusion race or ethnicity matters when deciding punishments and enforcing laws. The
2401 words - 10 pages
with the layout and wording of questions prior to your exam.
* Know your timings
For each question you should allow more time to answer part (b) than part (a) because part (b) carries more marks. Try to divide your time equally between all four questions on the paper in order to maximise your marks. It is a bad idea to do two brilliant essays on Forensic Psychology and then to find you have very little time to write your two Health and Clinical answers.
Example Exam Question and Mark Scheme
Below is the marking criteria for the questions. Although this is for a question on jury decision making, the same criteria for each band will apply to ALL four questions that you will answer
509 words - 3 pages
the idea of reenlisting in the Navy to reach retirement. Third I evaluated my alternatives by weighing the pros and cons to both sides of the argument. Forth I made the choice to separate and raise my children in an environment where I would be able to play a major role in their development. The fifth step was to implement the decision I made, by separating from the Navy and moving to southern Massachusetts. The evaluating process of the decision has been a long process, there are moments I wish I had stayed in but on the converse there are moments of my children’s life I would have missed if I had stayed in. So basically the jury is still out on whether I made the right one.
584 words - 3 pages
attorney (Journalists Guide, 2011). Pretrial Service Officers must verify information received from the defendant(s) because any information the officer receives could confirm what he/she has said, contradict it, or provide something more (Pretrial Service, n. d.).
A jury is selected through preemptory challenges or strikes. If it is a Capital case then each side gets twenty preemptory challenges. During a Felony case the Government has six preemptory challenges and the defendant has five. When the defendant is charged with a crime punishable by imprisonment of one year or more, each side will receive three preemptory challenges (Federal Rules, 2012).
The pretrial measures/arraignment Pleas
495 words - 2 pages
Jake that he is "just supposed to change the oil..." and not check the brakes, tires, transmission, etc. So it would appear that Jake is violating his duties. However, Jake argues that "as a certified mechanic, there are standards that (he has) to live up to" and that his actions are reasonable under the circumstances.
Whether Jake is "acting in the scope of employment" is a fact question to be decided by a jury. Given the circumstances, and that the overriding reason that Jake is working on the cars in the first place is Herman's free oil change it would appear that he is within the scope of employment.
2. Is Herman responsible for Jake's injury?
Yes, Jake is covered under state
653 words - 3 pages
unemployed. For example some companies have pension plans where employers and employees make contributions, other benefits include retirement programmes, life insurance, and savings plans.
WORK /LIFE BALANCE
These are programmes that help integrate their work and life responsibilities, these include time away from work (vacation, jury services) access to services to meet specific needs (drug counseling, financial planning referral to child and elderly care), and flexible work arrangement for (telecommuting, non paid time off and work-schedule flexibility so that family obligations can be met.
You also have well-being programmes that include health and wellness, financial rewards and security
546 words - 3 pages
stopping people from transgressing against their neighbours, taking action immediately, and refusing Eratosthenes offer of money while making a speech to show he was administering the law. He expected the Athenians to view him as a good citizen carrying out the laws of the city: “For I am now risking the loss of life, property and all else that I have, because I obeyed the city’s laws.” As a man with some influence among his neighbours, Euphiletus felt he could make such a claim. However, Euphiletus did allow his wife too much freedom which lead to him killing his wife’s lover
In conclusion, Euphiletus did present himself as both a good husband and good citizen to an extent due to his naivety and not keeping his eye on his wife. However, Euphiletus makes up for his mistakes by by persuading the jury that Eratosthene was to blame because it was ‘his profession’ and using this to justify murder as it benefitted athens meaning Eratosthene was unable to seduce other Athenian men’s wives.
1270 words - 6 pages
responsible for the damages. How damages would be recovered could be explored both civilly and criminally. A consideration in going after the organization would have to be whether they were a formal organization with a charter and assets or an informal loosely created campus group with no other real structure or assets. Going after Steel and possibly other individuals could and should be explored.
The school’s criminal liability would be dependent on how a judge or jury interpreted the events and any testimony given. Civil liability of the school may still be explored as the burden of proof is based a preponderance of the evidence versus beyond a reasonable doubt. Only Prudence would
1120 words - 5 pages
process of incorporation. The Joint Committee considered a draft of the constitutional amendment reported by the subcommittee of Bingham, Boutwell, and Rogers reads: “Congress shall have power to make laws which shall be necessary and proper to secure all persons in every state full protection in the enjoyment of life, liberty, and property; and to all citizens of the United States in every State the same immunities and also equal political rights and privileges” (Roland, 2000, p. 1). The doctrine of the incorporation of the Bill of Rights applies both procedurally and substantively to the guarantees of the states. Procedurally, only a jury can convict a defendant of a serious crime, since the
3304 words - 14 pages
. Then she decided to sue Mc Donald’s company about their hot coffee. Finally, Stella was awarded 640,000 US dollar by the jury. So what the major issue in this case?
In order to make an effective recommendation, we rewrote the case stating only the basic facts. This will allow us to come up with a sound recommendation.
The Basic facts
The woman was a passenger in a car at a McDonald's drive-thru. She received a cup of hot coffee, sealed by a lid, with an estimated temperature of 180 degrees. While attempting to remove the lid and add cream and sugar, she spilled the contents of the cup into her lap. She was wearing sweat pants that reportedly held the hot liquid against her skin for over 90
1448 words - 6 pages
criminal defense case. On other cases about one to two hours. The criminal defense takes longer because of all the foot work and phone calls. Then looking up the other cases but I really enjoy it.
Do you get to go to court with Mr. Daniels?
I do get to go to court with Mr. Daniels. Before the trial starts they do jury selection and I get to go and watch the people. You can tell a lot by watching the body language and faces on people they tell a lot. I got to jurors one time that knew the plaintiff, of course, they were not selected.
Are you over whelmed with cases and do you have any help?
Sometimes I get over whelmed. I take a break and then start on the job again. I am the only one so I
738 words - 3 pages
protects against abuse of government authority in a legal procedure. The 5th Amendment to the US Constitution was passed by ratified on December 15, 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights. In the Fifth Amendment no person shall be held to capital to answer unless on a presentment of a Grand Jury.
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution is what sets forth rights in the prosecution of criminals. In a criminal prosecution the accuser have the right to a speedy and public trial. The accused has the right to know what they are been charged for and why they are been held in jail. They also have the right to know who is saying that they've committed the crime, and the right to ask them
2918 words - 12 pages
allowed it, stating, “It is your constitutional right to try your own case.” Holmes questioned prospective jury members, at which point his team of attorneys left the courtroom. Holmes demonstrated the coolness with which he handled stress and tried rejecting each person who said he had read the papers, but the judge pointed out that this was not considered a cause for challenge. In any event, this all occurred well before the Supreme Court would rule about the unfairness of pretrial publicity. The jury was seated and the trial proceeded.
Holmes’ request to defend himself, Schechter says, was unprecedented. No accused murderer had done it before in the United States, so several lawyers and
1045 words - 5 pages
(www.prodeathpenalty.com). Knoch's escape could have been prevented had he been sentenced with the death penalty and placed on death row.
The death penalty could have prevented additional crimes as well. "On December 7, 1984 Benny Lee Chaffin kidnapped, raped, and murdered a nine-year-old Springfield, Oregon girl. He had been convicted of murder once before in Texas, but not executed. Incredibly, the same jury that convicted him for killing the young girl refused to sentence him to death because two of the 12 jurors said they could not determine whether or not he would be a future threat to society!"
"In 1957, Richard Biegenwald murdered a store owner during a robbery in New Jersey. He was