Wikipedia and its Credibility
Wikipedia and its Credibility
The Wikipedia is a free, online encyclopedia that lets every individual with Internet connection write and edits its articles. Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger launched their creation in 2001 giving an opportunity to all willing people to work together to develop a common resource of knowledge. Many people have different believes and ideas about Wikipedia, therefore, some tend to think of it as a credible and valid source of information, others strongly disagree. “Since all the books and articles have been chosen for publication, each one has presumably undergone some form of selection and review” (Spatt, 2011, “p.”339-340). ...view middle of the document...
Going straight to the source is the best way to check if the information in the article is reliable and credible.
A New Tool to Check the Quality of Articles
German professor Stock created a new tool that allows checking the quality of articles posted on Wikipedia and stated,
Wiki-Watch serves as a research tool indicating lack of sources and evaluating the reliability of every entry made, using WikiTrust’s color code system to display reputation of a text according to the reputation and number of revisions by users. Wiki-Watch analyzes every Wikipedia entry ever created in a few seconds, checks the number of sources used in the article and the quality of editing (para. 2).
Wiki-Watch uses a color codes system to check the reputation of the article by figuring out how many times people revised the article. White color means reliable information; therefore, yellow color has an opposite meaning. This system also checks for the credibility of the article and emphasizes individual words used in the article.
Many Editors to Correct the Errors
Wikipedia counts 75,000 editors who check the articles and their content to make sure that the information is valid and reliable. According to Schaffer (2009), the journal Nature conducted a study in 2005 and proved that Wikipedia is just as valid as any other encyclopedia, including Britannica, keeping in mind that errors and vandalism can occur to any of them (para. 2).
Even though Wikipedia will never be regarded as reliable source, it will always be an excellent place to find primary and secondary sources, look up a quick fact, or an overview. Wikipedia will always stay current because people post new events almost momentarily with included images and videos. Wikipedia will always be an indispensable tool that helps understand how to interpret the gathered information from different sources. People need to learn how to use it wisely instead of banning it as not credible or valid source. Wikipedia gives everybody a chance to believe in his importance and an opportunity to share one’s thoughts with the whole world.
Negative Sides of Wikipedia
Materials found in Wikipedia have not been necessarily reviewed by individuals with knowledge in that field required to provide people with reliable information. Even though many “experts publish articles to promote knowledge of their fields,” any person can author information and there is no requirement or qualification that the writers must meet to post information (Andrew, 2008, para. 6). Authors tend to impose their own thoughts and feelings on different...