Virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics
In this composition, I will equate the relationships and variances between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. I will examine the disparities in how each principle tackles principles and virtues, and finally illuminate an individual experience concerning virtue, values, and moral concepts, and how they relate to one of the three theories.
Individually ethics has elements that are the similar and different. Virtue Theory is a method to ethics that highlights a person's character as the main component of moral thinking, rather than guidelines about the actions themselves or their costs. Utilitarianism is the examination we should do is justly generating the highest conceivable value for the highest achievable amount of people. Deontological ethics is in observance of the Scriptures, accepted ethical rule and perceptions from common logic.
The similarities between the ...view middle of the document...
Virtue ethics is the make-up of an individual not the activities of an individual. Deontological ethics is a likeness of an individual’s ethics, which is eventually a mixture of who that person is.
Before contemplating or understanding, the different theories I now believe I experienced an ethic utilitarianism. This season I assisted with coaching my daughters’ softball team. As one expected, not everyone on the team was an A or even B player. Some girls had varying skills from those that were excellent fielders, hitters, and some that had never picked up a bat or glove before. Once children start to play for school teams, there is no expectation that they will play. Parents of the some of the girls believe that if their daughter is on the team then should play and that is not accurate. Over the season, the other coach and I would work those kids in that lacked the necessary skills to give them an opportunity to play and gain some experience. The girls on the team knew the other girls who lacked the skills to play and were ok with giving them some playing time during the season. Once we moved into the post season and championship brackets for our area the girls, who lacked skills did not play anymore due to their lack of abilities. The other coach and I received some colorful comments and pointed emails referencing our change in coaching style, but we tried to explain that what we are doing is for the benefit of the team and school. Morally and ethically, I do believe we were right in our actions, and this probably best illustrates the utilitarianism theory on a small scale described in this essay. Our actions allowed us to win the championship and bring attention to girl’s softball team in our area.
Each one of these ethical theories has penalties for actions. It may not be the emphasis of the act, but the result of the act's effects is principal as an outcome.
de Colle, S., & Werhane, P. H. (2008). Moral Motivation Across Ethical Theories: What Can We
Learn for Designing Corporate Ethics Programs?. Journal Of Business Ethics, 81(4), 751-764. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9545-7
Manias, N., Monroe, D., & Till, J. E. (2013). Ethics Applied, (7th ed.). Retrieved from The
University of Phoenix eBook Collection database.