This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

To Sting Or Not To Sting?

759 words - 4 pages

Choosing a string gauge for your guitar to accommodates your needs can be very difficult. In Guitar World Acoustic magazine, Larry Sandberg gives a few simple pointers to help you decide on what you want out of your strings. Sandberg mentions, "The desire to make you guitar easier to play is a lousy reason to change string gauge." I agree, there are many factors to think about besides the "feel" your new set will provide. When installing new strings to a guitar, you should focus on all the factors that come into place before deciding on the right gauge.Sandberg first mentions that a "lighter" set of strings will give you an easier feel on the neck, with much less tension of what "heavier" strings have to offer. So this means that if there is a concern about the guitar neck getting warped one should choose a lighter set. Sandberg adds, "Light gauge strings tug on the bridge of a typical-sized guitar with ...view middle of the document...

In other words, you will achieve a higher amount of tone and resonance from a thicker set. This is why many people agree that the tone and sound of a thicker set is better than the one acquired from a lighter set.In the case of a guitar with a smaller body, a thicker set of strings will not be necessary to produce sound, this is because it takes less energy from the strings to get the smaller body vibrating. Once you've considered the vibration of the body, you should consider how both light and heavy strings act when they are plucked on. A heavier set will tend to have a reduced range of motion, the lighter sets will ring out and vibrate in a larger range. According to Sandberg, "This means that lighter string are more likely to buzz or slap against the fret, which cuts down on sustain." Sandberg gives us even more to consider about the way different strings feel. The feel of the strings will be different as you pluck them, a lighter set of strings is normally the best choice for those who prefer to finger-pick, and a medium set allows you to use a pick and to receive a good response from the strings with our the pick getting caught in between the strings. So this means that a thicker set may be too tight for you to finger or for the pick to pluck.Tension, playability, tone, sound, behavior, and feel, are all factors that you should take into consideration. I agree with Sandberg, if you want to have a guitar that is easier to play, you must first think about all you options. If you like a thicker tone, be sure for the challenge of playing strings under a considerable amount of tension, and if you like to play with ease, be ready to sacrifice some of your time in exchange. you should be willing to experiment with the different gauges and brands until you find the happy medium between tone and feel. Many people who have played for a long time will tell you that to find the right set might be a struggle that takes time and patience. In the end you should go with what you feel is right for you, because no two players have the same needs, and again keep in mind that, "The desire to make your guitar easier to play is a lousy reason to change strings."

Other Papers Like To Sting Or Not To Sting?

Immune or Not to Immune Essay

839 words - 4 pages To immune or not to immune? Alicia Thornton Excelsior College Vaccines have been widely used in the United States since the 1700’s. The use of vaccinations has deeply affected the occurrence of many types of infectious diseases. Without the use of vaccines, the death rate from viruses and diseases would be extremely high. Due to a new strain of avian flu has formulated in China, I suggest that a vaccine should become mandatory in this

Diversify Or Not To Diversify Essay

1664 words - 7 pages their customer base. It also helps in enhancing the product portfolio of the company by introducing complimenting products in the market. (Investments, 2010) However, if internal management and personnel issues are not taken into consideration in view of a merger or acquisition, the whole diversification could end disastrously. When considering the possibility of acquiring a new company, one needs to ensure that the people at the managerial

Vaccinate or Not to Vaccinate

1453 words - 6 pages Exploratory Essay To Vaccinate or Not To Vaccinate Vaccines were brought to the United States by Dr. Benjamin Waterhouse in 1800. (The College of Physicians of Philadelphia) Dr. Waterhouse pushed for public vaccinations to eradicate the small pox epidemic through community immunity. “Community immunity” or “herd immunity” is where a significant percentage of the population is immune to a disease, either through vaccination or prior illness

To Conscript, or Not to Conscript

1862 words - 8 pages To Conscript, or not to Conscript Enter student name here Enter school name here Abstract The question on whether the United States military should be based on a conscription style of enlistment has been debated for many years. The US has had several instances where conscription, or “draft” as it was referred to a few times, was enacted to supplement troop numbers during a period of conflict. Some

To Drill or Not to Drill

573 words - 3 pages To Drill or Not to Drill HUM/111 Many debates are centered on energy. Some people think that we should decrease our dependency on oil and invest in alternative energy, other people believe that we do not need a new power source; we should be using our own oil and not that of foreign countries. I am not on one side or the other necessarily. I think that we should decrease our dependency on foreign oil. I also think that we should look

To Drill or Not to Drill

614 words - 3 pages To Drill or Not To Drill Tameka Jones Critical and Creative Thinking June 19, 2011 Laura Miller Axia College of University of Phoenix I agree with the idea of President Obama pushing forward his agenda to free America from dependency on foreign oil. It may be a very expensive push, but the push is far from unnecessary. Plenty of people have been relying on and a little too dependent on oil and therefore we should not be able

To Eat or Not to Eat

1212 words - 5 pages To Eat or Not to Eat Amber Janine Chandler PSY/240 Saturday, May 5th, 2012 Susan Forde, Ph.D. To Eat or Not to Eat The human body needs nutrients to live. In fact, ever body – whether human, animal, or plant – needs nutrients to survive. And the quickest way for organisms to get those nutrients is through food. But what causes us to eat? What motivators push us toward finding that next meal? When do we know when we’re actually

To Bomb or Not to Bomb

619 words - 3 pages To Bomb or Not to Bomb essay There have been many debates over whether or not the United States should have dropped the atomic bomb on Japan. Did the ends justify the means? Was it necessary to drop two? I believe it was not. Too many were killed and there must have been another way to end the war. August of 1945 was a tough time for not only the United States, but for the world. It was a time where paranoia was common and fear was a part of

To Ban or Not to Ban

1007 words - 5 pages Dawn Branscombe 21st Century Skills: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving March 20, 2016 Chip Hellman To Ban or Not to Ban With gun violence on the rise, some lawmakers have decided to argue for the banning of guns. (Vizzard, 2015) Over the years, there have been many arguments between citizens and lawmakers whether to ban guns or not. With mass shootings in Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Arizona in recent years, the argument has

To Cure Or Not To Cure

1939 words - 8 pages Drug Addiction: To Cure or Not To Cure Chris G Kinney University of Phoenix Abstract Drug addiction is a huge social problem to some people feel there is no end. People either try to fight this disease or just put their hands down preferring to think that nothing could be done. This paper investigates what drug addiction really is and why some people believe it is incurable. Primarily

To Clone or Not to Clone

1146 words - 5 pages were not a factor, should humans have the unrestricted right to clone themselves? The right or even need for humans to clone themselves is as complex a moral or ethical issue as it is a complex bimolecular and genetic procedure. There may be no definitive answer to the ethical or moral dilemmas but in my opinion there is not a reason compelling enough to justify human reproductive cloning of an entire human being, even if it were technically

Related Essays

To Drill Or Not Essay

363 words - 2 pages To Drill or Not To Drill? by Eli Turnup While reading this article I found myself thinking of the positives that come with alternate sources of energy, and I had to take into account what be negative in going that route. What I got from the article was the idea of using alternate sources of energy to replace usage of oil in an attempt to provide an everlasting source for the future. By attempting to provide an alternate source of energy

To Immunize Or Not? Essay

1575 words - 7 pages school children. This legislation allows parents to opt out of vaccine schedules. A form is signed and is put in the student’s file stating he or she is exempt from any vaccinations. All other provinces in Canada do not have any sort of legislation. This usually leads to public health nurses coming into schools and using scare tactics on students and doctors doing the same to parents, threatening that their children will not be allowed to go to school

To Perform Cpr Or Not Essay

1518 words - 7 pages individuals is if the Glenwood Gardens policy pertaining to not giving CPR to a patient was ethical or not. The biggest argument against their policy is that many people feel that an individual should not be left to die. When put in a situation like the one at Glenwood Gardens, individuals should do everything in their power to save the person. It’s a moral obligation. If the nurse didn’t feel comfortable breaking company policy, then she should

To Nuke Or Not Nuke Essay

2268 words - 10 pages their nuclear weapons or not, given that the US already fired the weapon. As you can see in figure 1, all of the outcomes in stage 1 is negative due to all the destructions and lives lost as a result of a nuclear war. If a country is to fire and get hit, the outcome would be -1 since the country at least got to fight back as a strong nation. On the other hand, the group that only gets attacked but not fight back would have the outcome of -2 since