This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

‘The Weimar Government Completely Recovered In The Period Of 1924 1928’. How Far Do You Agree?

572 words - 3 pages

‘The Weimar Government completely Recovered in the period of 1924-1928’. How far do you agree?

After thorough research in this topic I am swayed more into agreeing that the Weimar Government did recover. This is because of multiple strong reasons that indicate they recovered. The Weimar was able to stabilise the economy using the Stressman’s Rentmark and taking loans from the USA. With a stable economy this shows that the Weimar republic recovered as before the economy was a mess because of the war and then the Treaty of Versailles. In 1925 the German government also signed the Locarno treaty which the abled them to get a seat in the League of Nations in 1926. This is important, as they are now part of a group that will help each other out in tough ...view middle of the document...

Finally in 1928 they were able to keep the Nazi party down to only 3% of the German peoples votes. This showed that the German people did not really want the Nazis at this time, as the economy was doing so well and life in Germany on the whole so much better as they adopted the western style of life.

However some would say that they hadn’t recovered because many people in Germany thought that the new German culture was immoral and that they were just trying to adopt this new culture to impress the western countries such as Britain and America. Also 30% of German votes were going to anti-democratic parties, this is very bad as even if a party gets 1% they will be able to get a seat in the Weimar republic and therefor getting a say in discussions. Peasant farmers were also struggling at this time due to the acceptance of the treaty of Versailles, which took away a lot of German farm land and a lot of the agricultural. In the coal and iron industry was in strikes because of the French invasion into the Ruhr land. Many also thought that Germany was over reliant on the USA, if the USA’s economy crashed the German government would be in a bad state, and as many know the wall street crash did occur. Right Wing Nationalists hated the Locarno treaty, most right wing nationalists were of Russian descent therefor they hated the Locarno treaty as Russia thought it was being stabbed in the back by the USA, Britain and France. Germany and Russia are enemy’s and Russia were not given any benefits from the Treaty of Versailles and Germany were allowed into the league of nations.

In conclusion I am swayed slightly more to the side that agrees that the Weimar Republic did recover as the economy was strong again after its weak period of hyper inflation.

Other Papers Like ‘The Weimar Government completely Recovered in the period of 1924-1928’. How far do you agree?

‘Investment and Support from Foreign Powers Was the Main Reason the Weimar Republic Survived in the 1920s.’ How Far Do You Agree?

752 words - 4 pages ‘Investment and support from foreign powers was the main reason the Weimar Republic survived in the 1920s.’ How far do you agree? During the 1920s, there were many ups and downs for Weimar Germany and to start with they struggled and bounced between governments, especially with hyperinflation in 1923. But with the help of foreign support, Weimar was able to make it to the 1930s. It could be said that the Locarno Pact contributed greatly to the

How Far Do You Agree That a Study of Russia in the Period from 1855 to 1956 Suggests That Change Was Always Imposed from Above?

1048 words - 5 pages How far do you agree that a study of Russia in the period from 1855 to 1956 suggests that change was always imposed from above? Throughout the period 1855-1956, it’s clear that with both the Tsars and the Bolsheviks, change was, often implemented from both the leaders and the people, However, under both Tsars and the Bolsheviks, they were ruthlessly prevented from striking, having trade unions or really having any control over the future

How Far Do You Agree That the Economy of Tsarist Russia Was Transformed in the Years Up to 1914?

1089 words - 5 pages How far do you agree that the economy of Tsarist Russia was transformed in the years up to 1914? During Alexander III reign, the Country of Russia and its economy was in a very backward state. We saw the Country suffer with extremely low industrialisation, as many of their workforce focused on agriculture. They struggled to sell enough grain at export, in order to fund large scale industrialisation as the serfs were forced by lack of freedom to

How Far Do You Agree That Trotsky’s Leadership of the Red Army Was Responsible for the Survival of the Bolshevik Government? (30 Marks)

1497 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that Trotsky’s leadership of the Red Army was responsible for the survival of the Bolshevik government? (30 marks) There were many factors that contributed to the survival of the Bolshevik Government, ranging from Trotsky’s leadership of the Red Army to the failings of the Bolsheviks’ rivals for power. This essay shows that the main reason for the Bolsheviks’ continued survival through the period was not Trotsky’s great

How Far Do You Agree with the View That Stalin’s Foreign Policy Was a Major Contributing Factor to the Emergence of the Cold War in the Period 1945-50?

564 words - 3 pages During the period of 1945 to 1950 the Cold War developed between the Superpowers of the United States and the Soviet Union. The end of the Second World War had resulted in a power vacuum over war-torn Europe and left a legacy of mistrust and suspicion between the two superpowers. The Yalta and Potsdam conferences proved this as they failed to agree on certain issues and as the leaders of the United Kingdom and United States changed in between

How Far Do You Agree with the View That the Origins of the Cold War in the Period 1945-1950 Owed Much to Ideological Differences and Little to Personalities and Conflicting National Interests?

1136 words - 5 pages There is a lot of debate of which factor played the largest role in initiating the Cold War during the period of 1945-50. Mostly sources 7 and 9 argue that various ideological differences between the two superpowers were responsible for the origins of the Cold War; while sources 8 and also 9 differ and state that it could have been down to other factors, such as conflicting personalities of the leaders and general national interests. On the

The Leadership of Henry V Was Responsible for English Success in France 1415-1420, How Far Do You Agree?

825 words - 4 pages The leadership of Henry v was responsible for English success in France 1415-1420, How far do you agree? The leadership of Henry V was partially responsible for the English success in France during 1415-1420, however it can be argued that luck is a far greater factor to the English’s success, as luck was essential in several battles such as the mud in Agincourt and the fact that the Burgundian and Armagnac division was tearing France apart did

"Money Is the Root of All Evil." How Far Do You Agree with This?

563 words - 3 pages regards money as an end in itself, to be increased and amassed for its own sake, he is liable to become selfish and miserly, unconcerned about other people or their needs. If he sees money as a means of buying physical pleasures for himself, he is in danger of becoming a corrupt, indeed a criminal. If, on the other hand, he earns money, but spends it wisely, he can do nothing but good, this good may be to himself, if he spends his money to secure

How Far Do You Agree That the Impact of the Second World War Was the Main Reason Why the Position of African Americans Improved in the Years 1945

1461 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that the impact of the Second World War was the main reason why the position of African Americans improved in the years 1945–55? The impact of the Second World War was, without a doubt, crucial in improving the lives of black Americans over the years 1945-55, as it led to federal support of the cause. However, it wasn’t as important as the use of direct action which, for the first time, was able to convert de jure into de

How Far Do You Agree That the Limited Appeal of Mazzini's Ideas Was the Main Reason for the Slow Progress of National Unity in the Years 1815-48?

1530 words - 7 pages goals from other states, in slowing the progress of unification were much more important than the lack of support for Mazzini. Mazzini's one overriding aim was to create 'the brotherhood of the people', an independent state based on democracy with a guarantee of individual rights. He wanted a revolution from below, with the people seizing power and rising up against their oppressors. Unfortunately, this meant that Mazzini completely alienated

War Was the Most Significant Factor in Causing Change in Russia from 1856-1964. How Far Do You Agree?

2246 words - 9 pages throughout the period in question. During this period, there were many key individuals who were influential in how Russia was run, leaders such as Tsar Nicholas II who drafted the October Manifesto permitting free speech. Foreign influence may have also played a key role in the modernisation of Russia as it may have sparked many reforms in Russia as ‘westernisers’ insisted on the need to follow in the wake of Western civilization and imitate the Western

Related Essays

.How Far Do You Agree With The View That The Development Of The Cold War In The Period 1945 50 Was The Result Of Stalin’s Foreign Policy?

3210 words - 13 pages .How far do you agree with the view that the development of the Cold War in the period 1945-50 was the result of Stalin’s foreign policy? Development of the Cold War, in the five years between 1945 and 1950, could be argued as taking place for a number of reasons and due to various individuals. It could be easy to simply site Stalin as the main reason responsible for it’s outbreak and growth, clear through his approach on communist expansion

How Far Do You Agree With The View That The Development Of The Cold War In The Period 1945 50 Was The Result Of Stalin’s Foreign Policy?

3182 words - 13 pages scare developed from the high feelings of anti-communism in the 1940s and early 1950s, which evolved into a wave of hysteria, generated by a fear that the USA was being undermined by the enemy, from within their own country. Despite the fact that the communist party in the USA never exceeded 100,000 members, suspicions of communist spies in the US government ran rife in this period causing an ever growing drift between the superpowers and more

The Main Threat To Weimar Stability Between 1919 23 Came From The Right. How Far Do You Agree?

868 words - 4 pages The Main threat to Weimar stability between 1919-23 came from the right. How far do you agree? The right WERE a serious problem to stability for the Weimar between 1919-23. But so were the far left, some aspects of the new constitution and the country was also threatened by economic challenges that threatened to overwhelm her. Some of this was due to Versailles but some was due to overspending accrued in the build up to WWI. There can be

The Main Threat To The Stability Of The Weimar Republic From 1919 – 1923 Came From The Political Violence Of The Extreme Right” How Far Do You Agree?

906 words - 4 pages “The main threat to the stability of the Weimar Republic from 1919 – 1923 came from the political violence of the extreme right” How far do you agree? Many have argued that the political violence of the extreme right was the main threat to the stability of the Weimar. However, despite elements of this argument being true; one could suggest that there are other factors that contributed to the end of the Republic, such as the constitution