“The Rising Tension Between East And West Between 1945 1949 Was Due To Stalin’s Hold Over Eastern Europe” How Far Do You Agree With This View?

1376 words - 6 pages

“The rising tension between east and west between 1945-1949 was due to Stalin’s hold over eastern Europe” How far do you agree with this view? (25 marks)
Following the Second World War the post war world was left fragile, disrupted and heavily damaged and it was vital that the future of the East and West were determined quickly and correctly as to avoid a rise in underlying tension. Due to the common enemy of Nazism having been removed, the differences in the political ideologies of the east and west were immediately highlighted consequently causing an initial rise in tension. Although at the time Stalin and the Soviet Union were solely thought to be to blame for the intense rise in ...view middle of the document...

Bribery, physical bullying and even assassinations were all used to force anti-communism out of countries; for example in Czechoslovakia the Prime Minister Benes and all anti-communist ministers were forced out of office via death threats and physical bullying in 1948 and even through the police force and workers which had been converted to pro-communist political views despite an initial absence of communist support within the country. By eradicating all chances of opposition when elections were held in 1948 all the candidates were communist causing Czechoslovakia to become a single party state and this process of rigging elections with the façade of democracy through allowing voting to occur was a major factor for the rise in tension as not only was Stalin breaking the Atlantic charter, he was also controlling countries he had no right to and in many cases causing countries to be communist against their will.
HI talk about sexton Watsons idea 3 stage politics example in Bulgaria i9o

Stalin’s paranoia extended into his increasingly oppressive governments where all aspects of the government was controlled, most significantly the interior ministries where secret police forces much like the gestapo in Nazi Germany were devised to eradicate all opposition. The most notable was the AVO which took place in Hungary and was designed to remove any citizen or group who opposed control from Moscow in Hungary through puppet governments. The headquarters of the AVO are now known as Terror House which reflects how the secret police enforced the communist regime; through terror. Equipped with their own torture chambers, the AVO actively sought out any potential anti-communists to strike fear into the population so that they conform and this was largely effective as the majority of the population was anti-communist with only 17% voting for the Hungarian Communist Party in 1945 which shows that even if communism already existed in certain countries through established parties that it was always the most popular choice by any means and this use of interior ministries to increase party support is a major contributor towards an increase in tension because many were unwilling to conform. The AVO and its desire to let control come from Moscow is a prime example of Stalin using puppet governments to give off the façade that these populations were allowed to democratically vote for communism when it was the influence from interior ministries and opposition eradication that really facilitated the movement of communism within those countries.
Alternatively, the spread of communism into Eastern European states can be seen as way of Stalin regaining losses from the war including territorial and economic losses. The Soviet Union had been left destroyed with 27 million dead, 17000 villages demolished and nearly all industry being eradicated and so as many countries wished to do, Stalin went about trying to seek the best opportunities in raw materials and economies...

Other Papers Like “The Rising Tension Between East And West Between 1945-1949 Was Due To Stalin’S Hold Over Eastern Europe” How Far Do You Agree With This View?

“Singapore’s Separation from the Federation Was Inevitable.” How Far Do You Agree with This Statement? Discuss

522 words - 3 pages Question) “Singapore’s separation from the federation was inevitable.” How far do you agree with this statement? Discuss. I agree with this statement to a large extent as during the two years when Singapore was part of Malaysia as there was an irreconcilable political difference between PAP and UMNO. Malaysia also thought of Singapore as an economical rival. The only thing that kept the two parties together

How Far Do You Agree with the View That the Origins of the Cold War in the Period 1945-1950 Owed Much to Ideological Differences and Little to Personalities and Conflicting National Interests?

1136 words - 5 pages continuously spreading throughout the Eastern Europe. This can be further supported by the fact that there were serious disagreements over Poland at Yalta and Potsdam conferences in 1945, as Truman strongly believed Poland should have a democratic government but Stalin disagreed. This evidence shows how bipolar their interests were – Stalin wanted a buffer zone in Eastern Europe, while Truman was desperate to stop communism from spreading any further

How far do you agree with the view that America was a land of opportunity during the 1920s?"

1732 words - 7 pages "How far do you agree with the view that America was a land of opportunity during the 1920s?" Explain your answer using sources 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and your own knowledge. (40 marks) The 1920s are widely known as the 'Boom Era', or the 'Roaring Twenties' and a "decade of lively economic growth" (Source 3), due to the sheer economic success and advancement, and the emergence of the motor car, Hollywood, consumerism and

How Far Do You Agree with the View That the Development of the Cold War in the Years 1945-8 Owed More to Soviet Expansionism Than to Usas Economic Interests?

1044 words - 5 pages How far do you agree with the view that the development of the Cold War in the years 1945-8 owed more to Soviet expansionism than to USA’s economic interests? My opinion is that the development of the Cold War was due to Soviet expansionism rather than the USA’s economic interests in the years 1945-48. The Sources all present to some extent the idea that Soviet expansionism was to blame. Source 7 argues Soviet expansionism as the most

How Far Do You Agree with the View That the Development of the Cold War in the Years 1945 – 48 Owed More to Soviet Expansionism Than to the Usa’s Economic Interests?

1126 words - 5 pages Long Telegram (1946) confirmed this fear in the US, as George Kennan analysed the Soviet foreign policy as suspicious and aggressive, which was one of the reasons why the Truman not willing to compromise with the Stalin at all, which led to the change from allies to enemies over this period. Soviet expansionism is the less important of the two factors listed in the question as US economic interests sparked more tension between the two powers than

'Cb's Sensational Effects Are Always Grounded in the Everyday World'. How Far and in What Ways Do You Agree with This View of 'Jane Eyre'?

984 words - 4 pages 'CB's sensational effects are always grounded in the everyday world'. How far and in what ways do you agree with this view of 'Jane Eyre'? A primary way that the ‘sensational effects’ in ‘Jane Eyre’ are ‘always grounded in the everyday world’ is through Jane’s explanation of supernatural events. Additionally, the shocks and hardships of Lowood School, twinned with the treatment of Jane by Brocklehurst in what seems like a routinely manner

How Far Do You Agree With The View That The Development Of The Cold War In The Years 1945-1948 Owed More Too Soviet Expansionism Than To The Usa’S Economic Interests?

1608 words - 7 pages it did cause some tension between the two superpowers, the Soviet Union viewed the Marshall plan as an attack on communism and saw it as a mechanism by which the USA would gain control over Europe and exploit it for America’s economic interests. This was known as dollar imperialism. On the other hand the Marshall Plan was introduced with the Truman Doctrine and many say that its main purpose was to prevent the spread of communism and not for

The Main Threat to Weimar Stability Between 1919-23 Came from the Right. How Far Do You Agree?

868 words - 4 pages The Main threat to Weimar stability between 1919-23 came from the right. How far do you agree? The right WERE a serious problem to stability for the Weimar between 1919-23. But so were the far left, some aspects of the new constitution and the country was also threatened by economic challenges that threatened to overwhelm her. Some of this was due to Versailles but some was due to overspending accrued in the build up to WWI. There can be

Opposition Was the Main Problem Facing Alexander3. How Far Do You Agree with the Statement?

1343 words - 6 pages power as an autocrat, which meant that there were no room for opposition that could jeopardise his reign. But at that point he could still hold his control over Russia and opposition was too weak and divided to challenge the Tsar, at that time Empire faced more economical and social problems that Tsar needed to solve. As a child Alexander had Pobedonoscev as his tutor who was Tsars chief minister and leading official of the State Church. He was

How far did relations between East and West change during the Cold War period from 1948 to the 1980s?

1643 words - 7 pages it lasted just over a decade and was weakened by the 80s, so the changes do seem to have been limited. The beginning of the period does seem to mimic the end; in both cases unrest in the Satellite states were the causes of unrest. The treaties and agreements late 60s and 70s merely seem to show that there was a short period of détente and Ostpolitik, but that this was only temporary. However, I must conclude that there was indeed a change from bad relations to positive relations that by the 80s did deteriorate. Hence, overall, relations between the East and West in the period from 1948 to the 1980s did change, though not that significantly.

"Money Is the Root of All Evil." How Far Do You Agree with This?

563 words - 3 pages regards money as an end in itself, to be increased and amassed for its own sake, he is liable to become selfish and miserly, unconcerned about other people or their needs. If he sees money as a means of buying physical pleasures for himself, he is in danger of becoming a corrupt, indeed a criminal. If, on the other hand, he earns money, but spends it wisely, he can do nothing but good, this good may be to himself, if he spends his money to secure

Related Essays

.How Far Do You Agree With The View That The Development Of The Cold War In The Period 1945 50 Was The Result Of Stalin’s Foreign Policy?

3210 words - 13 pages .How far do you agree with the view that the development of the Cold War in the period 1945-50 was the result of Stalin’s foreign policy? Development of the Cold War, in the five years between 1945 and 1950, could be argued as taking place for a number of reasons and due to various individuals. It could be easy to simply site Stalin as the main reason responsible for it’s outbreak and growth, clear through his approach on communist expansion

How Far Do You Agree With The View That The Development Of The Cold War In The Period 1945 50 Was The Result Of Stalin’s Foreign Policy?

3182 words - 13 pages Germany and Berlin were split into Western and Eastern zones; recognised that this could not be a long term solution, the West wanted to rebuild Germany and create a stable democracy and economy – Stalin on the other hand was more concerned with making Germany pay to the full extent. Source S, an extract of Geoffrey Roberts’ ‘Stalin Wars’, reinforces the fact that Stalin’s view and inability to agree with the West over the German question, “was

How Far Do You Agree With The View That Stalin’s Foreign Policy Was A Major Contributing Factor To The Emergence Of The Cold War In The Period 1945 50?

564 words - 3 pages considered as also fuelling the fire that caused the Cold War. Stalin was partly to blame for his involvement in the Eastern European war-torn countries after the Yalta Conference. This caused a tension between America and the Soviet Union as Stalin showed communism to the west to be ruthless and taking no prisoners when it came to Stalin's policy of defending Socialism. However Truman's America can also be to blame with that he gave Stalin the

‘Tsar Remained Essentially Unchanged Upon The Eve Of Its Destruction’. How Far Do You Agree With This View Of Tsarist Autocracy Between 1855 1917?

1320 words - 6 pages ‘Tsarism remained essentially unchanged upon the eve of its destruction’. How far do you agree with this view of Tsarist autocracy between 1855-1917? At first glance, it would appear that change was the dominant theme in Russian history between 1855-1917—in 1913, Tsar Nicholas and his family celebrated three hundred years of autocratic rule by his family, the Romanovs. Yet, just four years later, he was forced to abdicate and was then