This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Main Threat To Weimar Stability Between 1919 23 Came From The Right. How Far Do You Agree?

868 words - 4 pages

The Main threat to Weimar stability between 1919-23 came from the right. How far do you agree?
The right WERE a serious problem to stability for the Weimar between 1919-23. But so were the far left, some aspects of the new constitution and the country was also threatened by economic challenges that threatened to overwhelm her. Some of this was due to Versailles but some was due to overspending accrued in the build up to WWI.
There can be little doubt that the right posed a threat to stability. Whilst never a recognised cohesive movement with an agenda, there’s was the politics of hate and disruption. The malicious Organisation Consul made many assassination attempts and were ...view middle of the document...

They lacked a ‘champion’ or focal point to rally around however and thus could be declared as being less of a threat practically.
Threats from the left were far more numerous and potent given t he success of the recent Russian revolution in 1917 and the large numbers of hungry and poor dispossessed in Germany after WWI. The left had a gifted intellectual leader in Rosa Luxembourg and many Germans had been lobbying for a share in power for years, way before WWI. But Germany also had a powerful army, a large middle class who would resist any attempt to change the status quo. Also, the communists in Germany tended to be ‘locally aware’ and there wasn’t a national framework of communication or recognition. The failed coup in Berlin January 1919 demonstrated that the establishment had more power than the left. Additionally, many working class people were loyal to the republic and politically were supportive of the SPD and not the KPD.
The stability may have been threatened by burdens from the past: Versailles demanded ridiculous levels of reparations and Germany had already bankrupted herself to pay for WWI before this imposition. Germany was never able to pay these back sufficiently and in 1923 was invaded by France and Belgium, claiming they needed to seize goods ‘in lieu’ of reparation failures. This caused a chain reaction of strikes, a loss of government revenue and then the catastrophic hyperinflation that brought the country to its knees financially. The Dawes Plan reinvested cash...

Other Papers Like The Main Threat to Weimar Stability Between 1919-23 Came from the Right. How Far Do You Agree?

“Singapore’s Separation from the Federation Was Inevitable.” How Far Do You Agree with This Statement? Discuss

522 words - 3 pages Question) “Singapore’s separation from the federation was inevitable.” How far do you agree with this statement? Discuss. I agree with this statement to a large extent as during the two years when Singapore was part of Malaysia as there was an irreconcilable political difference between PAP and UMNO. Malaysia also thought of Singapore as an economical rival. The only thing that kept the two parties together

How Far Do You Agree That Lenin’s Leadership Was the Main Reason for Why the Bolsheviks Were Able to Seize Power in 1917

1350 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that Lenin’s leadership was the main reason for why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917. Lenin was a very significant figure during the Russian revolution, under his strong leadership and the advice of some of his advisors, Lenin helped the Bolsheviks come to power. However I would not agree that his leadership was the main reason to why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power as factors such as the weakness

‘Nuclear Power Is the Only Answer to Global Energy Needs.’ How Far Do You Agree?

708 words - 3 pages ‘Nuclear power is the only answer to global energy needs.’ How far do you agree? The philosophy of today’s centaury becomes the common sense for the next. Going through the development and civilization humans have made themselves dependent of own discoveries in an attempt to make their life advanced, easier and efficient. Aftermath industrial revolution ,humans can not sustain without energy ,there is an easy and thoughtless reliance

“The Rising Tension Between East And West Between 1945-1949 Was Due To Stalin’S Hold Over Eastern Europe” How Far Do You Agree With This View?

1376 words - 6 pages “The rising tension between east and west between 1945-1949 was due to Stalin’s hold over eastern Europe” How far do you agree with this view? (25 marks) Following the Second World War the post war world was left fragile, disrupted and heavily damaged and it was vital that the future of the East and West were determined quickly and correctly as to avoid a rise in underlying tension. Due to the common enemy of Nazism having been removed, the

How Far Do You Agree That a Study of Russia in the Period from 1855 to 1956 Suggests That Change Was Always Imposed from Above?

1048 words - 5 pages How far do you agree that a study of Russia in the period from 1855 to 1956 suggests that change was always imposed from above? Throughout the period 1855-1956, it’s clear that with both the Tsars and the Bolsheviks, change was, often implemented from both the leaders and the people, However, under both Tsars and the Bolsheviks, they were ruthlessly prevented from striking, having trade unions or really having any control over the future

War Was the Most Significant Factor in Causing Change in Russia from 1856-1964. How Far Do You Agree?

2246 words - 9 pages War was a very significant factor in causing change in Russia from 1856-1964 as it encouraged industrialisation through the emancipation of the serfs and also sparked a growth of opposition against the regime in power at the time, both under Tsarist control and later under Communism. However, it is also possible to argue that war wasn’t the most significant factor in causing change in Russia as there are other factors that shaped Russia

How Far Do You Agree That the Most Important Reason for Wolsey’s Fall from Power Was His Failure to Gain a Divorce for Henry Viii?

957 words - 4 pages The most important reason for Wolsey’s fall from power was his failure to gain a divorce for Henry VIII, how far do you agree? Wolsey’s dismissal from Henry’s court came in September 1529, though Wolsey had a plethora of failures before, his fall his failure to get a divorce for Henry VIII proved to be the most significant. This is because Wolsey’s strength of position depended on whether he got Henry what he wanted and the divorce was the

How Far Do You Agree That the Impact of the Second World War Was the Main Reason Why the Position of African Americans Improved in the Years 1945

1461 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that the impact of the Second World War was the main reason why the position of African Americans improved in the years 1945–55? The impact of the Second World War was, without a doubt, crucial in improving the lives of black Americans over the years 1945-55, as it led to federal support of the cause. However, it wasn’t as important as the use of direct action which, for the first time, was able to convert de jure into de

How Far Do You Agree That the Limited Appeal of Mazzini's Ideas Was the Main Reason for the Slow Progress of National Unity in the Years 1815-48?

1530 words - 7 pages the emerging middle class. Consequently, Mazzini was not able to gain support from people that possessed official power, with Charles Albert going so far as to execute twelve of the sixty seven arrested members of Young Italy after an attempted coup in Piedmont in 1833. Instead, he aimed his policies at the working class peasants, who made up 80% of the population in Italy, and over 90% in poorer states such as Naples. By inspiring them to revolt

How Far Do You Agree That the Economy of Tsarist Russia Was Transformed in the Years Up to 1914?

1089 words - 5 pages How far do you agree that the economy of Tsarist Russia was transformed in the years up to 1914? During Alexander III reign, the Country of Russia and its economy was in a very backward state. We saw the Country suffer with extremely low industrialisation, as many of their workforce focused on agriculture. They struggled to sell enough grain at export, in order to fund large scale industrialisation as the serfs were forced by lack of freedom to

How Far Do You Agree Stalins Five Year Plans (1929-1941) Improved the Russian Economy?

1254 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that Stalin’s five year plans (1929-1941) improved the Russian economy? I strongly agree with the view that Stalin’s five year plans improved the Russian economy because of the significant growth in the Russian economy between this times in which the economy was growing at 14% a year. Stalin’s 5 year plans did improve the economy due to heavy industry increased the production of steel. Iron and coal, also by the end of the

Related Essays

The Main Threat To The Stability Of The Weimar Republic From 1919 – 1923 Came From The Political Violence Of The Extreme Right” How Far Do You Agree?

906 words - 4 pages “The main threat to the stability of the Weimar Republic from 1919 – 1923 came from the political violence of the extreme right” How far do you agree? Many have argued that the political violence of the extreme right was the main threat to the stability of the Weimar. However, despite elements of this argument being true; one could suggest that there are other factors that contributed to the end of the Republic, such as the constitution

‘Investment And Support From Foreign Powers Was The Main Reason The Weimar Republic Survived In The 1920s.’ How Far Do You Agree?

752 words - 4 pages ‘Investment and support from foreign powers was the main reason the Weimar Republic survived in the 1920s.’ How far do you agree? During the 1920s, there were many ups and downs for Weimar Germany and to start with they struggled and bounced between governments, especially with hyperinflation in 1923. But with the help of foreign support, Weimar was able to make it to the 1930s. It could be said that the Locarno Pact contributed greatly to the

‘The Weimar Government Completely Recovered In The Period Of 1924 1928’. How Far Do You Agree?

572 words - 3 pages ‘The Weimar Government completely Recovered in the period of 1924-1928’. How far do you agree? After thorough research in this topic I am swayed more into agreeing that the Weimar Government did recover. This is because of multiple strong reasons that indicate they recovered. The Weimar was able to stabilise the economy using the Stressman’s Rentmark and taking loans from the USA. With a stable economy this shows that the Weimar

Opposition Was The Main Problem Facing Alexander3. How Far Do You Agree With The Statement?

1343 words - 6 pages modernising. Also educational reforms made a new class called “intelligencia” who shared western liberal views. As well as there were extremist groups that felt the only way for Russia to change was eradication of the monarch, they did not have clear aim what to do after. Alexander understood that and he launched strong repressions to preserve stability of monarchy, he believed that they were main threat and problem of Russia. Together with Pobedonoscev he