History of American Women
May 27, 2015
Equality: Too Much to Ask For?
The Equal Rights Amendment has been the source of much debate for almost an entire century now. Since first purposed by Alice Paul in the 1920s one’s stance on the potential amendment has been a dividing factor in the political sphere. Though the amendment was shut down in the 1920s there has been discussion about adding the Equal Rights Amendment into the constitution today. If the potential amendment was to be brought back up my stance on the debate would be in support of the amendment.
For some background on the debate on the Equal Rights Amendment it would be good to look back and see where activists ...view middle of the document...
On the opposing side of the argument were the Female Reformers who argued for gender privileges, saw women in politics as public housekeeping, and was concerned with a woman’s maternal capacity. These activists were opposed to the Equal Rights Amendment and argued that it would take away the privileges that women were given in the work place for such things as their capability to bear children and their susceptibility to certain “poisons” found in the workplace (Hill and Kelley Debate). Florence Kelley, a Female Reformists argued that because men and women are inherently different that women will “always need many laws different from those needed by men” (Hill and Kelley Debate). Finally in the Modern era the two parties in this debate are the Feminists and the New Right. The Feminists are in complete support of the Equal Rights Amendment, full political and economic equality, sexual freedom, equal work for equal pay, and human equality. The Feminist protest for a woman’s right to an abortion, child care, and equal education. Their strategy was to bring about change through legal and political means, which is of course why they would support the Equal Rights Amendment so passionately. On the opposing side would be the New Right who argued for traditional gender roles and stoppage of the Equal Rights Amendment. Activists such as Phyllis Schlafly argued that the Equal Rights Amendment would force women to enlist in the draft, compromising their femininity (Phyllis Schlafly handout). They would also argue that the adoption of the Equal Rights Amendment would guarantee homosexual marriages and abortions (Phyllis Shlafly handout).
I personally see no reason for the Equal Rights Amendment not to get adopted into the Constitution. I agree that if passed it would clear out all the laws that have been discriminatory in the aspect of gender. Understanding that some of those laws have actually have served as a privilege for women, but if equality is the goal then gender privileges could not be allowed. In these days where equality is sought after so vigorously I feel the Equal Rights Amendment is the perfect addition because it not only fights for the rights of women but ultimately it fights for the rights of all humans.
I read the arguments opposing the amendment and it simply does not convince me. I understand that if the Equal Rights Amendment was to get passed that women would then be required to join the draft but we already have many...