This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Taylorism Essay

1831 words - 8 pages

Topic 1: Scientific Management

How was Taylorism received outside the USA? Contrast the reception of Taylorism in two different countries, one western, one Asian, in your answer.

Introduction

Before looking in to whether scientific management has always been successful outside of USA, there is a need to look at scientific management when Frederick W. Taylor first introduced it in the late 1890s and early 1900s. Started experimenting at Midvale Steel Company where he tried to improve the efficiency of the workers for increased productivity, he has then already faced the problems and critics of his scientific management that it is still facing today. This includes the time study of ...view middle of the document...

In contrast, the spread of Taylorism to the “modern sector” in many developing countries and its development in many centrally planned economies as well did not lead to a comparable development of productivity levels or of mass consumption in those countries.

The reception of Taylorism has never been fully positive till now, it is an age-old debate between supporters and critics who have their fair share of points in their arguments. This paper however is not to judge and evaluate Taylor and scientific management, but to discuss if it is successful in its application outside of USA. It is also important to note that scientific management as mentioned in this paper has already been evolved and refined in their uses not only in mechanical operations but other activities as well. This is due to the fact that Taylor’s scientific management has merely provided a stepping-stone for many others to replicate and improvise its methods during this scientific management era. Since then, many other theorists have come out their own systems and theories that largely define what is scientific management today.

Scientific Management in Russia

Russia (then USSR) was at its premature stages in their industrial revolution where the majority of the population was in agriculture; there was a need for a system to get the industry going. Lenin, who was aware of Taylor’s work, decided to bring scientific management into Russia’s industry. Components such as ‘functional foreman’ and an institute was formed to experiment with Taylorism were introduced (Wren 1980), but this did not really took off, there was only a few improvements due to the Communist party’s hostility towards capitalist ideas, socialist inefficiency and resistance to change (Locke 1982). Cultural differences affected the success of Taylor’s ideas in Russia, as described by Kerzhentsev (cited in Armstrong) Russians were critical of applying Western European and American methods and that all foreign specialists were seen as capitalists who would sabotage the socialists effort of Russia. This was evident as there were idle factories and incompetent workers who were unskilled and untrained, who were unable to operate the new technology that was brought in to improve the industry. Taylor’s idea was unable to succeed because of the ideological fact that the Russians were operating in an environment where there is a class divide between the working and owning class, whereas Taylor’s idea requires the labour and management to be working together towards a common goal. Therefore, Russia at that point of time was unable to adapt quickly to the different working culture that is required for Taylor’s idea to succeed.

While trying to emulate Taylor’s work in Russia did not come to a success, scientific management did however succeed in the end. This was credited to the efforts of Walter N. Polakov, who increased Russia’s machine tool output by a reported 400% (Wren 1980). He did so by introducing Gantt...

Other Papers Like Taylorism

The Human Side to Introducing New Technology; a Historical Perspective

5852 words - 24 pages Historical Perspective. Contents Introduction 1. Taylor and Taylorism. 2.1. Concepts and Principles. 2.2. Criticisms of Taylor. 2.3. Effects of Taylorism. 2. The Historical Effects of Introducing New Technology 3.4. The Effects on Operators` Jobs. 3.5. Effect on Support Jobs. 3.6. Effects on Supervisors Jobs. 3.7. Effects on Managerial Jobs. 3.8. The Impact on the Organizational

Miss Essay

1809 words - 8 pages understand the principles and impact of: Organisational Behaviour • Bureaucracy • Management • To understand the principles and impact of: • Division of labour • Scientific management/Taylorism • Fordism • To explore the arguments surrounding ‘deskilling’ and labour process 3 The Obsession with Organization Before the factory system production took place primarily in cottages – the ‘putting out’ system and small workshops. Output was

Critically Assess the Ways in Which F.W. Taylor's Scientific Management Theory Has Influenced Has Influenced Contemporary Management Practice

2992 words - 12 pages does seem to have a logical base to it. One such popular food chain that follows Taylor’s principles is McDonalds. McDonalds is a major advocate of Taylorism. They follow an assembly line which is similar to that of Ford. They employ people who are good for the task at hand and they are not pressured into something they are not good and hence most of their process is standardized and broken down. In the words of George Ritzer (1993) ”hamburger

Business Law

1676 words - 7 pages employees. Will autonomy decline with the Taylorism approach, the basic principles of Fredrick Taylor’s (1911) concept of scientific management include developing a scientific approach for each element of a person’s job, scientifically selecting, training, teaching and develop workers, encourageing cooperation between workers and managers so that each job can be accomplished in a standard, scientifically determined way, divideing work and

Critiques of Theorists

614 words - 3 pages /584820/Frederick-W-Taylor [ 3 ]. Wigfall, 131 [ 4 ]. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1387100/Taylorism [ 5 ]. Katia Caldari. Alfred Marshall’s Critical Analysis of Scientific Management. Euro. J. History of Economic Thought 14:1. Page 58, March 2007. [ 6 ]. Robbins/Judge, Page 23. [ 7 ]. http://www.vectorstudy.com/management-gurus/henri-fayol [ 8 ]. Robbins/Judge, 6. [ 9 ]. Wigfall, 41. [ 10 ]. http://www.vectorstudy.com/management-gurus/henri-fayol

Management

982 words - 4 pages used in a variety of extends nowadays. Scientific management becomes more sophistication after several times of development since last century. No matter how it changes, the basic principles of Taylorism are always alive and fit well with the current society and the future.

Contribution of Taylor and Frayol to Management Theory

3460 words - 14 pages of the goals of Taylorism, and represents a victory for his theories. However, tactfully choosing to ignore the still controversial process of automating human work is also politically expedient, so many still say that practical problems caused by Taylorism led to its replacement by the human relations school of management in 1930. Others (Braverman 1974) insisted that human relations did not replace Taylorism but that both approaches are rather

Miss

812 words - 4 pages system was used to reward people when they reached a certain target (Buelens et al, 2011). Critiques of Taylorism mostly come from humanistic side. Although social scientists agree that modern management methods have led to greater material wealth and thus a higher standard of life, they question the price people have to pay for this greater standard of life. For example, in Foxconn, employees often suffer inhumane treatment. Because of great

Public Administration

1006 words - 5 pages the diverse populations and every populations helps there own. References Rimer, E. (1993). Organization theory and frederick taylor - taylorism transfo. Public Administration Review, 53(3), 270-270. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.library.capella.edu/docview/197165236?accountid=27965 DiPrete, T. A. (1991). Human resources, personnel, and organizational behavior -- frederick taylor and the public administration community: A

Gary Hamel's Reinventing Management For The 21st Century

909 words - 4 pages planning, organizing, and motivating resources was modified and adapted into what we know as management today. With the help of many modern management contributors like Frederick Winslow Taylor (founded Taylorism) whose theory of management that analyzes and synthesizes work flows. Taylor’s research is still heavily revered to this day. Another important figure is Henri Fayol, the father of the school of Systematic Management, who introduced to

Describe How Either Taylor or Ford Changed Organisational Management and Workplace Practices. Critically Analyse How They Continue to Influence Contemporary Organizational Behaviour

2449 words - 10 pages can be argued that Taylor’s greatest contribution to capitalism was not the revolution itself, but how Taylorism brought about the era of competition and syncretism with contrasting or corresponding concepts on organisational management and workplace practices, particularly Fordism, which arguably extended the dynamics of Taylorism centered on the use of assembly line. This essay will examine how Fordism developed organisational management

Related Essays

Frederick Taylor And His Contribution To Industrial Management

1060 words - 5 pages are also known simply as "Taylorism". Four Principles of Scientific Management Taylor's four principles are as follows: 1. Replace working by "rule of thumb," or simple habit and common sense, and instead use the scientific method to study work and determine the most efficient way to perform specific tasks. 2. Rather than simply assign workers to just any job, match workers to their jobs based on capability and motivation, and train them to

Quik Clips Management Approaches Essay

2365 words - 10 pages Clips, the objective of this report is to provide specific managerial approaches to address these challenges. This report benchmarks these managerial approaches against theoretical evidence from the classical viewpoint of ‘scientific management’ pioneered by Fredrick W Taylor and Frank and Lillian Gilbreth. Scientific management (also called ‘taylorism’) focuses on worker efficiency via the scientific study of work methods. The

Great Historians Of Managerial Research Essay

1137 words - 5 pages to the idea of management. “Taylorism is also another idea that Frederick Taylor created that was backed by his own book. He used the scientific theory and other methods in order to produce proven advancements in management. The idea of “Time and Motion” meant for managers to hire people that would be the most efficient. Employees that were efficient got much more work done and were much more valuable to the company. “A Fair Day’s Pay For a

Scientific Management Essay

1205 words - 5 pages major criticism of Taylorism is the degradation of skilled labour. For instance, Friedmann alleged Taylor of manipulating a workers’ aptitude excessively and turning him “into an automaton and a moron” (Friedmann, 1967 P43). An intensive job is reduced to the least amount of expertise needed, then the employer is able to foot the least amount of wages and therefore it also reduces the effort to train the worker to perform that task. Consequently