Vanessa De La Torre
We are comparing the group that has the bullying prevention program and promotes being nice to your peers and the group that has no bullying intervention program. The first group is about preventing bullying in school settings and being nice to their peers. The second group has no bullying prevention program thus we compare them to each other to see how it differs from the first group. Our independent variable is the bullying prevention program and our dependent variable is the positive interaction reported in the schools. We will see how the bullying prevention program changes the attitude of the students to be nicer to one another. Our dependent variables data ...view middle of the document...
The mean for group one, the bullying prevention program that promotes being nice to your peers, is 83.79 and its standard deviation is 34.22. The mean for group two, the one with no bullying prevention program, is 32.26 and its standard deviation is 20.00. We can use the independent sample t-test. The reason we use the independent t-test is because it compares two population means in order to see if there is any significant difference between sample groups. And in this case we have two sample groups that are being compared. The alpha value used is the default value of .05. The degree of freedom is 59. The critical t-value (when the df is rounded to 60) is 1.671. Our calculated t-value is about 6.99. This shows that in fact we reject the null hypothesis. Since the critical t-value falls to the right of the table.
These results suggest that bullying prevention programs implemented in schools are effective and result in less bullying within the academic setting. Versus schools that did not have prevention programs and therefore displayed a higher rate of bullying in schools. Based on data we concluded, there are lower levels of positive interaction in schools without the extra programs that promoted students to be nice to their peers, in comparison to schools with the program that had higher levels of positive interactions. Based on these results we believe these results are accurate because by having a prevention program in schools it is the best way to address bullying. It is more effective to educate kids on the dangers of bullying and therefore it is easier to stop it before it starts.