This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

State Or Federal Tort Claims Act Of 1946 Paper

1507 words - 7 pages

State or Federal Tort Claims
December 15, 2014

State or Federal Tort Claims
The Constitution of the United States has the amendments in place to protect the citizens from the violation of his or her rights by the government. The Federal Tort Claim Act of 1946 is enacted to ensure the citizens of the United States will receive the proper compensation or if the citizens want to sue the federal government. The Federal Tort Claim Act of 1946 will provide the citizens of the United States enough cushion to go around the immunity for federal employees. Before the enactment of the Federal Tort Claim Act of 1946, the citizens would have no possible way of suing the federal government ...view middle of the document...

Allowing the government to have sovereign immunity will only serve the purpose that protects the government time and money from demising (Watson, 2012).The sole purpose to enact a state tort claim is to remove the immunity law that protects the government and employees from lawsuits.
According to (Watson, 2012) in the State of Texas the local justice is members of the criminal justice system with limits on liability by participating an activity that causes harm or potential harm to a citizen. In layman’s term, Texas Tort Claim Act will not waive the immunity of the government or the employees from claims arising from police protection or firefighters (Watson, 2014). The security personnel, who have employment though the federal government, will not have immunity; however, the only way he or she can have immunity is to work as a state law enforcement agent or emergency worker. Some federal and state employees will have to escort government officials, such as politicians to keep him or her safe; however, it will not grant immunity from civil or criminal liability.

Police officers and emergency workers who fail to act within the boundaries of the law will be subject to criminal or sovereign immunity removal due to his or her negligent behavior. The policymakers will have immunity from civil liability. This means the policy that a policymaker creates and enacts, because harm to a citizen will not waive the immunity of the policy maker. A policy maker will not be liable for the harm that comes to a citizen through the policy. The Discretionary Activity Exception within the Texas Tort Claims Act will regulate whether or not to waive the immunity.

The Discretionary Activity Exception in the Texas Tort Claims Act will not waive the immunity of state workers; however, it creates various guidelines that include civil liability (Figley, 2009). The government will have the authority to determine if an employee will waive his or her immunity. For example in an emergency situation the ambulance or police run over a pedestrian on the way to an emergency, with flashing lights and sirens, the government will have to make a determination if it is negligence or not. The government will have to determine if the pedestrian is at fault. So if the pedestrian walks in front of the ambulance or police, the emergency responder will not be at fault. This means the pedestrian can not sue; however, if it is an emergency responder’s fault he or she can receive a lawsuit.
Within the Texas Tort Claims Act government agencies cannot be liable; however, if the plaintiff can establish an exception, it will allow him or her to gain a lawsuit against the government or employee. A teacher, a police officer, EMT, and firefighters a plaintiff can name in a lawsuit; however, the plaintiff will need credible evidence to begin a lawsuit. A state or federal employee will have a limit on the amount a plaintiff can receive. Citizens who sue a government or state employee will...

Other Papers Like State or Federal Tort Claims Act of 1946 Paper

State Of Confusion Paper

519 words - 3 pages , there are citizens of different states, the case may be brought to a federal court. This will result in a fair trial as the plaintiff or defendant will not have the upper hand in his or her individual state court. Cheeseman (2010) states “The reason for providing diversity of citizenship jurisdiction to federal courts was to prevent state court bias against nonresidents” (p. 41). The federal court, however, must use the applicable state law when

State of Confusion Paper

1505 words - 7 pages State Of Confusion Paper State of Confusion Paper This paper will be reviewing the case brought upon the state of Confusion by Tanya Trucker, who owns a trucking company in the state of Denial. The state of Confusion has enacted a statute requiring all trucks and towing trailers who use its highways to use a B-type truck hitch. The problem is that Tanya Trucker would have to purchase these hitches to go through this one state or go around the

Roles of State & Federal Governments in Employment Regulation

1724 words - 7 pages Roles of State & Federal Governments in Employment Regulation Angela McIntosh Sullivan University Employment Law HRL404 Abstract This paper will provide an overview of the State and Federal regulations in employment and discuss relevant employment regulations. The findings will explain on how in today work environments that the business climate of companies seem to subject to a wide

Bus 415: State of Confusion Paper

1321 words - 6 pages Wisconsin. Specifically, the court found it was illegal for state officials to interfere with the work of U.S. Marshals enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act or to order the release of federal prisoners held for violation of that Act. The Supreme Court reasoned that because the Supremacy Clause established federal law as the law of the land, the Wisconsin courts could not nullify the judgments of a federal court. The Supreme Court held that under Article

Constitution and System of the State Paper

863 words - 4 pages people of the State shall be vested in a General Assembly. “It consist of the Senate and House of Representatives, but the people reserve to themselves the power to propose legislative measures, laws and amendments to the Constitution, and to enact or reject the same at the polls independent of the General Assembly; and also reserve the power, at their own option to approve or reject at the polls any entire act or any item of an appropriation bill

Implementation of the Human Rights Act 1998 Has Impacted Upon Many Areas of Tort Law. Choose One of These Areas and Assess the Act’s Impact. 

2490 words - 10 pages Rights Act 1998 in Section 6 (1).  Tort Liability has impacted the human rights in several ways which in some extent can overlap with one another. One of the reason is that some tort claims are influenced by interest of the public which can be concerning. To certain extent, the norms of human rights can cause to re-evaluate of what the public wants or can be beneficial for them, which can affect the outcome of all individuals. In the case D v

New Deal: Welfare State or Savior of Capitalsm

1387 words - 6 pages . Local laws vary, but in some areas, such provisions in a lease are unenforceable. Some state laws govern automatic renewal clauses, for example, some states require such clauses to be initiated by a tenant, or require notice of renewal to be provided by the landlord a number of days in advance, however, localities within a state may also regulate such clauses, so that they may be enforceable under state, but not local law. “Nobody wants the

Injustices On American Children: Lack Of Equality And Funds Allocated By The Local, State, And Federal Governments

1617 words - 7 pages in an old roller skating rink, is ninety percent black (Kozol 87). This is then compared to a suburban school in Chicago, New Trier High, where only 1.2 percent of the population is non-white (Kozol 66). Segregation is inevitable as long as the governments continue to use property value as their basis for funding. And until state or local governments attempt to integrate the lower and higher-class students, and try to improve the condition of the

Boston Tea Party: Act of Terrorism or Patriotism?

580 words - 3 pages resistance it exemplified. Was the Boston Tea Party an act of patriotism or terrorism? Many people have discussed the Boston Tea Party as being an act of patriotism. The people believe that since the Boston Tea Party was for a good cause and the fight for independence, that their acts were condoned. The Boston Tea Party was an act of terrorism. The Sons of Liberty damaged property that wasn’t theirs. They threw over 300 crates of tea that wasn’t

The Impact of Computer in Our Modern Days Organization ( a Case Study of Federal College of Education Technical Asaba, Delta State)

5420 words - 22 pages the administering of the questionnaire to the people selected in Federal college of education(Technical) Asaba, Delta State. 3.6 ADMINISTRATION OF THE INSTRUMENT The research administered the instrument personally to the respondents in the process of administering the questionnaire; the research met some individual communicating through telephone and internet. 3.7 DESCRIPTION OF INSTRUMENT USED Questionnaire was the main instrument used in

Paper On Healthcare, The Good And Bad Of State Sponsored Healthcare Programs. 800 Words

913 words - 4 pages 820 wordsThis paper will attempt to argue that both healthcare should be given to citizens of the United States and that healthcare should not be given to our citizens.Not all people can afford health care. Everyone needs health care, therefore it should be guaranteed to all U.S. citizens. On the other hand, healthcare is wildly expensive and would be difficult to accomplish guaranteed healthcare for all. So, taxes must be raised in order to

Related Essays

State And Federal Systems Paper

1102 words - 5 pages INTRODUCTIONThere are two different types of employment laws that exist in the United States, which are federal and state. The federal law is a general law that each of the states must follow. The state law is usually based off of the federal law and may or may not differ. The state laws only pertain to individuals who reside in that state and may be different from state to state. In this paper, it will compare some state and federal

Synopsis Of Tort Cases Paper

1753 words - 8 pages , identify potential defendants, why they are defendants, the elements of the tort claims that constitute the plaintiffs’ claims, any defenses that the defendants may assert, and how the case will be resolved with legal reasoning. Scenario 1 What tort actions do you see? Intentional: Assault is the threat of immediate harm or offensive contact or any action that arouses reasonable apprehension of eminent of harm. Battery an unauthorized

State Of Confusion Paper

1149 words - 5 pages lay out the ground rules of the law, and when disputes arise, state and federal courts interpret the statutes more clearly. The Supremacy Clause establishes that the federal constitution, treaties, federal laws, and federal regulations are the supreme law of the land. State and local laws that conflict with valid federal law are unconstitutional. Congress may designate a federal statute regulate a specific area or activity. No state or local

State Of Confusion Paper

1146 words - 5 pages the additional expenses it would incur. The court that would have jurisdiction over Tanya’s case would be the federal court. A case may be brought in federal court if there is diversity of citizenship (Cheeseman, 2010). The reason for providing diversity of citizenship jurisdiction to federal courts was to prevent state court bias against nonresidents (Cheeseman, 2010). Constitutional or Unconstitutional The interstate commerce is a commerce that