This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

State Of Confusion Paper

519 words - 3 pages

State of Confusion Paper
University of Phoenix

State of Confusion Paper

Tanya Trucker, owner of a trucking company, is displeased with the new statute in the state of Confusion requiring trucks and towing trailers to have a B-type hutch installed to their vehicle. Unfortunately, this new hitch can be acquired only through one manufacturer in the state of Confusion, and vehicles that do not comply must take a route other than Confusion’s. This new statute will have a financial impact on trucking business throughout the country, especially Tanya Trucker’s business as it will incur additional expenses to comply with the statute. She plans to take legal action against the state of Denial for the stature to be reversed.
Jurisdiction over Tanya’s Suit
Tanya Trucker lives in ...view middle of the document...

41). The federal court, however, must use the applicable state law when making the judgment.
Confusion’s Statute
Confusion’s statute is unconstitutional as states should not impose fees over the ports of another.
According to the Constitution’s Section I, article 9, “No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of
Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another; nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another” (Cheeseman, p. 87). The state of Confusion’s requirement for an installment of B-type truck hitches for all trucks passing through the state constitutes as a payment of duties. In addition, the state of Confusion’s stature restricts truck drivers from acquiring the B-type hitches elsewhere, as they are only available through one manufacturer in the state of confusion.
Provisions of the State of Confusion
Because the federal government has not made any attempts to standardize truck hitches used on states’ highways, Tanya Trucker’s compliance with all federal regulated requirements is enough. According to Section 8 of the United States of America Constitution, the federal government regulates commerce among states. This is why Tanya is most likely going to win her case; the legislation is within the province of the federal government, not the state of Confusion’s.
Conclusion
When a business owner understands his or her rights regarding his or her business, it can be the difference between success and failure. Because Tanya Trucker knew that it was unconstitutional for the State of confusion to require specific hitches to be installed on all trucks using their roads, and only providing one manufacturer to install them, she saved her business money and distress.

References
Cheeseman, H.R. (2010). The Legal Environment of Business and Online Commerce (6th ed.). : Prentice Hall

Other Papers Like State Of Confusion Paper

State Of Confusion Essay

2075 words - 9 pages state of Confusion to use a particular hitch manufactured by a manufacturer in Confusion. Tanya Trucker is not willing to absorb the additional costs to her company and believes this is wrong to impose such an act and is seeking to overturn this statute. This paper will discuss the steps Tanya Trucker will take in her legal actions and whether or not she is likely to prevail in her suit (University of Phoenix, 2010). Court of Jurisdiction

State of Confusion Essay

1128 words - 5 pages . Reference: Cheeseman, H. (2010). Constitutional Law for Business and E-Commerce (6th ed.). : Prentice Hall. According to Cheeseman (2010). (Cheeseman, 2010). Cheeseman (2010) stated, (p. Page 71). (2011). Necessary and Proper Clause. Retrieved from http://www.answers.com/topic/necessary-and-proper-clause (,2011). The ( 2011) website According to ( 2011), (Constitutional Provisions, para. Page 1). Res415 Syllabus State of Confusion Paper.

State of Confusion

992 words - 4 pages State of Confusion Paper This paper will cover a law suit that Tanya Trucker is bringing to the State of Confusion court system. Tanya lives in the State of Denial. The state of Confusion has enacted a statute requiring all trucks and towing trailers who use its highways to use a B-type truck hitch. Tanya, who owns a trucking company, is concerned with the cost of changing her towing hitches will adversely affect her business. Before Tanya

State of Confusion

1329 words - 6 pages fairly when problems arise (National Motorists Association, 2011). The State of Confusion requires Tanya Trucker and any other trucker to use a specific trailer hitch, when they drive through the state. Tanya Trucker is the owner of a trucking company, and she is upset that the Federal Government has not made any attempts to regulate the truck hitches used in the nation’s highways. In this paper the subject to analyze and determine what court

State Of Confusion

1244 words - 5 pages State of Confusion Paper University of Phoenix State of Confusion Paper Tanya Trucker is an owner of a trucking company in the state of Denial, and some of her truck drivers need to go through state of Confusion. Tanya Trucker is upset about the fact of every time her trucks need to go through the state of Confusion they need to be equipped with a specific trailer hitch, which is made only in the state of Confusion. Tanya Trucker is

State of Confusion - 997 words

997 words - 4 pages State of Confusion Wes Herode August 24, 2010 University of Phoenix BUS 415 State of Confusion The state of Confusion has recently enacted a statute that effects several different parties. Confusion stands to benefit from a stimulated economy in the scenario set forth. However, trucking company owners like Tanya Trucker will obviously be effected negatively. Without the new B-type hitch, her drivers will either have to stop and have the

State of Confusion - 889 words

889 words - 4 pages State of Confusion BUS415-Business Law October 20, 2010 This paper will review and discuss a case involving a statute that the State of Confusion has enacted upon. This particular statute applies to all truck and towing trailers that use this state’s highways. Trucks and towing trailers are to have a B-type hitch installed on their units in order to access Confusion’s highways or face having to drive an alternate route around the state

State of Confusion - 1124 words

1124 words - 5 pages State of Confusion BUS 415 Business Law November 1, 2010 State of Confusion Tanya Trucker owns an out-of-state trucking company and resides in the State of Denial. For the purpose of conducting her business, she frequently finds the need to drive her truck across other states; including the State of Confusion. Recently, the State of Confusion ratified a state law demanding all towing trailers and trucks traveling through the State of

State of Confusion - 732 words

732 words - 3 pages commerce, however, remain contested, as the State of Confusion and Tanya Trucker’s situation indicate. Facts The State of Confusion enacted a statute that forces all trucks and towing trailers that use its highways to use a B-type truck hitch. The hitches are only made by one company in Confusion. The result of this law is that all truckers who want to drive through Confusion must stop outside the state’s borders, install the B-type hitches or

State Of Confusion

665 words - 3 pages Situation The state of Confusion enacted a statute requiring all trucks and towing trailers that use its highways to use a B-type truck hitch. This hitch is manufactured by only one manufacturer in Confusion. The result of this statute is that any trucker who wants to drive through Confusion must stop and have the new hitch installed, or drive around Confusion. The federal government has not made any attempt to regulate the truck hitches used

State of Confusion - 1189 words

1189 words - 5 pages State of Confusion Geoffrey Goebel BUS/415 March 21, 2012 Tracy Bomar-Howze, JD, Esq. State of Confusion The state of Confusion endorsed a statute that requires trucks and tractor trailers that use its freeways to attach a B-type truck hitch. The hitch in question is produced by one particular company in Confusion. This statute mandates that any trucker

Related Essays

State Of Confusion Paper

1146 words - 5 pages her suit and my reasoning behind it. Finally, I will discuss in detail the stages of a civil suit. State of Confusion Paper Tanya owns a trucking company in the state of Denial, and is filing suit against the state of Confusion because of their statute requiring all trucks and towing trailers to use a specific manufactures truck hitch when using their highways in Confusion. Tanya is filing this suit because it affects her business, and

State Of Confusion Paper

1505 words - 7 pages State Of Confusion Paper State of Confusion Paper This paper will be reviewing the case brought upon the state of Confusion by Tanya Trucker, who owns a trucking company in the state of Denial. The state of Confusion has enacted a statute requiring all trucks and towing trailers who use its highways to use a B-type truck hitch. The problem is that Tanya Trucker would have to purchase these hitches to go through this one state or go around the

State Of Confusion Paper

1149 words - 5 pages law regulating the activity is valid if there is such a statute. (Cheeseman 2010) The state of Confusion enacted a statute requiring all trucks and towing trailers to use a specific truck hitch when using its highways. The required truck hitch can only be purchased in Confusion from its sole manufacturer. A trailer hitch is made up of two parts, a trailer knob and a coupler, or bowl socket. The trailer hitch ball is a metal ball that is mounted

Bus 415: State Of Confusion Paper

1321 words - 6 pages Running head: TANYA TRUCKER VS THE STATE OF CONFUSION Leonard C. Anderson, Sr. BUS 415 Professor: Frank Poe February 26, 2012 University of Phoenix TANYA TRUCKER VS THE STATE OF CONFUSION 2 Introduction Tanya Trucker has decided to file a suit against the state of Confusion to overturn a statue that the state enacted that required all trucks