This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

“Singapore’s Separation From The Federation Was Inevitable.” How Far Do You Agree With This Statement? Discuss

522 words - 3 pages

Question) “Singapore’s separation from the federation was
inevitable.” How far do you agree with this statement? Discuss.

I agree with this statement to a large extent as during the two years
when Singapore was part of Malaysia as there was an irreconcilable
political difference between PAP and UMNO. Malaysia also thought of
Singapore as an economical rival. The only thing that kept the two
parties together for that very 2 years was because Singapore thought
that by uniting with Malaya, communism problems would be
automatically resolved, Malaya thought so too. Therefore I agree to a
large extent that Singapore’s separation from the federation was

Political difference between PAP and UMNO was one of the reasons why
separation between the federation, ...view middle of the document...

Therefore, leaving Malaysia would help to protect the political
interest of Singapore.

Another reason why separation between Singapore and the federation
was inescapable was because of the economic rivalry between Malaysia
and Singapore. Singapore was doing much better than Malaysia in
economy because it had the most popular port in the whole of South-
East Asia. Singapore was earning more than Malaysia thought she would
and this was affecting and threatening Malaysian business. This
rivalry made it even harder to maintain a good relationship with
Malaysia as there would be much future unhappiness between the 2
countries and so as to lessen the economic feud, Malaysia increased
the toll on Singapore’s economy and this led to more unhappiness
between the 2 countries. Therefore, in a bid to protect Malaysia’s
economy, it was unavoidable for the separation.

However, the communism problems in Singapore helped to keep Malaysia
together as Kuala Lumpur feared that communism would take over
Singapore and by being together, Kuala Lumpur would have more control
over the situation. Singapore’s political party, PAP, also wanted to
rid Singapore from communists. So, Singapore separation from Malaysia
could be avoided but there were many other reasons tagged along for
the separation between Singapore and Malaysia. Therefore, it is very
hard to keep a close relationship with Malaysia with only a few
reasons compared to the many other reasons that appeals for the

Thus, because of the problem with political and economical
challenges, it is very hard to avoid separation with Malaysia as
there were little advantages to keep the relationship. The few
advantages were trivial compared to the disadvantages that the merger
had brought, therefore I agree to a large extent that Singapore’s
separation from the federation was inevitable.

Other Papers Like “Singapore’s Separation from the Federation Was Inevitable.” How Far Do You Agree with This Statement? Discuss

War Was the Most Significant Factor in Causing Change in Russia from 1856-1964. How Far Do You Agree?

2246 words - 9 pages the Tsar. The final factor which was significant in causing change in Russia during this period was foreign influence, as the ideology and power of the west would have had an impact on how Russia was managed to compete with them. The production of the Hydrogen Bomb (1953) and the Space Race (1961) show that Russia were willing to compete with the USA and others. However, the desire for peace, the end of war, conflict and associated famine in a

How far do you agree with the view that America was a land of opportunity during the 1920s?"

1732 words - 7 pages "How far do you agree with the view that America was a land of opportunity during the 1920s?" Explain your answer using sources 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and your own knowledge. (40 marks) The 1920s are widely known as the 'Boom Era', or the 'Roaring Twenties' and a "decade of lively economic growth" (Source 3), due to the sheer economic success and advancement, and the emergence of the motor car, Hollywood, consumerism and

“Generals Win Battles, Logistics Win Wars.” How Far Do You Agree With This Statement With Regard To Land Warfare 1792-1914

1061 words - 5 pages foraging system had failed the French. As there was the absences of the agricultural revolution in Russia, and the Russians had made sure that the French would not survive, had scorched the Earth, so even with the little crops that they had, the French could not have it. This had resulted in the French manpower dwindling from 800,000 to 20,000, this had been such an overwhelming lost, that they had never recovered. The Russians had played their

How Far Do You Agree That a Study of Russia in the Period from 1855 to 1956 Suggests That Change Was Always Imposed from Above?

1048 words - 5 pages How far do you agree that a study of Russia in the period from 1855 to 1956 suggests that change was always imposed from above? Throughout the period 1855-1956, it’s clear that with both the Tsars and the Bolsheviks, change was, often implemented from both the leaders and the people, However, under both Tsars and the Bolsheviks, they were ruthlessly prevented from striking, having trade unions or really having any control over the future

‘Investment and Support from Foreign Powers Was the Main Reason the Weimar Republic Survived in the 1920s.’ How Far Do You Agree?

752 words - 4 pages ‘Investment and support from foreign powers was the main reason the Weimar Republic survived in the 1920s.’ How far do you agree? During the 1920s, there were many ups and downs for Weimar Germany and to start with they struggled and bounced between governments, especially with hyperinflation in 1923. But with the help of foreign support, Weimar was able to make it to the 1930s. It could be said that the Locarno Pact contributed greatly to the

.How Far Do You Agree with the View That the Development of the Cold War in the Period 1945-50 Was the Result of Stalin’s Foreign Policy?

3210 words - 13 pages .How far do you agree with the view that the development of the Cold War in the period 1945-50 was the result of Stalin’s foreign policy? Development of the Cold War, in the five years between 1945 and 1950, could be argued as taking place for a number of reasons and due to various individuals. It could be easy to simply site Stalin as the main reason responsible for it’s outbreak and growth, clear through his approach on communist expansion

How Far Do You Agree with the View That the Development of the Cold War in the Period 1945-50 Was the Result of Stalin’s Foreign Policy?

3182 words - 13 pages Germany and Berlin were split into Western and Eastern zones; recognised that this could not be a long term solution, the West wanted to rebuild Germany and create a stable democracy and economy – Stalin on the other hand was more concerned with making Germany pay to the full extent. Source S, an extract of Geoffrey Roberts’ ‘Stalin Wars’, reinforces the fact that Stalin’s view and inability to agree with the West over the German question, “was

How Far Do You Agree That the Most Important Reason for Wolsey’s Fall from Power Was His Failure to Gain a Divorce for Henry Viii?

957 words - 4 pages The most important reason for Wolsey’s fall from power was his failure to gain a divorce for Henry VIII, how far do you agree? Wolsey’s dismissal from Henry’s court came in September 1529, though Wolsey had a plethora of failures before, his fall his failure to get a divorce for Henry VIII proved to be the most significant. This is because Wolsey’s strength of position depended on whether he got Henry what he wanted and the divorce was the

Some Readers Have Commented That Mary Shelly Presents the Creature as More Human Than His Creator. How Far Do You Agree with This View?

1547 words - 7 pages Some readers have commented that Mary Shelly presents the creature as more human than his creator. How far do you agree with this view? To some extent I agree with this statement, but there is also a point of disagreement. Shelly introduces the creature into the novel with physical human characteristics, who soon begins to learn the human language and feel human emotions and senses such as love, kindness, pain and anger. The creature takes

‘Tsar Remained Essentially Unchanged Upon the Eve of Its Destruction’. How Far Do You Agree with This View of Tsarist Autocracy Between 1855-1917?

1320 words - 6 pages ‘Tsarism remained essentially unchanged upon the eve of its destruction’. How far do you agree with this view of Tsarist autocracy between 1855-1917? At first glance, it would appear that change was the dominant theme in Russian history between 1855-1917—in 1913, Tsar Nicholas and his family celebrated three hundred years of autocratic rule by his family, the Romanovs. Yet, just four years later, he was forced to abdicate and was then

'Cb's Sensational Effects Are Always Grounded in the Everyday World'. How Far and in What Ways Do You Agree with This View of 'Jane Eyre'?

984 words - 4 pages 'CB's sensational effects are always grounded in the everyday world'. How far and in what ways do you agree with this view of 'Jane Eyre'? A primary way that the ‘sensational effects’ in ‘Jane Eyre’ are ‘always grounded in the everyday world’ is through Jane’s explanation of supernatural events. Additionally, the shocks and hardships of Lowood School, twinned with the treatment of Jane by Brocklehurst in what seems like a routinely manner

Related Essays

Opposition Was The Main Problem Facing Alexander3. How Far Do You Agree With The Statement?

1343 words - 6 pages remarkable by his conservative views, being part of Slavophiles movement. It was easy for him to influence Alexanders views far before he became Tsar and even after his influence kept pursuing the young Tsar. Because of Pobedonoscevs doctrines Alexander believed in order for Russia to modernise it needs to follow old traditions, so he will be safe from repeating his fathers fate. Pobedonoscev taught Alexander that basis of political stability

"Money Is The Root Of All Evil." How Far Do You Agree With This?

563 words - 3 pages a balanced and intelligent life; it can be to his dependents, if he conscientiously provides them with a good home, a proper education, and a fair share of this world's goods. It can be to the world at large, if he had enough of it to give some away to benefit the community of which he is a member. So the love of money accounts for much, perhaps most, though not all evil, yet to take the topic-statement at its face value nonsense. Throughout

“The Rising Tension Between East And West Between 1945 1949 Was Due To Stalin’s Hold Over Eastern Europe” How Far Do You Agree With This View?

1376 words - 6 pages “The rising tension between east and west between 1945-1949 was due to Stalin’s hold over eastern Europe” How far do you agree with this view? (25 marks) Following the Second World War the post war world was left fragile, disrupted and heavily damaged and it was vital that the future of the East and West were determined quickly and correctly as to avoid a rise in underlying tension. Due to the common enemy of Nazism having been removed, the

‘German Aggression Was Responsible For The Outbreak Of A General European War In August 1914.’ How Far Do You Agree With This Judgement?

1246 words - 5 pages aggression caused European war. Joll contrasts with Turner, arguing how the German strategy of aggression via the arms race led to general war; “Arms race, in which all major powers were involved contributed to the sense that war was bound to come, sooner rather than later”. The quote implies that the use of the Arms Race was a major factor towards the inevitable war, also highlighting the aggression of Germany. Additonally, the source indicates