This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Shaw And Barry Essay

1357 words - 6 pages

1. Export capital for production abroad: According to Shaw and Barry, deciding what sort of economic arrangements would best promote human happiness requires the utilitarian to consider many things. It is unethical to export capital for production abroad because this capital can be used for production facilities domestically and by exporting this capital, the opportunity is available for local and domestic use is restricted.
Each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive total system of equal basic liberties compatible with similar system of liberty for all. I believe the principle is saying that we should be free as possible to set the course of our own lives. Social and ...view middle of the document...

The resultant theory is known as "Justice as Fairness", from which Rawls derives his two principles of justice: the liberty principle and the difference principle. In a state where capital goods for production are sent abroad , the distributive justice of making it available to all is lost and hence harms people. The theory defeats the social contract principle .
2. Export commodities which have been banned from sale in the United States:
Any commodity that has been banned for sale in the USA should be banned by all countries. These commodities cannot be sold by any country as one country has banned it. It is totally unethical to export these goods which are banned in to be made available to people regardless of market and profits and is against the ethical lenses of the golden rule of ethics and utilitarianism. Shaw and Barry say rule utilitarianism maintains that the utilitarian standard should be applied not to individual actions but to moral codes as a whole. The rule utilitarian asks what moral code a society should adopt to maximize happiness. The principles that make up that code would be then the basis for distinguishing right actions from wrong actions.
Shaw and Barry state that the kind of good that is banned from sale by USA need not necessarily be banned by other countries because there is no moral grounds of insisting the fact that what may be banned by ne country may be legal for another country based on the maxim what is good for you may be necessarily good for another .the determinant of the same according to Shaw and Barry are as follows :
1) The type of economic ownership.(private, public, mixed)
2) The way of organizing production and distribution in general.
3) The type of authority arrangements within the units of production.
4) The range and character of material incentives.
5) nature and extent of social security and welfare provisions

3. Downsize in the face of economic difficulty: this need not be unethical if the rule of ethics is applied properly. In times of economic difficulties firms have to be downsized but not at a disadvantage to all. Shaw and Barry distinguish two different forms of utilitarianism. These two forms are act utilitarianism, which is the classic and most straight forward version of utilitarianism. We have one and only one moral obligation, the maximization of happiness for everyone concerned, and every action is to be judged according to how well it lives up to this standard. (Shaw & Barry, 2013) It brings the greatest amount of happiness in a particular situation regardless of the consequences. Shaw and Barry say rule utilitarianism maintains that the utilitarian standard should be applied not to individual actions but to moral codes as a whole. The rule utilitarian asks what moral code a society should adopt to maximize happiness. The principles that make up that code would be then being the basis for distinguishing right actions from wrong actions (Shaw & Barry, 2013).
...

Other Papers Like Shaw and Barry

Forms Of Utilitarianism Essay

956 words - 4 pages Shaw and Barry distinguish two different forms of utilitarianism. What are these two forms? Briefly describe each. The first form of utilitarianism was a view by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. They viewed utilitarianism as that a person’s actions are right if they create the most pleasure, and wrong if they do not. Both men believed that pleasure and happiness were equal and considered it the ultimate value. They thought of

Rawls’s and Nozick’s Theory on Distributive Justice

1619 words - 7 pages maximum, allowing to “close the gap”. (Shaw, Barry, & Sansbury, 2009) This will be possible according to Rawls as all rational, self-interested people will seek to maximize the minimum to be better of. They do not want to gamble with their or their children’s future. (Shaw et al. 2009) Nozicks theory on distributive justice is based on minimum government intervention because it enforces yours and mine violation of liberty or freedom. In his theory

Poverty and Pollution

1761 words - 8 pages because of our countries strict guidelines. Running head: POVRTY AND POLLUTION CASE 8 References: Barber, B. (1992) “Lessons from a Third Word” Omni Barry, Brian. (1980) “Do Countries Have a Moral Obligation. The Case of World Poverty” Shaw, William H. (2010 Custom Edition) “Business Ethics”

Business Ethics

1251 words - 6 pages identify the setting of the ethical dilemma, the ethical principles that apply to the dilemma, and how the dilemma was and should have been handled. Ethics defined is “How people try to live their lives according to a standard of ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ behaviour” (Ghillyer, 2010, p.6), and Shaw, Barry, and Sansbury (2009, p.6) states the question “How are we to relate to each other in order to ensure that our individual and collective well-being is

Four Loko - Capitalism and Business

1257 words - 6 pages that the state is justified to “restrict the freedom of individuals for their own good” which essentially implies that the law understands the best interest of the public better than the people themselves (Shaw et al. 2013). Banning Four Loko and similar beverages is an example of legal paternalism because there have been severe cases of alcohol poisoning and as a result the government has banned these types of drinks to minimise and prevent such

Generations in the Workplace

1691 words - 7 pages with a frightening new work ethic: contempt for customers, indifference to quality and service, unrealistic expectations about the world of work, and a get-away-with-what-you-can attitude (Barry & Shaw, 2010, p.197).” From my recent studies, I’ve learned a new depth to ethics and morality in business. Can I justify my answer above and place all the blame on the younger generations? I’ve asked myself a few questions. What fundamental moral

Research Paper

1577 words - 7 pages What do athletes Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire and Rafael Palmeiro have in common? Aside from the fact that they are all-star baseball players, they have all used steroids in their baseball careers(Barousse). Steroids have been a developing problem in sports today. More and more athletes are resorting to using anabolic steroids to get that edge in their respective sport. Anabolic steroids are harmful to the body, and they should not be used in

Affirmative Action

2495 words - 10 pages people today who have never discriminated others to pay for the discrimination committed by someone else in the past, just because they are offsprings of the same group, is unjust, and can lead to reverse discrimination. As Shaw & Barry (2004) argued that people today can’t be expected to atone for the sins of the past. We’re not responsible for them, and in any case, we wouldn’t be compensating those who rightly deserve it. Young African

Rfsdgsdfg

3195 words - 13 pages influencing ethical decision making can be summarized as below: My finding on the application of ethics to the world of business by considering the organization, institutions, laws, governance, decisions and markets can have a considerable impact on the well-being of society in general and individual relationship within this world (Shaw, Barry, Sansbury Chapter 2). Ethics starts with the top in any organization because moral reasoning at the

Ethics in Business: Working as a Controller

3526 words - 15 pages love). Corporate moral responsibility theories include Classical (maximise profits) as defined by Milton Friedman and Theodore Levitt (Shaw & Barry 2004: 210) and Social Responsibility (obligations in addition to profits) as espoused by writers such as Keith Davis and Melvin Anshen (Shaw & Barry 2004: 213). Management of Ethical Issues The question then is how did Hookers and the various parties handle the issues faced by them in this

To What Extent Does Friedman's Efficiency Perspective Provide Foundation For Responsible And Moral International Management Behaviour?

3334 words - 14 pages , Friedman rejects government intervention. He believes that "by allowing the market to operate with only the minimal restrictions necessary to prevent fraud and force, society will maximise its overall economic well-being". (Shaw & Barry,1995) The second limited condition made by Friedman is that consumers have perfect information and that the market is transparent. Only in such a market, consumers have the possibility to find out what kind of

Related Essays

Organizational Behavior Essay

872 words - 4 pages Business Ethics M2 Written Assignment 1. Shaw and Barry distinguish two different forms of utilitarianism. What are these two forms? Briefly describe each and use examples. Shaw and Barry distinguished two different forms of utilitarianism, Act Utilitarianism and Rule Utilitarianism. To understand Utilitarianism in depth we must understand what Utilitarianism means first. “Utilitarianism is the moral doctrine that we should always act to

Business Ethics Essay

819 words - 4 pages 1. Shaw and Barry distinguish two different forms of utilitarianism. What are these two forms? Briefly describe each and use examples. The two forms of utilitarianism are act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism states we must ask ourselves what the consequences of a particular act in a particular situation will be for all those affected. If its consequences bring more net good than those of any alternative course of

Business Ethics Essay

823 words - 4 pages 1. Shaw and Barry distinguish two forms of utilitarianism. What are these two forms? Briefly describe each and use examples. There are two types of utilitarianism, act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is a theory which states an act is morally right if it benefits the greatest number of people; this theory is based on the act itself and accounts for the happiness (benefit) of the majority (even if others are

Ethics Essay

1427 words - 6 pages although companies dump, the onus lies on those individuals who run these companies to be motivated to behave morally and follow a morally sound principle, the principle which Kant describes as not just doing the right thing but doing it as a sense of duty, a desire to act ethically (Shaw, Barry, Issa, & Catley, 2013). As the case states dumping comes in various forms most dangerous being when it affects the health of humans especially children