Scientific Morality In Frankenstein Essay

1277 words - 6 pages

Scientific Morality in Frankenstein

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a late nineteenth century novel about a scientist named Victor Frankenstein who creates a living person from dead body parts and gives it life through the power of magic and alchemy. It serves as a cautionary tale that sheds light on the ethical boundaries of scientific experimentation and the potential consequences of ignoring those boundaries for the sake of knowledge alone. Although science is not inherently good or evil, it can be used as a tool for both in the hands of imperfect humans. Victor Frankenstein betrays the scientific code of ethics when he creates a man that society can never accept.
       Victor, as a ...view middle of the document...

In the scientific field, it often occurs that the consideration of whether or not we should do something is neglected and all that is left to consider is whether or not it is possible to do so. In this way, science can compromise humanity through ignorance and the belief that one could master nature. Victor cannot master his creation; therefore he cannot hope to fully master the ability of creating life.
As there is no intrinsic safeguard within the scientific method as to this question of advancement and what is beneficial to humanity, Frankenstein has a responsibility to regulate his own experimentation, which he ignores until it is too late. He performs his job and ultimately finds it to be lacking in this one area, the tragedy of course being that the knowledge that he gains comes as a result of great human suffering and loss. The following passage shows how Victor Frankenstein has changed the way he perceives scientific morality and the consequences of unregulated scientific experimentation:
Learn from me, if not by my precepts, at least by my example, how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge and how much happier that man is who believes his native town to be the world, than he who aspires to become greater than his nature will allow. (Shelley 31)
Victor Frankenstein regrets what he has done and wishes to wash his hands of it and go back to a simpler time in the past where he had less knowledge and less responsibility. His abandonment of the monster after its creation is out of fear. At first, it is simple fear of the creature’s appearance. Soon, he comes to the realization that he has erred in the creation of the monster, after the fact, and wants it to be gone. The results of his experiment will not prove that easy to erase.
Once the monster has been created, Frankenstein has a responsibility to try and assimilate the monster into the human society, and he abandons it instead out of fear. The monster is not, by any measure, a wholly evil creature. The creature many times attempts to pursue a peaceful life only to be thwarted by humanity’s fear of difference. The fact that the creature kills without remorse does not indicate bad intentions, but rather a lack of a conscience. In fact, the monster does not start out with the hatred of man or Frankenstein; it learns it from the humans that surround it. The issue of morality is also demonstrated from the perspective of the monster:
All men hate the wretched; how then, must I be hated, who am miserable beyond all living things! Yet you, my creator, detest and spurn me, they creature, to whom thou art bound by ties only dissoluble by the annihilation of one of us. (Shelley 65)
It...

Other Papers Like Scientific Morality in Frankenstein

Frankenstein Essay

2067 words - 9 pages be restricted into liminal spaces, creating a world not unlike Aldous Huxley’s A Brave New World. Romantic philosophies have been endorsed in Frankenstein through the downfall of Victor due to scientific endeavour, the travelogue aspects of the story and the extreme emotions prevalent in the characters. This works to reveal the cracks in my own hegemonic, habitual understanding, confirming my personal romantic belief that life should be

Frankenstein Essay

2019 words - 9 pages nature, the theme of technology in Frankenstein is represented as a threat to the precious value of the environment. Frankenstein demonstrates this cautionary belief in the text when Victor reveals, “once we upon the brink…restrained our inquiries?” The use of a rhetorical question stimulates the reader to question the morality of scientific endeavour and whether or not humans should “sport with life”. In comparison, at the time of

Frankenstein or Creature More Deserving of Sympathy

809 words - 4 pages From what you have read so far, which of the two characters of the creature or Frankenstein is most deserving of sympathy from the reader? The novel, Frankenstein, was written by Shelley and was first published in 1818. It was published at a time of scientific advancement when there were worries about how far science would go as new things were discovered. Shelley explores the theme of the gothic genre and focuses on the evil within and she

Frankenstein Essay

967 words - 4 pages century had fascinated the young scientist Frankenstein. Desiring to challenge morality, he uses his new-found knowledge to fashion a creature out of human body parts who has great strength, but whose appearance is so monstrous that Frankenstein flees his laboratory in terror. The persona of Victor depicts humanities further obsession and greed for knowledge and power as he isolates himself from society. He marvels ‘It was the secrets of heaven and

Frankenstein By Mary Shelley Is 'Frankenstein' Purely A Gothic Horror Story, Or Is It A Precursor Of Modern Science Fiction?

1662 words - 7 pages fiction based and claims scientific discoveries and often deals with convincing technological events, such as, space travel or life on other planets.By taking into account the definitions of the attributes, you can clearly see that one of the criteria for a gothic horror story is the use of light and darkness to create a sinister atmosphere. In chapter 5 during the creation of the monster, Mary Shelly effectively uses light and darkness to create

Frankenstein and Blade Runner

693 words - 3 pages Frankenstein and Blade Runner Humanity’s unrestricted pursuit of scientific knowledge and consequent usurpation of the omnipotent role of God ultimately results in disruptions of the natural order of nature and humanity along with the scrutiny and criticism of mankind’s innate identity. - Tyrell and Frankenstein’s Prometheus-like ambitions to achieve scientific advancements. - Socially criticise humanity’s flawed identity through the

A Deeper Understanding of Aspirations and Defeat Emerges from Considering the Parallels Between Frankenstein and Bladerunner

1578 words - 7 pages on aspirations and defeat. Over-ambitious and obsessive aspirations lead to the defeat of individuals and relationships in society, both with the natural world and with each other. In both texts, as well as aspirations that are shown to be artificial – like that of Tyrell for commercial and monetary gain, and Victor Frankenstein for selfish satisfaction – aspirations are shown to be humane and universal. The defeat of humane and universal

Mary Shelley

1369 words - 6 pages book gets its foundation and structure (Crafts 2). One of the most remarkable characteristics of the book, Frankenstein, is the energy of the creature in relationship to the human beings. The strength that the monster possesses comes from a feeling of browbeaten people. This is the result of them being assaulted by scientific objectification. As a result, he tries very hard to affirm that he is in fact human by rising up even though he is looked

Frankenstein Syndrome

1779 words - 8 pages Frankenstein, because she saw that we can not only rely on science to solve our problems. It's up to us to get educated so as to be capable of making proper decisions about the way science should be used. What can we take from Shelley's novel and of the modern reception of the day is that humanity needs to develop a sense of scientific patience. In our world everyone seems to worry about a quick fix. We want all the good results immediately

frankenrunner

943 words - 4 pages her own story credence by drawing an allegorical legend, authoritative because of its longevity. Thus, due to the context in which Mary Shelley lived, the values of the natural order and romanticism are clearly depicted within the text Frankenstein.  Shelley critiques the contextual enlightenment ideals of scientific rationalism and progress at all costs and instead suggests the value of tradition/nature. Ernest (Frankenstein’s brother) is

Frankenstein and Bladerunner

3043 words - 13 pages . The recalcitrance of Frankenstein is paralleled in Tyrell, but the value of personal moral choice is highlighted in Deckard. Both texts warn against the dangerous assumption that all scientific or technological progress is good, not because there is something inherently dangerous in science itself, but because man is a flawed being, unable to foresee the consequences of his own creative ambitions. In the hands of a being so profoundly

Related Essays

Technology And Morality In Shelley's Frankenstein Victor's Use Of Science

1049 words - 5 pages .  According to Victor Frankenstein, life can come from the appendages of other human beings. With his creation Victor Frankenstein disproves the idea of a celestial creator.           "A new species would bless me as its creator and source; Many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me."  This statement, said by Victor Frankenstein himself, could, in theory, disprove all that

Frankestein Essay

676 words - 3 pages Morality has been questioned by people, honored by people and revered since the dawn of time. Yet till this day not one of us can say what is morally right? It is all up to the person’s opinions. In the book Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, Doctor Frankenstein is faced with a question of morality whether to create another monster. It was morally right for Doctor Frankenstein to not create the second monster. The first monster had already ran away

Text In Time Frankenstein And Blade Runner

888 words - 4 pages The texts in time elective allows us to compare how a treatment of similar content in a pair of texts composed in different contexts may reflect changing values. How has this been revealed though your comparative stuffy of Frankenstein and Blade Runner? By juxtaposing texts, their paradigmatic undercurrents emerge, with timeless scientific and ontological concerns transcending contextual discrepancies. Shelley’s 1818 gothic novel

Blade Runner And Frankenstein Essay

582 words - 3 pages Rhetorical question… Why have we ignored the warnings? Two texts that have presented us with warnings are both Frankenstein and Blade Runner, concerns of their times in both Mary Shelly’s ‘Frankenstein’’ and Ridely scotts blade runner warned us of the consequences of overstepping our boundaries of man kinds moral code and the effect of technology advancement and lack of moral and virtuous conduct that is expected to human kind. These texts