For Better or For Worse: The Issue of Gay Marriage
The legalization of same-sex marriage is a topic that has been argued in our society for several years. It is also a topic that has been opposed by many people not only because it can be hard to accept marriage between gay couples, but it can also be hard to throw away what is considered to be morals, tradition, the natural law of life and the norms of our society. As the population of homosexuals increases, so does the inequality and the discrimination. We have our society to blame for this. Our civil rights and the Constitution give us many liberties. Civil rights including life, ...view middle of the document...
In a marriage there is one thing that truly matters: love. Of course there are other factors such as companionship and financial stability; but not one couple would make it to even asking someone to marry them if there was not some love in the relationship. Las Vegas, Nevada is known for being the place where many weddings occur which are annulled within one week. These marriages are not based off love, but simply a drunken night in Vegas. We allow people to marry out of the spur of the moment, yet we have the audacity to say that it is gay marriage that ruins the institution of marriage. The institution of marriage is not “ruined” by homosexual couples but by people such as Kim Kardashian, Jennifer Lopez, Brittany Spears and many others who take marriage for granted, by marrying the first person that comes around and divorcing them when things are “rough”, all three have been in multiple marriages and at least one marriage that lasted less than six months (Schweitzer).
Same-sex families are increasing each day. Unlike heterosexual couples, homosexual couples cannot procreate as easily as those who are heterosexual couples. Many believe that this is a reason why gay marriage should not be legalized. If the purpose of marriage is solely for procreation as many have said it is, then why is it that we allow those who are infertile and sterile or those choosing not to have children to marry. Better yet, why not we as society ban contraceptives; after all birth control and condoms’ purpose is to avoid pregnancy and it seems that non-procreative sex is the issue .Although homosexuals do not necessarily reproduce they do have children. Some of these children come from previous heterosexual relationships, others from adoption, and some couples choose artificial insemination or surrogate parenting (Persily). Although the children may not be the couple’s child genetically, it is their child in every other way.
Another common argument against same-sex marriage is that it defies most religions such as Christianity, Islam and Orthodox Judaism. It is an understandable statement; after all, we have always been taught that marriage is only to be between a man and a woman and anything otherwise it defies religion. The problem with that argument is that although it may be understandable it is a perfect example of antidisestablishmentarianism, better...