This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Salomon V. Salomon Case Essay

1072 words - 5 pages

Salomon v. Salomon & Co. [1897] A.C. 22 (H.L.)

Salomon v. Salomon & Co. (1896), [1897] A.C. 22 (H.L.) is a foundational decision of the House of Lords in the area of company law. The effect of the Lords' unanimous ruling was to firmly uphold the concept of a corporation as an independent legal entity, as set out in the Companies Act 1862.
| |


Aron Salomon was a successful leather merchant who specialized in manufacturing leather boots. For many years he ran his business as a sole proprietor. By 1892, his sons had become interested in taking part in the business. Salomon decided to incorporate his business as a Limited Liability Company, Salomon & Co. Ltd.

At the time the ...view middle of the document...

The lord justices of appeal variously described the company as a myth and a fiction and said that the incorporation of the business by Mr. Salomon had been a mere scheme to enable him to carry on as before but with limited liability.

The Lords:

The House of Lords unanimously overturned this decision, rejecting the arguments from agency and fraud. They held that there was nothing in the Act about whether the subscribers (i.e. the shareholders) should be independent of the majority shareholder. The company was duly constituted in law and it was not the function of judges to read into the statute limitations they themselves considered expedient. The 1862 Act created limited liability companies as legal persons separate and distinct from the shareholders. Lord Halsbury stated that the statute "enacts nothing as to the extent or degree of interest which may be held by each of the seven [shareholders] or as to the proportion of interest or influence possessed by one or the majority over the others."

Lord Halsbury remarked that - even if he were to accept the proposition that judges were at liberty to insert words to manifest the intention they wished to impute to the Legislature - he was unable to discover what affirmative proposition the Court of Appeal's logic suggested. He considered that identifying such an affirmative proposition represented an "insuperable difficulty" for anyone putting forward the argument propounded by the lord justices of appeal.

Lord Herschell noted the potentially "far reaching" implications of the Court of Appeal's logic and that in recent years many companies had been set up in which one or more of the seven shareholders were "disinterested persons" who did not wield any influence over the management of the company. Anyone dealing with such a company was aware of its nature as such, and could by consulting the register of shareholders become aware of the breakdown of share ownership among the shareholders.

Lord Macnaghten asked what was wrong with Mr. Salomon taking advantage of the provisions set out in the statute, as he was perfectly legitimately entitled to do. It was not...

Other Papers Like Salomon V. Salomon Case

Accounting Essay

1131 words - 5 pages mid 19th century § Limited liability from mid 19th century HI5027 Corporate Law Holmes Institute 2011 9 HI5027 Corporate Law Holmes Institute 2011 10 Important developments for small business Separate legal entity doctrine § Distinction between public and proprietary companies § Salomon s case § Sole director/shareholder companies § The company is a legal person separate from its participants § This means that: Ø its

Legt2741 Assignment

1734 words - 7 pages Smith Stone & Knight Ltd v Birmingham Corp [1939] 4 All ER 116 Walker v Wimborne (1976) 137 CLR 1, 6 (Mason J) -------------------------------------------- [ 2 ]. Case Facts [ 3 ]. Walker v Wimborne (1976) 137 CLR 1, 6 (Mason J). [ 4 ]. Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 [ 5 ]. Hargovan, A. (with Harris, J.) (2010) 32 ‘Corporate Groups: The Intersection between Corporate and Tax Law’ Sydney University Law Review 723 [ 6

Youth Unemployment in India

1834 words - 8 pages trustee or his nominees, for he and they could have given a good title to any third parties who presumably would be quite ignorant of the alleged but concealed trust. On the evidence before us, the company has not even got any admission of this trust by the fourteen nominees of the assessed set out in the schedules to The result is that we have a case which is the exact opposite of Salomon v. Salomon & Co., in the essential facts which I am

Business Law Draft

2400 words - 10 pages team. The corporate veil is “drawn” between the corporate entity and the membership and management of a company so as to separate its independent legal existence from that of its human constituents. In this case Mr Salomon a shoe manufacturer had sold his business to a limited liability company where he and his wife and five children where the shareholders and directors of the company. Mr Salomon owned 20,001from the 20,007 shares of the company

Insolvent Traiding

1784 words - 8 pages using a cash flow test, but must be determined by reference to the facts of each case. A number of factors that a reasonable person would take into account in determining whether a company is insolvent are 14 indicators in insolvency situation: ASIC v Plymin (2003) VSC 123. Dart Limited meets several factors of insolvency: • Continuing losses. Company’s expenses exceeded income by 2.5 million every month since early 2008 • Inability to borrow

Industrial Law

1616 words - 7 pages dispute act prohibits termination or any punishment of an employee on a matter which is pending in an industrial court or arbitration. 09.As the company was an independent institution registered under the companies act is it lawful to have instituted action against the directors without instituting action against the company? In the eyes of law the company is a separate legal entity, but after case's like Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd it was

Ltcm Case Study

2731 words - 11 pages Case Study Outlines Part One: A New Era Founding  Performance P f Trading strategy Mutual Fund & Hedge Fund u ua u d edge u d Part Two: When Genius Failed  Downturn: 1998 Russian Financial Crisis Chain Reaction In the end: Bailout & Characters Part Three: Enemies are ourselves Risk Measurement Diligence, Ethics and Honesty  Dili Ethi dH t Part One: A NEW ERA Founding of LTCM LTCM was founded in 1994 by  John Meriwether, the

Veil Piercing

1554 words - 7 pages company is equal in law to a natural person. This is one of the cornerstones of South African company law, and has been since 1897 handed down in the Salomon case namely that a company is a legal entity distinct from its shareholders. It allows a company to perform juristic acts in its own name, as well as to sue and to be sued. Further, members and directors enjoy protection against personal liability. The corporate veil is a fundamental aspect of a

Neville Brody

571 words - 3 pages Cabaret Voltaire and industrial post-punk band 23 Skidoo in particular. Then in 1981 Brody became art director at the groundbreaking street magazine The Face, working there until 1986, when he moved to men’s style and lifestyle bible, Arena Magazine. In April 1988 the V&A Museum (London) held an exhibition of his work to accompany his first monograph, The Graphic Language of Neville Brody, which became the world’s best selling graphic design book

Business Research Ethics

627 words - 3 pages evidence strongly suggests that corporations are not ignoring cost-benefit evaluations when making decisions on legal compliance,” (DiLorenzo, 2006). At the time of the ethical misconduct, with the analysts recommending bad stocks, Citigroup, Inc. was the parent company of Salomon Smith Barney. “Jack Grubman was a notorious telecommunications analyst for Solomon Smith Barney. He touted his relationships throughout the industry and earned an

Business Law

3883 words - 16 pages and have the power to sue or be sued in its own name. A company is distinct from its director, shareholders, employees and creditors as recognised by the court in the case of Salomon v. A. Salomon Co Pty Ltd [1897] AC 22. The basic principle of corporate law regard an incorporated company as a separate legal entity for the purposes of legal analysis, separated from people who established them, who invest money in it, and who direct and manage its

Related Essays

Law Cases Study Essay

570 words - 3 pages the benefits of limited liability, but to minimize income tax. Q17. - not complete As held in Salomon case, a company is separated legal entity from its owner. Therefore, although the company becomes insolvent, the owner of company is not liable for the debt of company Q18. Salomon case, life veil of incorporate (Frud, avoidance of obligation) - not complete same with past exam As the principle of Salomon case, a company is

Law 200 Essay

3514 words - 15 pages Paul v. Virginia (1869) 10 Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co 10 Adams v Cape Industries plc [1990] 10 Walkovszky v. Carlton 10 Findings 11 Conclusion 11 Bibliography 12   Objective ‘’A company is distinct from its members. Directors are neither agents nor trustees of a company’’ The purpose of this Assignment is to analyze the legendary statement made by Lord Mac Naughton during the Salomon vs Salomon case on corporate personality, in the

Addidas Ag Case Study

1837 words - 8 pages 2007. However, it grew in emerging markets like Asia, Europe and North America. Adidas, TaylorMade and Reebok generated amount of cash for the company and are consider cash cows. V. Conclusion Adidas acquisition of Salomon SA accomplished the goal of putting together the best brand of sport goods in the world in line with the company’s broad differentiation strategy. However, this acquisition wasn’t a good decision. The management failed to

Case Of Saloman Vs. Saloman Co. And Case Of Macaura Vs. Northern Assurance Co

2470 words - 10 pages Introduction: Companies are the dominant form of business association. The fundamental concept of company law was developed based on a case decided more than 100 years ago in the UK’s House of Lords. The case of Salomon established a maxim that a company is a separate legal entity distinct from its members. When a company is formed, it is said to have become “incorporated”. Thus it is a separate legal entity or a legal ‘person’ it has features