This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Respondeat Superior Essay

1023 words - 5 pages

Respondeat Superior
MHA622 Health Care Ethics and Law
November 4, 2013

Respondeat Superior
Employers provide numerous benefits to their employees; however the employers are also ultimately responsible for their employee’s actions while in the workplace. This paper will consider the theories and circumstances surrounding the doctrine of respondeat superior and how the employers are vicariously liable for the actions of their employees. The doctrine will be defined and court cases discussed concerning how the doctrine was applied in each case. The cases will be analyzed concerning how the doctrine was applied and who benefited in each case.
The concept of the employer being held ...view middle of the document...

In this case the jury reached a controversial verdict based on the findings that the doctor himself was not liable, however the doctor’s medical group was liable on a theory of respondeat superior. This was followed by a post trial motion that requested the verdict be set aside due to the fact that there could be no respondeat superior liability without a finding that the medical group’s employee, the doctor, was negligent. The verdict was set aside and later appealed to the Supreme Court of Virginia who has granted certiorari, agreeing to review the findings (McNeill, 2012).
The doctrine of respondeat superior was challenged in this case. By its definition this doctrine is placing the responsibility on the employer for the employee’s actions; however, in this case the employee (defendant’s doctor) was not found negligent. The question was then raised on how the medical group could be found guilty if the doctor was not. The possibility of blame being placed on another employee other than the doctor was speculated due to the unsuccessful attempts to contact the patient was one possibility of the reasoning behind the ruling (McNeill, 2012).
The second case under discussion is the case of Jones v. Baisch (1994). This case involves a case of a young man diagnosed with genital herpes and the breach of confidentiality concerning his medical information. Two employees of the Region West Pediatric Services disclosed the patient’s diagnosis to family members and mutual friends of the patient. The patient upon learning of the breach contacted the doctor and an investigation pursued where the employee’s admitted their wrongdoings. The employees agreed to not make any more disclosures concerning this patient’s condition; however the employees continued discussing the matter. The patient in turn brought suit against the facility and the doctor alleging “(1) invasion of privacy arising out of the disclosure of confidential medical information, and (2) intentional infliction of emotional distress arising out of defendants' failure to settle with Jones. In addition, Jones alleged that defendants were liable on the basis of respondeat superior for breach...

Other Papers Like Respondeat Superior

Mgmt 597 You Decide Week 5

1025 words - 5 pages INC responsible for the restaurant tab for the dinner that John and Coleman had? Is Software INC liable for the injuries John sustained by Coleman? Legal Concepts The doctrine of respondeat superior states that “principals are liable for the negligent conduct of agents acting within the scope of their employment” (Cheeseman 2010 p.475). At the time Coleman blew the fireball that killed Jimmy and severely damaged Jimmy’s bar, he was meeting

Cold Case Trucking Essay

833 words - 4 pages /actual_authority 3. Assume that Crusoe is driving to interview one of CCT’s customers for his study of CCT's logistical operations. While en route, he negligently hits a pedestrian. Is CCT liable for injuries to the pedestrian caused by their agent (Crusoe) under the doctrine of respondeat superior? Explain your analysis. Because Crusoe is classified as an independent contractor, CTT would not be liable for the damages caused by the negligence

Ethics Case Study

1060 words - 5 pages . References Fremgen, B.F. (2009). Medical Law and ethics (3rd. ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary. (2011). Respondeat Superior. Retrieved July 8, 2012 from, The Free (2012) Ethics. Retrieved July 8, 2012 from: U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2010). Diazepam. Retrieved July 8, 2012 from

Proof of Negligence

1334 words - 6 pages procedures guidelines may allow these documents to be admissible as evidence to prove the standard of care, as well. Explain the principle of “vicarious liability” (respondeat superior). A physician or employer may be held liable for the negligent acts of others because the physician or facility has superiority or “say-so” over another person. For example, if a physician’s assistant (PA) is negligent and causes harm to a patient

Assisted Suicide

1354 words - 6 pages care of her child. Also, she would cause her manager and the facility to be liable for any negligence on her part due to the respondeat superior law. The doctrine of respondeat superior is also called the master-servant relationship. “That is, an employer can be liable for the negligence of an employee, who injures someone as a result of their employment, even though the employer did nothing wrong” (Showalter, 2008,p.67). The last legal


1179 words - 5 pages about the cost of his actions, Jerry should find it simple to reject the patient’s appeal. References Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary. (2011). Respondeat Superior. Retrieved from Santa Clara University. (2009). A Framework for Thinking Ethically. Retrieved from U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2010). Diazepam. Retrieved from

Law and Healthcare

2065 words - 9 pages cases he had handled, (c) he had not delivery a baby since more than 20 years ago or performed any surgery and (d) he had pursued no research in or study of obstetrics and gynecology in recent years, (Showalter, J. Stuart, 2008). Other evidence of the standard are: negligence per se, common-knowledge doctrine, res ipsa loquitur and the standard of reasonable prudence. 3. Explain the principle of “vicarious liability” (respondeat superior

Ethics Case Study

852 words - 4 pages . References NCBI National Center for Biotechnology Information. (2011). Retrieved from The Free Dictionary. (2012). Retrieved from References This is a hanging indent. To keep the hanging indent format, simply delete this line of text using the backspace key, and replace the information with your reference entry.

unit 8 project

953 words - 4 pages and job title that I carry. 3. Would Respondeat Superior apply in this case scenario? Why or why not? No, because I acted on my own without doubling checking with my superior. 4. Would the Good Samaritan Law apply in this case scenario? Why or why not? No, because the Good Samaritan Law states that when assisting in an emergency situation, as long as you only do as much as a good and prudent person with your level of training

Ethics Case Study

757 words - 4 pages . References Appleson, G. (1982, June). Valium addiction: Who’s to blame. American Bar Association Journal, 68(6). Fremgen, B. F. (2009). Medical law and ethics (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Nolo's plain english law dictionary. (2013). Retrieved from

Lewis V. D. Hays Trucking, Inc

833 words - 4 pages and respondeat superior (Cheeseman, 2012, p. 511). Hercules made a motion for summary judgment, alleging that D. Hays Trucking, Inc., was and independent contractor and therefore Hercules could not be held liable for its negligence (Cheeseman, 2012, p. 511). According to Cheeseman (2012), the language of the court was as follows: Here, the terms of the Harvesting Contract and Freight Contract between Hays and Hercules clearly denominates Hays

Related Essays

Organizational Ethics Essay

432 words - 2 pages Organizational Ethics Name Subject Instructor Date The doctrine of Respondeat Superior is one that directly translated from Latin means “let the master answer”. This is the doctrine that seeks to have the eventuality of any cases of organizational ethics being answered for by the organizational heads as opposed to the employee show may have performed them. The doctrine underscores the fact that the employer is

Ethics Case Study Hcs/335

1250 words - 5 pages Pharmacy (2010) goes on to say "The record should reflect that it is the physician's decision to allow for renewal of the prescription" (Nurses Authorizing Prescriptions and Signature Requirements, para.2) . This supports the claim that Mr. McCall's medical training does not qualify him to issue the requested prescription refill or any prescription without physician authorization. Medical Malpractice and Respondeat Superior The principles

Netties Flower Garden Essay

873 words - 4 pages make the stops. Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, if an employee commits negligent acts or omissions within the scope of his or her employment, the employer is liable for the damages. Hougland, 939 S.W.2d at 33. Only if a master-servant relationship exists between the parties does the doctrine of respondeat superior act to impose liability on an employer. Id. To determine if respondeat superior applies, it must be determined whether the

Corporate Negligence Essay

931 words - 4 pages care for the patient. Define Respondeat Superior Respondeat Superior is a legal doctrine that holds employers responsible for managing their employees. Whenever there is a situation of harm from the employee to the third party, the employer may be the one to accept liability depending on the nature of the incident, (Pozgar, 2010). An example from a nursing perspective would be for months some nursing personnel at a local hospital have failed