Racial Diversity in Jury Selection
American Intercontinental University
The selection process of juries was designed to select citizens that were equal peers of the person involved in the trial. However, many disparities exist and the selection process at times seems to be disproportionate relating to race or ethnicity. Reform of the legislature would benefit those that are not being properly served.
It is the right of every citizen in this nation to have his or her case decided by a fair and impartial jury. The selection of the jury panel is one of great importance and one that can have a great effect on the outcome of the case. ...view middle of the document...
It was only after Batson v. Kentucky that the court lowered the burden of proof necessary for defendants to successfully make the case that the prosecution’s peremptory use was biased by race (Sommers, 2009).
After researching this subject, it is my opinion that mostly evidence depicted shows that unfortunately there seems to be some kind of bias in every jury selection. Jurors are arbitrarily selected from the electoral register, meaning that anyone that is a registered voted may be summoned to appear for jury duty. Research indicates that there have been substantial variations in the structure of juries since 1972. However, to this day, it seems that there is still to be an inadequate representation of women and ethnic minorities. In review of the criminal courts, Lord Justice Auld determined that notwithstanding the modifications of previous decades, juries still lacked diversity and that the e community and its citizens were not adequately represented. The jury system is responsible for the arbitrary selection of jurors and are not selected based on their gender or ethnicity, however, Justice Auld suggested that in...