Proof Of Negligence Essay

1334 words - 6 pages

Law and Health Care- Proof of Negligence
Vickie Young
Dr. L. Forbes
Strayer University
January 22, 2012

Identify and explain the four elements of proof necessary for a plaintiff to prove a
negligence case.
Negligence is defined as “conduct that falls below the standards of behavior established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm. A person has acted negligently if he or she has departed from the conduct of a reasonably prudent person acting under similar circumstances” (Legal Dictionary,n.a.). This conduct is also referred to as “duty of care” (Showalter, 2008, pg.47, para.1). Though negligence is one of the most common types of lawsuits ...view middle of the document...

60, para.4). The injury doesn’t necessarily have to be solely caused by the negligence, but the plaintiff has to prove that the negligence was a possibly a significant consideration in the resulting injury. The determination of negligence is not black and white. The negligence may be proven to have caused only some part of the injury.
Explain how the standard of care can be proven.
In order to prove there was a breach of duty of care the standard of care must first be established. In medical cases there is usually the need for an expert witness to assist in establishing exactly what the standard of care would entail. This witness must be familiar with the local practice. This means the witness must understand the area and the medical standards there. This is sometimes referred to as a “locality rule” (Showalter, 2008, pg.54, para.3) because physicians in rural areas might not be held to the same standards as physicians practicing at a world renown medical center. This rule is somewhat more relaxed in current cases because the national standards are relatively the same for continuing education and policies and procedures in the health field. Another concern was also finding an expert witness in a particular area who would be willing to testify against a colleague (Showalter, 2008, pg.54, para.3). The witness must also be an expert in the field that is relevant to the case. A neurosurgeon would not be an acceptable expert witness in an obstetrics case. There would be more appropriate witnesses who would better understand the procedures and standards acceptable for obstetrics specialties.
Some states allow medical publications or published policies and procedures to lend credence to evidence the accepted standard of care. Hospital or clinic policies and procedures manuals, written and adopted by the facility, are often accredited by certain governmental agencies (Showalter, 2008, pg.56, para.4). These accredited agencies’ stamp of approval on the policies and procedures guidelines may allow these documents to be admissible as evidence to prove the standard of care, as well.
Explain the principle of “vicarious liability” (respondeat superior).
A physician or employer may be held liable for the negligent acts of others because the physician or facility has superiority or “say-so” over another person. For example, if a physician’s assistant (PA) is negligent and causes harm to a patient, the physician may be held liable for the damages or injury caused, because the physician oversees the PA. The professional person, employer or facility can be liable for the actions of the employees or those who should take direction from the physician or follow the set standards held by the facility’s policies and procedures, as the “respondeat superior” is the lead authority in what acceptable treatment is and what it is not (Showalter, 2008, pg.68, para.1).
Explain why a corporation is considered...

Other Papers Like Proof of Negligence

Lol Lol Lol Lol Essay

1590 words - 7 pages proof on balance of probabilities s15 Contributory negligence – the plaintiff was also negligent - s47 damages can be apportioned but can also be reduced to nils95 - Presumption of contributory negligence—injured person intoxicated (1)     Contributory negligence must be presumed if the injured person was intoxicated at the time of the accident and the defendant claims contributory negligence. (2)     The presumption can be rebutted

Law and Health Care Administration Essay

1336 words - 6 pages , the plaintiff alleged that the surgeon guaranteed to execute plastic surgery on her nose and thus to “enhance her beauty and improve her appearance.” The surgery failed after several operations, and her nose looked worse than before. 3. Analyze the four (4) elements of proof necessary for a plaintiff to prove negligence. According to Showalter (2012), negligence is the most common type of liability case that healthcare organizations face

Assessing and Managing Legal Risks in Business

1349 words - 6 pages requires monitoring of and documenting soil, water, and air quality. A mechanism to monitor on periodic basis and spot checks should be routine. If there is an EPA violation Alumina can show it has been proactive; thus, the violation was accidental. The legal principle of negligence could be levied against Alumina. It meets the first two elements: duty and breach of duty. The elements of causation, proximate cause and damages could also be

Is the Move Away from Contract and Towards Tort in Product Liability Cases Desirable?

1875 words - 8 pages , “that when injuries occur only after long and uncertainty latency periods, proof of liability is difficult and sometimes impossible”. Although strict liability eliminates many problems that contracts created and moreover the rules of negligence, it also produces its own problems. One example is when consumers are too aware of the strict liability rule that they create situations where someone else is paying for injuries they caused on themselves


3153 words - 13 pages According to Webster, the word's origin is Middle English, injury, from Anglo-French, from Medieval Latin tortum, from Latin, neuter of tortus twisted, from past participle of torquēre First Known Use: 1586 The word "torture" shares the same linguistic origin, though its present meaning diverged in a very different direction. [edit] Categories Torts may be categorized in several ways: one such way is to divide them into Negligence

Written Report

1270 words - 6 pages kidnapping (not mentioned in the text) may also be explored. The same actions that created the false imprisonment should also be considered intentional infliction of emotional distress. There may be a very slight grey area as to whether Steel intended to Pimply emotional distress, but his actions where both intentional and reckless and I believe intend can be inferred from the entirety of the facts surrounding the incident. Negligence may be a

Case Study on Negligence

2187 words - 9 pages Case Study on Negligence - Stella v Christine Stella can take an action of Negligence against Christine for her careless conduct regarding the slippery floor as well as the heating urn and steamer. She will be the plaintiff, and Christine, the defendant. Stella bears the burden of proof that Christine owed her a duty of care, but omitted to perform it, which caused her personal injuries and economic loss. The elements, including duty of care

Law and Healthcare

2065 words - 9 pages 1. Identify and explain the four elements of proof necessary for a plaintiff to prove a negligence case. To begin with, when people think of professional liability in healthcare, they usually think of medical practice, a form of negligence. Negligence by definition is known as one of the most common type of malpractice that exists in the healthcare industry. However, in order for a negligence case to be proven, four elements are necessary

Memorandum Unit 6

572 words - 3 pages denied by the New Mexico Employment Security Board on the grounds that she was terminated for “misconduct” and was therefore ineligible for unemployment compensation. Questions Presented: 1. Did Ms. Baker provide proof of Natalie’s appearance having a negatively effect on the business, causing sales and profits to do down? 2. If Natalie’s refusal to remove the tattoo, after instructed to do so by Mr. Baker, constitutes ‘misconduct’ as defined

Kruse V Coos Head Timber Company

1717 words - 7 pages . Mr. Kruse claimed the agreement should not be enforced because he entered into it under circumstances of fraud and misrepresentation. Mr. Kruse also argued that the compensation agreement should not be enforced because he lacked sufficient mental capacity because he was mentally retarded and suffered from posttraumatic psychoneurosis as a result of the accident. Additionally, Mr. Kruse accused his employer of common law negligence and

Business Synopsis

1113 words - 5 pages Synopsis In the interactive simulation in negligence regulatory compliance, Alumina Inc. is an aluminum producing company that operates in eight countries around the world. The company has business interests in automotive components, the manufacturing of packaging materials, bauxite mining, alumina refining, and aluminum smelting. Although Alumina operates in many countries, the United States accounts for nearly 70% of Alumina’s sales figures

Related Essays

Unit 2 Assignment Ls311

762 words - 4 pages the "direct result" of the negligence. Usually a plaintiff’s injury is considered to be the direct result of the defendant's negligence if it follows an unbroken, natural sequence from the defendant's act and no intervening, external force acts to cause the injury.” In a negligence suit, the plaintiff has to provide the courts with proof the defendant did not act as a reasonable person would have acted. The court will instruct the jury as to

Genuine Bona Fide Occupational Job Qualifications

1339 words - 6 pages Noah’s education than Petunia’s retail experience. Age had no bearing on the hiring decision nor did Petunia’s appearance. I support that Chloe and The Sporty One did not commit unlawful discrimination, and the plaintiff has failed to meet the initial burden of proof. PART II If Petunia brings a lawsuit based on negligence against CARDWARE and The Sporty One, will CARDWARE be responsible for Noah’s behavior? This lawsuit will fall under the

You Decide Essay

2398 words - 10 pages Page: 1 2 1. Question : What are the elements of negligence that Mr. Margreiter will need to prove against the hotel in order to win his case? List the five elements here. Student Answer: 1.The duty, this element requires plaintiff to act like an ordinary careful person. 2.Breach of Duty, which comes after establishing standard of care; hotel was negligence, the hotel should have protected its gusts, and it should have monitored the

Outline To Buis 301 Test 2

803 words - 4 pages OVERVIEW OF TORT LAW -tort -tortfeasor -Tortious conduct SOURCE OF LAW -restatement of torts -second restatement CATERGORIES OF TORTS -intentional, negligence, strict liability -intentional tort PG209 INTENTIONAL BUSINESS-RELATED TORTS -defamation -defamation statement -dissemination to a third party -specificity -damages PUBLIC FIGURE STANDARD -malice -reckless disregard for the truth PG 210 PRIVILEGE DEFENSE TO