This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Prioritizing Projects At D. D. Williamson

1316 words - 6 pages

Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson
Dianne M. Dowling
Human Resource Project Management
Strayer University
Dr. Lila Jordan
April 26, 2013

D. D. Williams was founded in 1865 and today is a global leader of non-artificial coloring. They
operate in nine (9) facilities in six (6) countries and supplies many of the best-know food and
beverage companies. Though time has brought about many changes, the organization finally
realized what needed to transpire in order to bring their mission and vision into becoming the
outstanding company they are today. With strategic planning and prioritizing, D. D. Williamson
has learned what it takes to be successful and ...view middle of the document...

They also had problems completing
projects. The vision for the company was not clears and the leadership was of poor quality.
Effective leadership must be established early on in order to see the mission and visions of the
company through. There was no strategic planning as to what the main focus, resources and
priorities were. Initially, leadership was not where it needed to be as seems to be mot a project
life cycle in place.
But then the company took a different approach to change. They began to simplify the
criteria ratings by rating projects at corporate level and added in senior level management
support. As a result, it received higher success rates for larger projects. They decided to have
fewer projects, senior management and others worked together and focused more on the long-
term goals of the company (Mkomo, Nkomo, Fottler & McAfee, 2012).
2. Suggest at least one (1) recommendation to improve the prioritizing process.
There were several things that could have been done to improve the process of
prioritizing at D. D. Williamson. Recommendations to improve the prioritizing process would
be for them to achieve a sense of balance by using portfolios, allowing a balance between the
small and large projects, alternating between high and low risk projects. These projects could be
grouped together to be collectively managed. By using portfolios, this alignment identifies,
selects and prioritizes projects to help achieve an organizational strategic plan (Kloppenborg,
Nkomo, Fottler & McAfee, 2012).
Another recommendation to improve the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson is to
evaluate potential projects through financial analysis and/or scoring. These can be used in
determining which projects are selected. Just by using financial justification for all projects can
bring about improvements. D. D. Williamson could develop an inventory of all projects within
the organization, regardless of their scope or size. This would make it clear as to what projects
have the endorsement of senior management. The company could also make sure each project
has an approved scope statement and detailed project plans. This will affect the project
prioritization decisions simply because projects that fail to have clear scope and detailed plans
are bound for failure.
Last but not least, ranking each project’s priority level can be time consuming but it is
ideal. The more complete the project scope statements, the more accurate the decisions will be
as this helps to identify the missing elements in the foundations for all projects. This process is
an important part of the organizations planning process as it will save time and money as it will
also support the organizations strategic plan (Stanleigh, 2010).
3. Create a scenario where the implemented process at D. D. Williamson would not work.
If D. D. Williamson had not come into the concept of prioritizing, they...

Other Papers Like Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson

Dd Wiliamson Essay

1097 words - 5 pages project implementation to see how accurate the cost/benefit prognostications were. While this lack of after-the-fact analysis avoids blame (and praise) for project participants, it also prevents the organization from gaining valuable information for evaluating, prioritizing, and planning future projects. Create a scenario where the implemented process at D. D. Williamson would not work. According to our text (Kloppenborg, T., Nkomo, S

D.D. Williams Essay

1005 words - 5 pages Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson HRM 517 Managing Human Resource Projects 1/26/2014 Dawn Vousboukis Dr. Castellese | Critique the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson The “Vision Impact Project” (Kloppenborg, Nkomo, Fottler, & McAfee, 2012) took three years to set up and had to be done twice. If this had been done correctly from the beginning, it could have helped prioritize the project for the company. Project charters can and

D.D. Williamson

1246 words - 5 pages Critique the prioritizing process at D.D. Williamson D.D. Williamson’s prioritizing process started off not good but once they realized their mistakes they were able to sit down and rethink their prioritizing process. As mentioned, “We took three years and two iterations of our prioritization process to finally settle on an approach that dramatically increased our success rate on critical projects (now called VIPs, or “Vision Impact Projects

Project Management

3413 words - 14 pages result. a) Program b) Process c) Project d) Portfolio 2. Which of the following is not a potential advantage of using good project management? a) Shorter development times b) Higher worker morale c) Lower cost of capital d) Higher profit margins 3. Which of the following is not an attribute of a project? a) Projects are unique b) Projects are developed using progressive elaboration c) Projects have a primary customer or sponsor d

Managing Business Projects

3048 words - 13 pages ?    A.  | Allocation of resources | B.  | Prioritizing of projects | C.  | Motivation of project contributors | D.  | Adequate planning and control systems | E.  | Quality management | |   19. | Which of the following is NOT a problem associated with the absence of a project portfolio system?    A.  | Organizational politics | B.  | Lack of funding | C.  | Resource conflicts | D.  | Multitasking | E.  | Implementation gap

Term Paper

2487 words - 10 pages Weighted Ranking Since all projects will have different financial indicators including the cost of implementation, expected rate of return etc, evaluating and prioritizing these projects purely based on these numbers might not be simple. To aide this process, we have used a balanced & weighted ranking system to prepare a balanced scorecard by listing all factors and assigning certain weight-age. With each factor listed with weight-age, a grid

Paired Comparison Analysis

1265 words - 6 pages ) The steps given are followed for using this technique: STEP-I List the options you will compare. Assign a letter (A, B, C, D, and so on) to each option. STEP-II Mark the options as rows and columns headings on the work sheet. STEP-III Note that the cells on the table where you will be comparing an option with itself will be blocked out mean there will never be a difference in these cells. STEP-IV The cells on the table where you will be

Company Delamere Pottery Limited

1014 words - 5 pages , "The relationship between ERP system and supply chain management performance in Malaysian manufacturing companies", Journal of Enterprise Information Management, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 576-604. Williamson, D., Jenkins, W, Cooke, P., & Moreton, K. M. (2011) Strategic management and business analysis. 1st edn. 2004. New York: Routledge Zhang, Z., et al., 2005. A framework of ERP systems implementation success in China: an empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 98 no. 1, pp. 56–80.

Personal Responsibility Essay

936 words - 4 pages Personal Responsibility-My College Success Gen 200 August 24, 2012 Kimberlee Moravick-Cheng Personal Responsibility-My College Success 1. Overview 2. Identifying Challenges A. Time B. Family C. Work D. School 3. Learning how to balance A. Prioritizing B. Time management C. Study routine D. Setting goal E

Leadership Lessons from Appollo 13

530 words - 3 pages Apollo 13; Inner Teachings Lusalu Daniel Academic writers Online The Apollo 13 is NASA’s seventh Apollo space mission taking human beings into the outer space. The launch of the Apollo 13 space craft took place at the Kennedy Space center on 11th April 1970. On the second day of the mission the service Module was crippled by an explosion of the second oxygen tank. As a result the mission was

Project Management

4253 words - 18 pages end, and drop rapidly as the project nears an end. D) all of the above. 32) Projects are divided into smaller parts called: 32) ______ A) stages. B) phases. C) deliverables. D) parts. 33) The review points at the end of each stage are called everything EXCEPT: 33) ______ A) kill points. B) stage gates. C) phase exits. D) terminators. 34) The five phases of the systems development life cycle include all EXCEPT: 34) ______ A) bug

Related Essays

Case Study 1: Prioritizing Projects At D.D. Williamson

1214 words - 5 pages Case Study 1: Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson HRM 517 – Managing Human Resource projects Strayer University June 21, 2013 What was the Prioritization Issue at D.D. Williamson? In the case study of D.D. Williamson, it appeared the organization was successful in many ventures, but lacked the ability to manage certain projects. In fact, critical projects that required attention were left to the waste side, and as

Prioritizing At Dd Williamson Essay

1022 words - 5 pages complete the project that is being implemented and cause the company to over budget themselves on certain projects again. Five years from now, the writer speculates that D. D. Williamson will still be using the same prioritizing process that is being used to today until technology takes an indefinitely change. However, it has taken D. D. Williamson years to begin a prioritizing process for its organization. At a point in time, D.D

Acer Group’s R&D Strategy – The China Decision Strategic Outsourcing At Bharti Airtel Limited

731 words - 3 pages Acer Group’s R&D Strategy – The China decision Strategic Outsourcing at Bharti Airtel Limited “The concept of absolute cost advantage leads us to believe that successful firms ultimately locate in the lowest cost environment (or country) for their business. Compare the Acer and Bharti Airtel cases (and relevant materials) to either agree or disagree with this view.” I disagree with this statement as we can see in both cases for Acer

Human Resource Essay

763 words - 4 pages Critique the prioritizing process at D.D. Williamson D.D. Williamson was founded in 1865 and has grown into a multi-billion dollar global organization. It has nine natural coloring operations in five continents. With that being said this means that nothing but quality and execution is expected out of D.D. Williamson. According to Case Study 2 “Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson”, D.D. Williamson uses Outlook to database to keep track of