My Personal Leadership Style: Participative
A Participative Leadership style requires the leader to include all members of the team to participate in any decision making processes. This is a very common style among new leaders and it is quickly becoming the preferred leadership style with many companies. A participative leadership style can further be broken into three subcategories: democratic, consultative, and consensus.
This type of participative leadership style is used best in environments where there is never a set constant and things are rapidly changing. Because these types of business are constantly evolving, all options or considerations for ...view middle of the document...
This type of decision making process usually requires the company to buy in or agree with the decision before it is implemented, consequently, this can lead to a very long decision making period.
Leadership Style Comparisons, Strengths, and Weaknesses
| Participative | Laissez-Faire | Situational |
Similarities | Relies heavily on the opinions and thoughts of the team members, especially those that will be the most impacted by whatever change may be implemented. | Leaves most of the responsibility to the team members. Usually allows the team members to decide what course of action is best for the team as a whole. | Depends on the feedback of team members to determine the correct course of action. The leader must be able to determine based on past performance if the same approach will work with different challenges. |
Differences | All team members are allowed the chance to voice their opinion and each opinion is considered before an ultimate decision is made. Best used when decisions do not have to be made quickly. | Best used with group of experienced professionals that are self motivated. Requires a lot of trust from the members to get their work done with minimal input from the leader. | Usually required when there are ongoing processes that constantly require some type of improvement or refinement in some sort of way. Requires the leader to be able to make decisions based off of the teams strengths and weaknesses. |
Table 1: Comparing Leadership Styles
Advantages between the Leadership Styles
The first thing that I notice about the styles is that they are all centered around trust. The leaders know and trust their team. Participative styles trust their members to come up with meaningful insights and ideas. Lasissez-Faire styles trust their members to get the job done without them having to watch them too closely. Situational Leaders trust that since their team has proven their ability to succeed before, and they know their strengths and weaknesses, they can cater their processes to cater to their strengths in the most effective way.
The second advantage is the participation of the team members in the decision process. Although they my not have a verbal say in how decisions are made, they are observed enough where they are taken into account before a decision is made.
The third advantage lies in the leader. The team leader in each of these styles must have an inherent strength that allows them to believe in themselves as the ultimate decision maker. Sometimes this they know when to use their influence to sway decisions while still making the input of the team seem valuable.
How to Capitalize their Strength
Their collective strength lies in their trust in their team. Whenever team members feel involved they are often more engaged and eager to share ideas and feel involved in every step of every plan from beginning to end. This is turn leads to higher...