This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Opposition Was The Main Problem Facing Alexander3. How Far Do You Agree With The Statement?

1343 words - 6 pages

Alexander3 inherited the Russian Empire in the moment when there was urge for changes. His legacy from his father was the inception of newly introduced liberal movements. Even though Alexander was reactionary, it was mainly because he did not want to follow his fathers footsteps who was assassinated by nihilist group “Peoples Will”, he couldn’t stop spread of so called “Westerners” and radicals. It was crucial for Alexander to preserve his power as an autocrat, which meant that there were no room for opposition that could jeopardise his reign. But at that point he could still hold his control over Russia and opposition was too weak and divided to challenge the Tsar, at that time Empire ...view middle of the document...

Any opposition and other political views were direct threat to the Church officials, which made them to support Tsars repressions. As well as majority of Aristocracy shared Tsars policies because they existed only due to the existing monarchy, that’s why they supported Tsars fear and hatred of opposition and believed that it was the main problem of Russia.
Westerners wanted to reform autocracy , giving the elective parliament to share political power with the Tsar. Russia was on its way to modernise passing the stage of industrialisation, which meant that it would stand on the same position as Austo-Hungary and Germany. The emancipation of the serfs and creation of zemstvas gave a hope that Russia is modernising. Also educational reforms made a new class called “intelligencia” who shared western liberal views. As well as there were extremist groups that felt the only way for Russia to change was eradication of the monarch, they did not have clear aim what to do after. Alexander understood that and he launched strong repressions to preserve stability of monarchy, he believed that they were main threat and problem of Russia. Together with Pobedonoscev he produced Manifesto that declared Tsars absolute rule.
The other problem that faced Tsar was extremist “Peoples will”, so the way that Alexander replied to that is creating with the government Stature of State Security. There were special government courts to deal with the political rivals. Their power gave them a possibility to arrest the political enemies without a trial and execute them or exile them to Siberia. Thousands were repressed and mainly they did maintain political stability and destroyed “Peoples Will”. Even though the aim was achieved and the main threat facing the Tsar did not exist anymore, they stayed until the end of monarchy in 1917.
Tsar felt that there was the rapid spread of radical and liberal movements and it created another problem for him in his view. So he took the control of the press, its freedom was restricted. Fourteen major newspapers were banned from 1882-9 for displaying liberal ideas. Okhrana the secret police that Tsar created to do the practical job in preserving the stability also censored all foreign material that Russia imported. They made sure that such political ideologies as democracy and parliamentary government did not reach citizens mind.
Even though Alexander thought that he destroyed extremist “Peoples Will” there was a strong underground movement existing still. They made attempts on assassinating the Tsar again. It was another challenge from opposition which Tsar took care of by having them arrested and executed by Okhrana.
Pobedonoscev also saw that zemstvas could be a threat to autocracy. So they took control of that elected body by having Land Captains who were appointed by the Interior Minister himself. They made sure that the local laws did not create another problem that Alexander needed to face. Doctors and teachers could not run...

Other Papers Like Opposition Was the Main Problem Facing Alexander3. How Far Do You Agree with the Statement?

‘Investment and Support from Foreign Powers Was the Main Reason the Weimar Republic Survived in the 1920s.’ How Far Do You Agree?

752 words - 4 pages ‘Investment and support from foreign powers was the main reason the Weimar Republic survived in the 1920s.’ How far do you agree? During the 1920s, there were many ups and downs for Weimar Germany and to start with they struggled and bounced between governments, especially with hyperinflation in 1923. But with the help of foreign support, Weimar was able to make it to the 1930s. It could be said that the Locarno Pact contributed greatly to the

How Far Do You Agree That Lenin’s Leadership Was the Main Reason for Why the Bolsheviks Were Able to Seize Power in 1917

1350 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that Lenin’s leadership was the main reason for why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917. Lenin was a very significant figure during the Russian revolution, under his strong leadership and the advice of some of his advisors, Lenin helped the Bolsheviks come to power. However I would not agree that his leadership was the main reason to why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power as factors such as the weakness

Do You Agree with the View That the Main Reasons for Henry's Failure to Obtain the Annulment of His Marriage in the Years 1525-29 Was the Determined Opposition of Katherine of Aragon?

1071 words - 5 pages Do you agree with the view that the main reasons for Henry's failure to obtain the annulment of his marriage in the years 1525-29 was the determined opposition of Katherine of Aragon? Within the years of 1525-29 Henry failed to obtain an annulment of his marriage, it was suggested that the main reason for this failure was because of the determined opposition of Katherine of Aragon however it is also argued that other factors such as the pope

Do You Agree with the View That the Main Reason for Henry’s Failure to Obtain the Annulemnt of His Marriage in the Years 1525-29 Was the Deremined Opposition of Katherine of Aragon?

930 words - 4 pages . This essentially proved Henry’s claim wrong, weakening his case. However, despite the opposition based on biblical teachings, this was not a large concern as Source 2 and 3 highlight, Wolsey claims “if the pope were free, I have no doubt that he would easily be persuaded to do what you want.” Which contrasts directly with the suggestion that the failure of annulment was down to Catherine’s opposition and simultaneously the claims in Source 4

"Money Is the Root of All Evil." How Far Do You Agree with This?

563 words - 3 pages a balanced and intelligent life; it can be to his dependents, if he conscientiously provides them with a good home, a proper education, and a fair share of this world's goods. It can be to the world at large, if he had enough of it to give some away to benefit the community of which he is a member. So the love of money accounts for much, perhaps most, though not all evil, yet to take the topic-statement at its face value nonsense. Throughout

.How Far Do You Agree with the View That the Development of the Cold War in the Period 1945-50 Was the Result of Stalin’s Foreign Policy?

3210 words - 13 pages .How far do you agree with the view that the development of the Cold War in the period 1945-50 was the result of Stalin’s foreign policy? Development of the Cold War, in the five years between 1945 and 1950, could be argued as taking place for a number of reasons and due to various individuals. It could be easy to simply site Stalin as the main reason responsible for it’s outbreak and growth, clear through his approach on communist expansion

How Far Do You Agree with the View That the Development of the Cold War in the Period 1945-50 Was the Result of Stalin’s Foreign Policy?

3182 words - 13 pages Germany and Berlin were split into Western and Eastern zones; recognised that this could not be a long term solution, the West wanted to rebuild Germany and create a stable democracy and economy – Stalin on the other hand was more concerned with making Germany pay to the full extent. Source S, an extract of Geoffrey Roberts’ ‘Stalin Wars’, reinforces the fact that Stalin’s view and inability to agree with the West over the German question, “was

The Main Threat to Weimar Stability Between 1919-23 Came from the Right. How Far Do You Agree?

868 words - 4 pages The Main threat to Weimar stability between 1919-23 came from the right. How far do you agree? The right WERE a serious problem to stability for the Weimar between 1919-23. But so were the far left, some aspects of the new constitution and the country was also threatened by economic challenges that threatened to overwhelm her. Some of this was due to Versailles but some was due to overspending accrued in the build up to WWI. There can be

“The Rising Tension Between East And West Between 1945-1949 Was Due To Stalin’S Hold Over Eastern Europe” How Far Do You Agree With This View?

1376 words - 6 pages “The rising tension between east and west between 1945-1949 was due to Stalin’s hold over eastern Europe” How far do you agree with this view? (25 marks) Following the Second World War the post war world was left fragile, disrupted and heavily damaged and it was vital that the future of the East and West were determined quickly and correctly as to avoid a rise in underlying tension. Due to the common enemy of Nazism having been removed, the

‘German Aggression Was Responsible for the Outbreak of a General European War in August 1914.’ How Far Do You Agree with This Judgement?

1246 words - 5 pages in question both support and contest the set statement, to an extent. Sources 1 and 3 by Corrigan and Joll, respectively, argue how Germany’s use of tactics agitated European powers, thus causing war. However, Source 2 by Turner disagrees with the statement, arguing how other European powers were to blame for the outbreak of general war. Nevertheless, all sources will be taken into account and analysed with the support of other relevant in the

How Far Do You Agree That the Economy of Tsarist Russia Was Transformed in the Years Up to 1914?

1089 words - 5 pages How far do you agree that the economy of Tsarist Russia was transformed in the years up to 1914? During Alexander III reign, the Country of Russia and its economy was in a very backward state. We saw the Country suffer with extremely low industrialisation, as many of their workforce focused on agriculture. They struggled to sell enough grain at export, in order to fund large scale industrialisation as the serfs were forced by lack of freedom to

Related Essays

“Singapore’s Separation From The Federation Was Inevitable.” How Far Do You Agree With This Statement? Discuss

522 words - 3 pages Question) “Singapore’s separation from the federation was inevitable.” How far do you agree with this statement? Discuss. I agree with this statement to a large extent as during the two years when Singapore was part of Malaysia as there was an irreconcilable political difference between PAP and UMNO. Malaysia also thought of Singapore as an economical rival. The only thing that kept the two parties together

How Far Do You Agree With The View That America Was A Land Of Opportunity During The 1920s?"

1732 words - 7 pages "How far do you agree with the view that America was a land of opportunity during the 1920s?" Explain your answer using sources 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and your own knowledge. (40 marks) The 1920s are widely known as the 'Boom Era', or the 'Roaring Twenties' and a "decade of lively economic growth" (Source 3), due to the sheer economic success and advancement, and the emergence of the motor car, Hollywood, consumerism and

How Far Do You Agree That The Impact Of The Second World War Was The Main Reason Why The Position Of African Americans Improved In The Years 1945

1461 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that the impact of the Second World War was the main reason why the position of African Americans improved in the years 1945–55? The impact of the Second World War was, without a doubt, crucial in improving the lives of black Americans over the years 1945-55, as it led to federal support of the cause. However, it wasn’t as important as the use of direct action which, for the first time, was able to convert de jure into de

How Far Do You Agree That The Limited Appeal Of Mazzini's Ideas Was The Main Reason For The Slow Progress Of National Unity In The Years 1815 48?

1530 words - 7 pages the emerging middle class. Consequently, Mazzini was not able to gain support from people that possessed official power, with Charles Albert going so far as to execute twelve of the sixty seven arrested members of Young Italy after an attempted coup in Piedmont in 1833. Instead, he aimed his policies at the working class peasants, who made up 80% of the population in Italy, and over 90% in poorer states such as Naples. By inspiring them to revolt