‘Nuclear Power Is The Only Answer To Global Energy Needs.’ How Far Do You Agree?

708 words - 3 pages

‘Nuclear power is the only answer to global energy needs.’ How far do you agree?

The philosophy of today’s centaury becomes the common sense for the next. Going through the development and civilization humans have made themselves dependent of own discoveries in an attempt to make their life advanced, easier and efficient. Aftermath industrial revolution ,humans can not sustain without energy ,there is an easy and thoughtless reliance on imported oil and 80% of demand for energy is fulfilled by non-renewable energy .These are in verse of extinct as all these resources are in limited Quantity. The sources humans are using today are all fossil fuels formed through decomposition of biomass from millions of years ago. They are to end soon . Nowadays researchers are more into seeking up another source to replace our dependence in fossil fuels. Nuclear power stands as one option.
Nuclear energy is energy in the nucleus of an atom. Atoms are tiny particles that ...view middle of the document...

Nuclear energy can be produced in large quantity with very less amount of uranium. Comparing with the problem of pollution and waste management created by use of these fossil fuels, nuclear energy is much cleaner and waste is so less that one can even stores all the waste in one year from nuclear power plant under a desk.
However Nuclear power is not the only way to face global energy needs. As an alternative to present sources of energy various other forms of energy can also be used. Solar energy, hydro power and wind energy are some of most abundant forms of energy. These energy can be generated in much cleaner form and while using it; gives no such pollutants. Furthermore solar energy is in free form and the only thing all need to invest in is to transfer them to other reliable form of energy that one can perform his task.
Generating nuclear power needs huge manpower n technology which is not a cheaper means at all. It is very risky job as well. But it is still more abundant form than solar n other sources which is no more than pipe dream for today. Since nuclear power can be supplied in cheaper rates once its production moves from experimental to commercial purpose. We can have benefit from economies of scale. If all act decisively to improve then we can have energy from nuclear power in most safe, cost effective and most efficient form for energy.

We can also be using solar but we will soon be in desperate need for energy, The energy from slow and long process of generating energy will still not be able to able to fulfill huge demand by humans. To supply energy to global level we need some better ways and it can be done from nuclear power plant. World cannot be waiting another million years for formation of more fusel fuels and we cannot sustain till this pipedream of getting energy from solar power turns into reality. Today all have the hope with nuclear energy and as risk is in everything we do, one should be careful while dealing with it and world will no more have to fear for energy crisis.

Hence, Nuclear power plant is one good solution for global energy problem but it is not the only option. If nuclear power was the only answer
Scientist today would not be working for solar and other forms of energy. Nuclear power remains only answer when there is no probability for any other sources.

Other Papers Like ‘Nuclear Power Is the Only Answer to Global Energy Needs.’ How Far Do You Agree?

How Far Do You Agree That the Economy of Tsarist Russia Was Transformed in the Years Up to 1914?

1089 words - 5 pages How far do you agree that the economy of Tsarist Russia was transformed in the years up to 1914? During Alexander III reign, the Country of Russia and its economy was in a very backward state. We saw the Country suffer with extremely low industrialisation, as many of their workforce focused on agriculture. They struggled to sell enough grain at export, in order to fund large scale industrialisation as the serfs were forced by lack of freedom to

‘The Weimar Government completely Recovered in the period of 1924-1928’. How far do you agree?

572 words - 3 pages ‘The Weimar Government completely Recovered in the period of 1924-1928’. How far do you agree? After thorough research in this topic I am swayed more into agreeing that the Weimar Government did recover. This is because of multiple strong reasons that indicate they recovered. The Weimar was able to stabilise the economy using the Stressman’s Rentmark and taking loans from the USA. With a stable economy this shows that the Weimar

Opposition Was the Main Problem Facing Alexander3. How Far Do You Agree with the Statement?

1343 words - 6 pages remarkable by his conservative views, being part of Slavophiles movement. It was easy for him to influence Alexanders views far before he became Tsar and even after his influence kept pursuing the young Tsar. Because of Pobedonoscevs doctrines Alexander believed in order for Russia to modernise it needs to follow old traditions, so he will be safe from repeating his fathers fate. Pobedonoscev taught Alexander that basis of political stability

“Singapore’s Separation from the Federation Was Inevitable.” How Far Do You Agree with This Statement? Discuss

522 words - 3 pages Question) “Singapore’s separation from the federation was inevitable.” How far do you agree with this statement? Discuss. I agree with this statement to a large extent as during the two years when Singapore was part of Malaysia as there was an irreconcilable political difference between PAP and UMNO. Malaysia also thought of Singapore as an economical rival. The only thing that kept the two parties together

How Far Do You Agree Stalins Five Year Plans (1929-1941) Improved the Russian Economy?

1254 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that Stalin’s five year plans (1929-1941) improved the Russian economy? I strongly agree with the view that Stalin’s five year plans improved the Russian economy because of the significant growth in the Russian economy between this times in which the economy was growing at 14% a year. Stalin’s 5 year plans did improve the economy due to heavy industry increased the production of steel. Iron and coal, also by the end of the

The Main Threat to the Stability of the Weimar Republic from 1919 – 1923 Came from the Political Violence of the Extreme Right” How Far Do You Agree?

906 words - 4 pages “The main threat to the stability of the Weimar Republic from 1919 – 1923 came from the political violence of the extreme right” How far do you agree? Many have argued that the political violence of the extreme right was the main threat to the stability of the Weimar. However, despite elements of this argument being true; one could suggest that there are other factors that contributed to the end of the Republic, such as the constitution

How Far Do You Agree That a Study of Russia in the Period from 1855 to 1956 Suggests That Change Was Always Imposed from Above?

1048 words - 5 pages How far do you agree that a study of Russia in the period from 1855 to 1956 suggests that change was always imposed from above? Throughout the period 1855-1956, it’s clear that with both the Tsars and the Bolsheviks, change was, often implemented from both the leaders and the people, However, under both Tsars and the Bolsheviks, they were ruthlessly prevented from striking, having trade unions or really having any control over the future

“The Rising Tension Between East And West Between 1945-1949 Was Due To Stalin’S Hold Over Eastern Europe” How Far Do You Agree With This View?

1376 words - 6 pages “The rising tension between east and west between 1945-1949 was due to Stalin’s hold over eastern Europe” How far do you agree with this view? (25 marks) Following the Second World War the post war world was left fragile, disrupted and heavily damaged and it was vital that the future of the East and West were determined quickly and correctly as to avoid a rise in underlying tension. Due to the common enemy of Nazism having been removed, the

Karl Liebknecht Described the Reichstag as a “Fig Leaf Covering the Nakedness of Absolutism” How Far Do You Agree?

1197 words - 5 pages Karl Liebknecht described the Reichstag as a “fig leaf covering the nakedness of absolutism” how far do you agree? I agree to a great extent that the Reichstag was indeed a jejune body with the Kaiser maintaining a dominating Diktat over all aspects of governance, from dissolving the Reichstag and vetoing legislation to personal control of the Army; the constitution, itself undemocratic, afforded Wilhelm the power he so loved and shared with

How far do you agree with the view that America was a land of opportunity during the 1920s?"

1732 words - 7 pages "How far do you agree with the view that America was a land of opportunity during the 1920s?" Explain your answer using sources 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and your own knowledge. (40 marks) The 1920s are widely known as the 'Boom Era', or the 'Roaring Twenties' and a "decade of lively economic growth" (Source 3), due to the sheer economic success and advancement, and the emergence of the motor car, Hollywood, consumerism and

The Leadership of Henry V Was Responsible for English Success in France 1415-1420, How Far Do You Agree?

825 words - 4 pages The leadership of Henry v was responsible for English success in France 1415-1420, How far do you agree? The leadership of Henry V was partially responsible for the English success in France during 1415-1420, however it can be argued that luck is a far greater factor to the English’s success, as luck was essential in several battles such as the mud in Agincourt and the fact that the Burgundian and Armagnac division was tearing France apart did

Related Essays

"Money Is The Root Of All Evil." How Far Do You Agree With This?

563 words - 3 pages regards money as an end in itself, to be increased and amassed for its own sake, he is liable to become selfish and miserly, unconcerned about other people or their needs. If he sees money as a means of buying physical pleasures for himself, he is in danger of becoming a corrupt, indeed a criminal. If, on the other hand, he earns money, but spends it wisely, he can do nothing but good, this good may be to himself, if he spends his money to secure

How Far Do You Agree That Lenin’s Leadership Was The Main Reason For Why The Bolsheviks Were Able To Seize Power In 1917

1350 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that Lenin’s leadership was the main reason for why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917. Lenin was a very significant figure during the Russian revolution, under his strong leadership and the advice of some of his advisors, Lenin helped the Bolsheviks come to power. However I would not agree that his leadership was the main reason to why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power as factors such as the weakness

How Far Do You Agree That The Most Important Reason For Wolsey’s Fall From Power Was His Failure To Gain A Divorce For Henry Viii?

957 words - 4 pages The most important reason for Wolsey’s fall from power was his failure to gain a divorce for Henry VIII, how far do you agree? Wolsey’s dismissal from Henry’s court came in September 1529, though Wolsey had a plethora of failures before, his fall his failure to get a divorce for Henry VIII proved to be the most significant. This is because Wolsey’s strength of position depended on whether he got Henry what he wanted and the divorce was the

The Main Threat To Weimar Stability Between 1919 23 Came From The Right. How Far Do You Agree?

868 words - 4 pages The Main threat to Weimar stability between 1919-23 came from the right. How far do you agree? The right WERE a serious problem to stability for the Weimar between 1919-23. But so were the far left, some aspects of the new constitution and the country was also threatened by economic challenges that threatened to overwhelm her. Some of this was due to Versailles but some was due to overspending accrued in the build up to WWI. There can be