Electronic Surveillance of Employees
Assignment # 1
Law Ethics and Corporate Governance
Professor Michael Green
April 23, 2011
Electronic Surveillance of Employees
Explain where an employee can reasonably expect to have privacy in the workplace.
The issue of privacy is a big concern in the workplace. With the expanding of new technology, many employees are concerned that their privacy rights are not being protected. Employers want to be sure their employees are doing a good job, but employees don't want their every sneeze or trip to the water cooler logged. That's the essential conflict of workplace monitoring. New technologies make it possible ...view middle of the document...
The second place where an employee can reasonably expect to have privacy is in the computer mainframe where all the pertinent records (such as social security number, address, date of birth, banking information, etc.) are stored (Harlow, 1999). This is used primarily for an employee’s timekeeper administration and government reporting purposes. Only key personnel such as Human Resources, Accounting and IT have access. There are also different levels of access allowed based on the need to see the data. Another area of where an employee can reasonably expect to have privacy from their co-workers is in their private workspace areas. This allocated space is where an employee places their personnel belongings in a drawer, cupboards or lockers.
Does it make a difference if an employee is in an open or closed workstation
Does it make a difference if an employee is in an open workstation or closed workstation? Yes it makes a difference on the type of workstation you have. A lot of companies are blasting cubicle and office walls space into open-plan workspaces in a bid to increase communication and collaboration. While open-plan workspaces certainly lead to more conversation but that doesn’t mean that it will lead to greater productivity overall. Increase the level of communication within the team”, then I am quite certain that the open floor plan will do that (Harlow 1999). The problem is that productivity will probably decrease and the communication will probably be a lot more non-work related chat. People overhearing other conversations and chiming in, people trying to concentrate, having their concentration broken, and then at some point, getting frustrated and just getting up to walk it off. Maybe dropping in to another persons cube, interrupting them and then having a conversation about something that’s not related to productivity. But this doesn’t mean that enclosed working offices are any better. It depends on the employee and how well they work either way. It would be great is more employers offered both options. When you think about it, companies prefer the open space plan because it really provides another benefit for them…checks and balances. You can tell pretty quickly who’s in the office, who’s working etc. It makes it a lot easier for the company to keep up with everyone and make sure every is working and fulfilling all the goals of the company.
Herman’s need to know whether his salespersons are honest is a sufficient ground for utilizing electronic surveillance
Honesty is not a sufficient ground for utilizing electronic surveillance with out the employees and customer’s consent. There are different methods to use other than surveillance to determine the employees honesty to the customer. Herman could of use surveys of customers to find out this information. In fact, many businesses use customer surveys rather than electronic surveillance to evaluate the honesty of their...