Law Negligence Essay

672 words - 3 pages

Chapter 6 – Negligence
Case 1

Submitted to: Chantelle Troy
Submitted by: Elaine Crocker, Justine Byrne and Brandon Noelle
March 12th, 2014

The plaintiff, Dean Zastowny, had been incarcerated after committing a number of crimes to support his drug habit. While imprisoned he was sexually assaulted by a prison officer. Zastowny then developed personality disorders such as low self-esteem, anti-social behaviour, and sexual anxiety. After being released the conditions remained and Zastowny found ease in the use of heroin; he continued to lead a life of crime. After spending 12 years in prison Zastowny had decided to sue the prison guard and the province. The defendants (prison guard and the province) admitted liability. The trial judge states that if the sexual assault did not occur Zastowny would not have become addicted to heroin, and he would not have committed additional crimes leading to his return to prison. The judge also states that because of the ...view middle of the document...

The defendants, the prison guard and the province are being accused of sexual assault and have accepted liability. The prison guard committed the tort of negligence and is liable because the guard owed a duty of care, breached the standard of care and caused harm to the plaintiff. When compensating the plaintiff, the prison guard may pay or the province may.
The tort of negligence and the intentional tort of sexual assault are observed in Zastowny’s case. The tort of negligence determines whether the defendant can be held liable for carelessly causing injury to the plaintiff. The tort of negligence requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant owed a duty of care, in that they were required to act carefully toward the plaintiff, breached the standard of care by acting carelessly, and caused harm to the plaintiff. An intentional tort is a deliberate act intended to injure others, or to interfere with another person’s rights. Sexual assault is committed when someone knowingly causes another person to engage in an unwanted sexual act by force or threat.
I believe the judge should not award damages to Zastowny for all of the losses. Zastowny has a past of frequent drug use and was imprisoned for criminal acts that he had done before he was sexually assaulted. While being imprisoned from his own actions he was sexually assaulted. If he had not been imprisoned perhaps he might not have been in the situation. However, it is not Zastowny’s fault that he was sexually assaulted, but the matter may have been prevented if he did not commit previous crimes. I believe Zastowny should be compensated for the sexual assault because he suffered and is still suffering from low self-esteem, anti-social behaviour and sexual anxiety. Zastowny should not be compensated for the amount of time he spent in prison for crime that he has committed because he has a past of drug use and he could have received help after the incident happened.
If the case were to go to court, the judge would most likely be in the plaintiffs favor because it is the workers responsibility as well as the institutions to make sure all inmates are safe. Also, criminals have rights that remain the same as any other person and should not be disregarded because of criminal actions.

Other Papers Like Law - Negligence

Tort Law Homework Essay

1878 words - 8 pages NEGLIGENCE Tort Law is a field that encompasses material of considerable breadth and diversity and whose existence, as a reflected in individual actions seeking civil redress for injuries nor arising out of contractual relations can be traced can be traced back to primitive societies. (White, 2003 p.23) A ‘tort’ is a Norman word for a ‘wrong’ but ‘torts’ have typically been distinguished from crimes and from ‘wrongs’ identified with

The Irac Method of Case Study Analysis

787 words - 4 pages The IRAC Method of Case Study Analysis LAW/531 April 27, 2014 The IRAC Method of Case Study Analysis Facts In the case of Martha Bull, 76, against Greenbrier Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, negligence was found in her death. Ms. Bull was admitted to the center for rehabilitation after a stroke. On the night of April 7, 2008 there was an order to have her sent to the emergency room; however, there was oversight and the order was

Assumption of Risk

802 words - 4 pages negligence caused the plaintiff’s injuries.The sports injury doctrine, relating to 12 V.S.A. § 1037 “which established that there are inherent dangers to be accepted by skiers as a matter of law.” The motion for a new trial was denied and “ found that the sports injury statute applied to participants in any sport,” not just the operators. “While skiers fall, as a matter of common knowledge, that does not make every fall a danger inherent to

Negligence in Certified Nursing Assistant

1217 words - 5 pages . Safe patient care is a RIGHT. (Hoffman, 2008) Therefore, proper cares for patients are very important in any health organization. Nursing Assistant has a big role to be mandated reporters, assurance of daily care and educated within their scope of practices. Negligence can be avoided through education and reminder to health professionals about Medical Law and Ethics. References Berman, Audrey, Shirlee Snyder, Barbara Kozier and Glenora

Organizational Ethics

432 words - 2 pages responsible for the employee and the job that he does as long as he is in the employment of that employer. It is essential to note that the law does not apply to the actions of another position or contracts in relations to the employer. For instance, an independent contractor’s actions would not be put on the employer. According to Regan and Regan (2002), the first and most applicable situation of this law in the medical practice is negligence. These

Genuine Bona Fide Occupational Job Qualifications

1339 words - 6 pages Unintentional Torts (Negligence) and under the legal doctrine Respondeat Superior. The rational of this doctrine is based on the Latin maxim “qui facit per alium facit per se” which means that he who does an act through another does it by himself. This maxim is the origin of the principle of vicarious liability which says that the master or principal is responsible for his servant’s or agent’s act. (Qui Facit Per Alium Facit Per Se Law & Legal

Proof of Negligence

1334 words - 6 pages Law and Health Care- Proof of Negligence Vickie Young Dr. L. Forbes Strayer University January 22, 2012 Identify and explain the four elements of proof necessary for a plaintiff to prove a negligence case. Negligence is defined as “conduct that falls below the standards of behavior established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm. A person has acted negligently if he or she has departed from the

You Decide

2398 words - 10 pages Page: 1 2 1. Question : What are the elements of negligence that Mr. Margreiter will need to prove against the hotel in order to win his case? List the five elements here. Student Answer: 1.The duty, this element requires plaintiff to act like an ordinary careful person. 2.Breach of Duty, which comes after establishing standard of care; hotel was negligence, the hotel should have protected its gusts, and it should have monitored the

Is the Move Away from Contract and Towards Tort in Product Liability Cases Desirable?

1875 words - 8 pages shift from contracts to tort. We will also discuss how tort law has developed over time focusing on the negligence rule and strict liability. Product liability law has become a very effective tool for consumer protection. However an injured consumer would still have to prove that a defected product in fact directly caused their injury. Does tort law make it easier to deal with product liability cases over contractual law? Or does tort make it

Law, Tort Law, Criminal Law, Contracts, And Civil Procedure

1720 words - 7 pages Running head: Law, Tort Law, Criminal Law, Contracts, and Civil Procedure | | | Law, Tort Law, Criminal Law, Contracts, and Civil Procedure In defining the term law, tort law, criminal law, contract and the sources from which law derives, I will use a case that took place in 1929 “Donoghue v Stevenson” to demonstrate the these laws which will show a successful negligence suit, as well as

Lol Lol Lol Lol

1590 words - 7 pages Commonwealth – this became effective in Australia in 1942 with retroactive effect to 1939. | Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942 (Cth). | The effect was to repeal the Colonial Laws Validity Act 1865 (SEE ACT) in relation to the Commonwealth. | Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1955 (ACT) | S33 provides that liability in damages for negligence includes liability for loss of the plaintiff’s capacity to perform domestic services that he

Related Essays

Negligence In Healtcare Law Essay

2136 words - 9 pages MBA 5101 Unit 1 Case Study Gary Campbell Our text defines a tort as “a civil wrong” and negligence as “a tort, a civil or personal wrong” (Pozgar, 2012). Negligence as it is related to healthcare is an unintentional commission or omission of an act that a reasonably prudent person or organization would or would not do under normal circumstances. Not following a recognized standard of care could be considered negligence. The

Business Law Essay

706 words - 3 pages . Abnormally dangerous activities c. Product liability i. Role of privity ii. Difficulty in showing negligence with complicated products and manufacturing techniques 2. Early Dimensions of Product Liability Law a. Role of Restatement (Second) Torts b. Elements under Section 402(A) i

Unit 2 Assignment Ls311

762 words - 4 pages up and eyes straight in front of you. References: Negligence, required elements. (n.d.) West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. (2008). Retrieved September 8 2015 from Unit

Aspects Of Contract And Negligence For Business

527 words - 3 pages tort and contractual liability 3.1.1 The similarities and differences between liability in tort and contractual liability A tort is civil wrong for which precedents and legislative enactments imposes legal liability as personal injury, psychiatric harm, damage to property and economic loss in negligence, undermining reputations in defamation or the interference with the enjoyment of land in nuisance.(Allison, 1996) Contract law imposes obligations