This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Law Letter For Tribunal Case Essay

1219 words - 5 pages

Asia Ghaza
263 Woodpecker Road
Islington , Tamworth
David Smith
69 Rocky Lane
Northfield , Birmingham
B14 J8C

Dear Mr Smith,
I am writing to you regarding your upcoming case for theft which you are currently on bail for. I know at the moment you are unsure on whether you should elect for the trial to be in the Magistrates Court or Crown Court.
You have the decision in which court you would like your case heard. I'll explain the options that you can go through in this letter and then you can decide.
Cases involving theft are treated as either way offences this means you can have the option to have your case heard in either the Magistrates or Crown court. In the Crown ...view middle of the document...

The judge must also check that the Jurors are available for the trial if it were to be a long trial.
Those who sit on the Jury also go through a Vetting process which is to check they are suitable to sit on the Jury. Usually a routine police check is made and sometimes wider background checks are carried out. Once the Jurors are knows for the case the prosecutor and defendant have the right to see the list. The process of challenging a Juror can be either where challenging an individual juror. There must be a valid reason why they shouldn’t not be on the jury for example disqualifications which I explained earlier in the letter or if they know a witness or defendant. The prosecution only has the right to stand by jurors. It allows a juror that has been stood by to be put to the end of the list of potential jurors and will only be used if there are not enough jury members. The Jurors will be called and their names read out by the court clerk as each juror comes into the Jury box to be sworn. They can make notes during the trial to help make their decision. The Jury after hearing the case will retire to the Jury room where all 12 people will decide guilty or not guilty. Ten or Eleven votes is called a majority verdict.

Now when deciding whether to have a trial with a Jury there is a few things you should think about the arguments for and against.
Arguments for Juries - Maintains public confidence, a fair trial, can reduce the harshness of the law, Juries can get the verdict 'right' and the Jury can also be good judges of the facts.
Arguments against Juries - Can be influenced by the media, may not be able to understand complex issues, can get verdict wrong, may not understand the burden of proof in the trial, trials are lengthy and expensive and they tend to acquit more than magistrates.
If you were to take your case to the Magistrates Court it would be dealt with by Lay Magistrates. Magistrates work for free and have at least 26 days of service in court plus training and preparation each year. Anyone between the age of 18-65 can be appointed. Magistrates can also be known as Justice of Peace. There are 30,000 magistrates and sit in threes mostly in criminal cases. Magistrates are recruited and selected by a network of 47 local advisory committees made up of serving magistrates and local non-magistrates.
Magistrates are also legally entitled to time...

Other Papers Like Law Letter for Tribunal Case

Securitisation Act Essay

3087 words - 13 pages prescribed by the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 ("DRT"). Therefore, there are parallel provisions for recovering these dues. This might lead to a lot of confusion for a layman when it comes to understanding the process of enforcement of security interest. In case the secured creditor is not satisfied with the decision of the DRT, a further appeal can be filed to the Appellate Tribunal ("DRAT"). Thirdly, this

Report Islamic Financial Cases

4483 words - 18 pages Islamic country where there is some reticence towards non-litigation forms of dispute resolution. In Middle Eastern states, many people have also been sceptical of using alternative dispute resolution since the outcome of a series of oil concession arbitrations conducted in the 1950s to 1970s. In these arbitrations the local laws were refused and Western systems of law took priority. For example, prior to the tribunal award in Saudi Arabia v Arabian


2067 words - 9 pages the establishment of the ICTY fell squarely within the power of the Security Council under article- 41 of the United Nations charter and that ICTY had been ‘lawfully established’. The Appeals Chambers determined that there had been a threat to the peace in the former Yugoslavia justifying the Security Council’s invocation of chapter- VII served as an appropriate legal basis for establishing an international criminal tribunal. 2. The

Bussiness Ethics

4230 words - 17 pages proven, the Charge would not constitute Misconduct; 3) refer the matter for hearing by the Tribunal; or 4) in the case of criminal activity, refer the Charge(s) and all investigation results to the appropriate authority. 2.6 PROCEDURE FOR A MISCONDUCT HEARING BEFORE A TRIBUNAL 2.6(a) Upon the decision by the Committee that a matter should be heard, all parties shall be notified and a hearing date shall be set. The hearing shall

Arbitration Clause

2230 words - 9 pages ; - The way of appointing the arbitrators; - The applicable law. The arbitral tribunal may be constituted by a sole arbitrator, according to the agreement of the parties or by an equal number of arbitrators nominated by each party. As a rule, in the second case, the arbitrators nominated by each party choose a chairman of the arbitral tribunal. Otherwise, the chairman is appointed by the arbitration body. Concerning the choice of arbitrators in

Longest Running Cartel in South Africa

1759 words - 8 pages at the nature, duration and extent of contraventions. Imposed a penalty of R16 882 597 on SPC (10% of total turnover) and Conrite was fined R 6 192 457 (8% of total turnover). Analysis The approach followed by the Tribunal in this case shows that penalties for cartels of long duration will attract maximum penalties. Appeal Facts: both SPC and Conrite appealed the Tribunal’s decision. SPC Argument In its appeal, first appellant

Case Brief Unit 3; Pa205

544 words - 3 pages Good Samaritan Center, Inc. Mitchell applied for unemployment compensation benefits on June 12, 1974, she was denied these benefits finding that Mitchells act were constituted as misconduct. Being denied disqualified her for the seven weeks of benefits pursuant to 59-9-6(B), N.M.S.A.1953. Mitchell filed an appeal on July 24, 1974. The referee of the Appeal Tribunal reversed the deputy’s decision and reinstated these benefits to Mitchell on August 28

Mitchell V. Lovington

578 words - 3 pages whole Commission pursuant to § 59-9-6(E), N.M.S.A. 1953. The Commission overruled the Appeal Tribunal and reinstated the seven week disqualification period. Mrs. Mitchell then applied for and was granted certiorari from the decision of the Commission to the District Court of Bernalillo County pursuant to § 59-9-6(K), N.M.S.A. 1953. On January 16, 1976, the District Court reversed the Commission's decision and ordered it to reinstate the benefits to

Employemt Law

2901 words - 12 pages it wrong for a tribunal to ask itself whether an employer has acted reasonably or unreasonably so long as it went on to ask the fundamental question whether the conduct, even if unreasonable, was calculated to destroy or seriously damage the relationship of trust and confidence between the employer and employee. In conclusion the primarily concern with this case was not with the academic quality of the work but with the matters that fell

Self Employment Versus Employment in the Uk

994 words - 4 pages the job performance and also who takes the responsibility for any correction in case of unsatisfactory work? One of the last things to think about is your holiday and sickness entitlement. Under The Working Time Regulation case law you could find out more than in this letter that the holiday pay is usually the right of employees of the company but in some circumstances self-employed persons acquire right to that. They have to be engaged for

My Advice on Employee Management

925 words - 4 pages email must clarify whether the employee is being given notice and required to work it or whether his employment is being terminated with immediate effect with him being given a payment in lieu of notice. If an employee considers dismissal: Do these laws apply to the dismissal? Federation Termination Law State Unfair Dismissal Jurisdiction Does dismissal contravene existing order of industrial tribunal? Is this dismissal for a valid reasons

Related Essays

Law For Management Case Study

1560 words - 7 pages The coursework of Law for Management The issue in the scenario is whether Anna had built a contract with Bella, Carol and Dora based on the Anna’s advisement in the window of newsagent and Bella, Carol and Dora’s different ways of offering to buy the club. It is referred to formation and obligations of contracts. To establish a binding obligation in contract, key component parts of a contract which are offer, acceptance, consideration

Tribunal Court Essay

560 words - 3 pages do not have to pay the whole sum of money. and sometimes one can always represent themselves without the aid of authorised officials. INFORMALITY-it is a bit different from law courts as in law courts wigs and gowns are worn but in this system judiciary dresses as normal everyday worker so it does not create an intimidating atmosphere for people without legal advisors. flexibility SPECIALISATION-tribunal members have all got a speciality in a

Employment Law Essay

1626 words - 7 pages This advice is prepared for Elodie in relation to her summary dismissal as an employee of Jumping Jack’s Day Nursery (the “Nursery”). At the outset, we would ask to see Elodie’s contract of employment and other written terms such as a staff handbook, which govern her relationship with the Nursery. This advice will consider statutory measures and case law together with the ACAS Code of Practice. In advising Elodie there is a need to firstly

Admin Law Essay

2879 words - 12 pages considers issues of procedural fairness in a tribunal hearing. The case of Ashmore v Commissioner for Superannuation primarily concerned the decisions to not recognise late election and to not grant an extension of time relating to the preservation of the applicant’s superannuation benefit. At the initial hearing in which the applicant (Carolyn Ashmore) gave oral evidence, only one senior member was present, contrary to the stipulations of the