This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Kant Imperative Formulation Essay

1181 words - 5 pages

18th century German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) presents a criterion of moral obligation, which he calls the categorical imperative. Kant rejects these traditional theories of morality and argues instead that moral actions are based on a "supreme principle of morality" which is objective, rational, and freely chosen: the categorical imperative. Kant’s clearest account of the categorical imperative is in the Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals.

Kant argues against traditional criteria of morality, and explains why the categorical imperative can be the only possible standard of moral obligation. He begins with a general account ...view middle of the document...

" Morality, then, consists of choosing only those actions that conform to the categorical imperative.

In Section 2, Kant explains key terms, presents different formulations of the categorical imperative, and illustrates the categorical imperative with examples of specific immoral acts. He begins by distinguishing between types of imperatives. Imperatives in general are commands that dictate a particular course of action, such as "you shall clean your room." Hypothetical imperatives are commands that depend on my preference for a particular end, and are stated in conditional form, such as, "If I want to lose weight, then I should eat less." In this case, the command to eat less hinges on my previous preference to lose weight. There are two types of hypothetical imperatives. Problematic-hypothetical imperatives involve rules of skill based on preferences that vary from person to person (such as "If you want to be a doctor then you should go to medical school"). Assertoric-hypothetical imperatives, by contrast, involve rules of prudence based on the preference everyone has to be happy (such as, "If you want to be happy, then you should go skydiving"). None of these hypothetical imperatives, however, is moral imperatives, since the command is based on subjective considerations that are not absolute. A categorical imperative, by contrast, is an absolute command, such as "you shall treat people with respect," which is not based on subjective considerations. Thus, the supreme principle of morality is a categorical imperative since it is not conditional upon one’s preferences. Kant continues by describing the sources of the above types of imperatives. His discussion uses four technical terms:
* Analytic propositions: propositions that are true by definition, such as "All wives are women."
* Synthetic propositions: propositions that are not true by definition, such as "Jones is bald."
* A posteriori knowledge: knowledge attained through the five senses, such as the fact that the door is brown.
* A priori knowledge: intuitive knowledge attained without use of the senses, such as 2+2=4.

Kant argues that problematic-hypothetical imperatives are analytic or true by definition, such as, "If you want to be a doctor, then you should go to medical school." Assertoric-hypothetical imperatives are less clear since the concept of happiness varies so greatly, as in the statement, "If you want to be happy, then you should go skydiving." However, Kant believes that even this statement is true by definition since if we fully understand happiness, we will also know the...

Other Papers Like Kant Imperative Formulation

Immanuel Kant Essay

1115 words - 5 pages will attempt to explain what Kant means by Maxim and Universal Law, and whether his argument is affordable in the 21st century. Of course philosophers are different in their clarifications to their argument and there are not clear way in finding accurate and clear conclusions to their arguments. First of all, we need to understand the Formula of the Universal Law, Kant argue the formulation as "act only on that maxim whereby you can at the same

Critically Evaluate Whether the Main Features of Kant’s Deontological Approach Are Too Restrictive and Fail to Be Applicable to Modern Ethical Issues, Such as Euthanasia

1268 words - 6 pages firmly against euthanasia, on the grounds of self-love. This feeling of self-love has the function of preserving life, and indeed a contradiction results from the idea that individuals have no capacity to love themselves if they do not exist. Thus, Kantian philosophy seems to give an absolute prohibition to suicide. Indeed from his formulation of the categorical imperative, if you can’t unviersalise an action as being beneficial, then it must be

Tui Eth501 Module 1

1834 words - 8 pages place. Categorical Imperative Immanuel Kant was an 18th Century creator of critical philosophy. Immanuel Kant created what he called the Categorical Imperative. Kant broke down the categorical imperative into three sections. • The first section is known as Universal Law Formulation Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should be a universal law (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2008, p. 29) • The

Utilatarianism

612 words - 3 pages actions, deontology demands that the actions, or means, themselves must be ethical. Deontologists argue that there are transcendent ethical norms and truths that are universally applicable to all people. Deontology holds that some actions are immoral regardless of their outcomes; these actions are wrong in and of themselves. Kant gives a 'categorical imperative' to act morally at all times. The categorical imperative, in its most widely used

Deontology

686 words - 3 pages , deontology demands that the actions, or means, themselves must be ethical. Deontologists argue that there are transcendent ethical norms and truths that are universally applicable to all people. Deontology holds that some actions are immoral regardless of their outcomes; these actions are wrong in and of themselves. Kant gives a 'categorical imperative' to act morally at all times. The categorical imperative, in its most widely used formulation

Philosophy Nietzsche

1334 words - 6 pages full capacity for human free will and decisions whether they act morally or not. To her the formulation of truly moral guidelines depends on a person’s ability to meet the demands of a categorical imperative, which she links directly to the notion of internal harmony and self consistency: “For if I don’t want to contradict myself, I act in such a manner that the maxim of my act can become a universal law” (Arendt 69). In paraphrasing Kant, when

Abortion and the Categorical Imperative

1861 words - 8 pages categorical imperative in that she is acting for humankind and not in anticipation of her own well-being or cost-benefit (2. Callahan, Reader, pg. 17). However, according to Kant, if an action is good only as a means to something in particular- in this case, for furthering the genetic inheritance of the human species- it is a hypothetical imperative (3. SPE reader, pg. 57-58). What keeps denying abortion to women from being a categorical imperative

Application of the Normative Ethical Theories on Case 1.2

1567 words - 7 pages evaluates a person’s ethical behavior and his character. These ethics are deontological, and based completely on the moral rules and duties regardless of the consequences or results (5). Kant's first formulation of the Categorical Imperative, the Formula of Universal Law runs: Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law (G 421/39). According to Kant’s Universal Law an individual action

Business Ethics

2201 words - 9 pages collapse of Adelphia Communications as seen through the lens of Immanuel Kant deontological ethics. This analysis will be accomplished by providing a brief time lime of the Adelphia, identifying and discussing two key ethical problems raised and describing what is meant by deontological ethics. More specifically this paper will show how Kant’s Categorical Imperative (CI) applies to this scenario. The latter discussion will apply the deontological

Explain the Origins and Key Ideas Behind Absolutist and Relativist Ethics

868 words - 4 pages formulation of the deontological theory of the Categorical Imperative was essentially absolutist in nature. Moral Absolutism has been favoured historically largely because it makes the creation of laws and the upholding of the judicial system much simpler, and manifested itself in outdated concepts such as the Divine Right of Kings. The opposite view of looking at a situation is the relativist point of view: The theory is that there are no universally

Ethical Theories

2042 words - 9 pages Deontology), or by healthy common sense (Rossian EB Intuitionist Deontology) EP Copyright Gregory B. Sadler, 2011 Deontology: Kant and Ross  Kant’s version: Reason reveals our duty  Categorical Imperative  Can the action be universalized?  Does the action treat people as ends, not just means?  Ross’s Version: Common sense intuition reveals our prima facie duties  Duty of non-injury has priority  Other duties: fidelity

Related Essays

Explain Kant's Categorical Imperative Essay

997 words - 4 pages theory, “Do not act on any principle that cannot be universalised”. The second formulation of the categorical imperative is means to an end, which is to treat humans as ends in themselves, which means that you can’t use a human for another purpose, or a selfish gain, as they are the highest point in creation, for example Abortion, Kant would disagree with abortion as you are not giving the unborn foetus the kindness or respect it would get

Categorical Imperative Essay

1565 words - 7 pages they are rational. Kant proposes three formulations the Categorical Imperative in his Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Moral, the Universal Law formulation, Humanity or End in Itself formulation, and Kingdom of Ends formulation. In this essay, the viablity of the Universal Law formulation is tested by discussing two objections to it, mainly the idea that the moral laws are too absolute and the existence of false positives and false negatives

Philosopy Essay

1138 words - 5 pages college, it is in their best interest to take the SAT. It is all hypothetical depending on your desire, but according to Kant, no matter what your desire is, you should help other people as part of his moral code. Moral requirements are considered categorical, the second formulation of Kant’s idea. The basics of categorical imperative is asking yourself, is the action I’m doing okay to become a universal law. With this principle, it limits

In Favor Of Kant Essay

876 words - 4 pages moral law. For Kant, an action can only be correct, if it is the taken out of duty. He believed that the rightness or wrongness of actions does not depend on their consequences but on whether they act on moral duty. We all have a duty, and those duties should obey the supreme principal which is the categorical imperative. These are duties that we ought to do because they are unconditional commands. The universal law formulation explains that one