This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

‘Investment And Support From Foreign Powers Was The Main Reason The Weimar Republic Survived In The 1920s.’ How Far Do You Agree?

752 words - 4 pages

‘Investment and support from foreign powers was the main reason the Weimar Republic survived in the 1920s.’ How far do you agree?
During the 1920s, there were many ups and downs for Weimar Germany and to start with they struggled and bounced between governments, especially with hyperinflation in 1923. But with the help of foreign support, Weimar was able to make it to the 1930s.
It could be said that the Locarno Pact contributed greatly to the stability of Weimar – this is due to the fact that the Locarno Pact stated that Britain and Italy would come to the aid of Germany if its eastern borders were attacked by France. This provided Germany the security she needed from having very small ...view middle of the document...

Without joining the League of Nations or having Stresemann as the foreign minister, it is unlikely that Weimar would have survived as long as it did – they would not have been welcomed back into Europe as well or even at all, and they would not have been able to secure the Locarno Pact that protected her borders. This would therefore mean that France would be able to attack, minimising their probability of surviving in Europe.
However, it wasn’t just direct support and investment that helped Weimar reach the 1930s. American influence upon Weimar was huge, with culture booming throughout the ‘Golden Years’. This included everything from fashion and hairstyles to literature and art. This was an unprecedented freedom that German people had never experienced due to never being part of anything close to a democracy. The culture boom made many people extremely happy and this lead to a decrease in radical extremists in Weimar – the NSDAP only received 12 seats and 2% of the vote in the 1928 Reichstag elections. The American influence didn’t just help the culture though, because by improving culture, the economy was improved, and this really boosted...

Other Papers Like ‘Investment and Support from Foreign Powers Was the Main Reason the Weimar Republic Survived in the 1920s.’ How Far Do You Agree?

How Far Do You Agree That Lenin’s Leadership Was the Main Reason for Why the Bolsheviks Were Able to Seize Power in 1917

1350 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that Lenin’s leadership was the main reason for why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917. Lenin was a very significant figure during the Russian revolution, under his strong leadership and the advice of some of his advisors, Lenin helped the Bolsheviks come to power. However I would not agree that his leadership was the main reason to why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power as factors such as the weakness

‘The Weimar Government completely Recovered in the period of 1924-1928’. How far do you agree?

572 words - 3 pages ‘The Weimar Government completely Recovered in the period of 1924-1928’. How far do you agree? After thorough research in this topic I am swayed more into agreeing that the Weimar Government did recover. This is because of multiple strong reasons that indicate they recovered. The Weimar was able to stabilise the economy using the Stressman’s Rentmark and taking loans from the USA. With a stable economy this shows that the Weimar

Opposition Was the Main Problem Facing Alexander3. How Far Do You Agree with the Statement?

1343 words - 6 pages remarkable by his conservative views, being part of Slavophiles movement. It was easy for him to influence Alexanders views far before he became Tsar and even after his influence kept pursuing the young Tsar. Because of Pobedonoscevs doctrines Alexander believed in order for Russia to modernise it needs to follow old traditions, so he will be safe from repeating his fathers fate. Pobedonoscev taught Alexander that basis of political stability

How far do you agree with the view that America was a land of opportunity during the 1920s?"

1732 words - 7 pages "How far do you agree with the view that America was a land of opportunity during the 1920s?" Explain your answer using sources 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and your own knowledge. (40 marks) The 1920s are widely known as the 'Boom Era', or the 'Roaring Twenties' and a "decade of lively economic growth" (Source 3), due to the sheer economic success and advancement, and the emergence of the motor car, Hollywood, consumerism and

“Singapore’s Separation from the Federation Was Inevitable.” How Far Do You Agree with This Statement? Discuss

522 words - 3 pages Question) “Singapore’s separation from the federation was inevitable.” How far do you agree with this statement? Discuss. I agree with this statement to a large extent as during the two years when Singapore was part of Malaysia as there was an irreconcilable political difference between PAP and UMNO. Malaysia also thought of Singapore as an economical rival. The only thing that kept the two parties together

How Far Do You Agree That the Most Important Reason for Wolsey’s Fall from Power Was His Failure to Gain a Divorce for Henry Viii?

957 words - 4 pages The most important reason for Wolsey’s fall from power was his failure to gain a divorce for Henry VIII, how far do you agree? Wolsey’s dismissal from Henry’s court came in September 1529, though Wolsey had a plethora of failures before, his fall his failure to get a divorce for Henry VIII proved to be the most significant. This is because Wolsey’s strength of position depended on whether he got Henry what he wanted and the divorce was the

War Was the Most Significant Factor in Causing Change in Russia from 1856-1964. How Far Do You Agree?

2246 words - 9 pages also a significant factor in causing change in Russia from 1856-1964, as it is suggested that it sparked political and economic change. Foreign influence may have encouraged political and domestic reform such as in 1864, a New Judicial System was established, and adapted from the French system, to modernise the law and political system in Russia. This reform clearly shows that Russia was adapting some ideas from the western powers during the

.How Far Do You Agree with the View That the Development of the Cold War in the Period 1945-50 Was the Result of Stalin’s Foreign Policy?

3210 words - 13 pages .How far do you agree with the view that the development of the Cold War in the period 1945-50 was the result of Stalin’s foreign policy? Development of the Cold War, in the five years between 1945 and 1950, could be argued as taking place for a number of reasons and due to various individuals. It could be easy to simply site Stalin as the main reason responsible for it’s outbreak and growth, clear through his approach on communist expansion

How Far Do You Agree with the View That the Development of the Cold War in the Period 1945-50 Was the Result of Stalin’s Foreign Policy?

3182 words - 13 pages supports the idea that Stalin was looking to convert Poland to communism, thus explaining his reluctance to uphold free elections as agreed at Potsdam, and suggesting Western powers had a right to be defensive and take harsher action in their dealings with the USSR. Another example of Stalin’s provocative stance on foreign policy was the use of his Red Army to impose and spread communism throughout Eastern Europe. By the end of the Second World War

How Far Do You Agree That a Study of Russia in the Period from 1855 to 1956 Suggests That Change Was Always Imposed from Above?

1048 words - 5 pages How far do you agree that a study of Russia in the period from 1855 to 1956 suggests that change was always imposed from above? Throughout the period 1855-1956, it’s clear that with both the Tsars and the Bolsheviks, change was, often implemented from both the leaders and the people, However, under both Tsars and the Bolsheviks, they were ruthlessly prevented from striking, having trade unions or really having any control over the future

How Far Do You Agree That the Economy of Tsarist Russia Was Transformed in the Years Up to 1914?

1089 words - 5 pages How far do you agree that the economy of Tsarist Russia was transformed in the years up to 1914? During Alexander III reign, the Country of Russia and its economy was in a very backward state. We saw the Country suffer with extremely low industrialisation, as many of their workforce focused on agriculture. They struggled to sell enough grain at export, in order to fund large scale industrialisation as the serfs were forced by lack of freedom to

Related Essays

The Main Threat To The Stability Of The Weimar Republic From 1919 – 1923 Came From The Political Violence Of The Extreme Right” How Far Do You Agree?

906 words - 4 pages “The main threat to the stability of the Weimar Republic from 1919 – 1923 came from the political violence of the extreme right” How far do you agree? Many have argued that the political violence of the extreme right was the main threat to the stability of the Weimar. However, despite elements of this argument being true; one could suggest that there are other factors that contributed to the end of the Republic, such as the constitution

The Main Threat To Weimar Stability Between 1919 23 Came From The Right. How Far Do You Agree?

868 words - 4 pages The Main threat to Weimar stability between 1919-23 came from the right. How far do you agree? The right WERE a serious problem to stability for the Weimar between 1919-23. But so were the far left, some aspects of the new constitution and the country was also threatened by economic challenges that threatened to overwhelm her. Some of this was due to Versailles but some was due to overspending accrued in the build up to WWI. There can be

How Far Do You Agree That The Impact Of The Second World War Was The Main Reason Why The Position Of African Americans Improved In The Years 1945

1461 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that the impact of the Second World War was the main reason why the position of African Americans improved in the years 1945–55? The impact of the Second World War was, without a doubt, crucial in improving the lives of black Americans over the years 1945-55, as it led to federal support of the cause. However, it wasn’t as important as the use of direct action which, for the first time, was able to convert de jure into de

How Far Do You Agree That The Limited Appeal Of Mazzini's Ideas Was The Main Reason For The Slow Progress Of National Unity In The Years 1815 48?

1530 words - 7 pages the emerging middle class. Consequently, Mazzini was not able to gain support from people that possessed official power, with Charles Albert going so far as to execute twelve of the sixty seven arrested members of Young Italy after an attempted coup in Piedmont in 1833. Instead, he aimed his policies at the working class peasants, who made up 80% of the population in Italy, and over 90% in poorer states such as Naples. By inspiring them to revolt