This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Intentional Torts Essay

725 words - 3 pages

Intentional Tort of Defense
Introduction to Tort
June 7, 2012

On a Saturday night there were an incident between two males and a female in a bar called Bottom’s Up. A man name John had too much to drink and was intoxicated. He was shouting obscenities toward a lady name Jane that was sitting at a table next to another guy name Leroy, which he was a frequent customer. However, Jane ignored John and continued to drink her beer. When she ignored him than he approached her looking disturbed. Leroy asked John over to the bar for a drink, but John told him to mind his own business. John grabbed Jane’s wrist and when he did Leroy grabbed John’s wrist and put him in a neck hold. John was protesting Leroy to let go of him, but Leroy did not let go. Leroy placed John in a chair and told him not to make a move or he will punch him. After the incident happen Jane told Leroy that John was her husband.
1) Why was Leroy taking upon his self to defend Jane, even though she ...view middle of the document...

According to KRS § 503.070, the only time to use physical force upon another person where it is justifiable is when causing serious injury or provokes the use of physical force to the other person.
On a Saturday night when John was intoxicated he was shouting obscenities toward a lady name Jane. He was very rude, obnoxious, and assaulting. Jane was sitting at a table next to Leroy’s, but she ignored John and continues to drink her beer. John was not very please and gave her a disturbed look. When John was shouting to her it became an assault because he intentionally put her in fear. However when he reached out and grabbed her wrist it was considered a battery because John was using force against another person. Leroy had put his hands on John’s wrist, put him in a neck hold, and would not let go, which became a false imprisonment because he was holding John against his will. Leroy was protecting Jane because he saw that she was in fear and was threatened by an attacking force, which is considered defense of persons. According to KRS § 503.070, which was the Kentucky Statute the defense of persons is when causing serious injury or provoked use of physical force to the other person.
Leroy saw that John was intoxicated and put his hands on John because he seen that there was a threat against Jane, which he protected her. The assault, battery, and false imprisonment was involved in this case because John intentionally put fear in her, reached out and grabbed her wrist, but when he did than Leroy stepped in. Leroy grabbed John’s wrist and put him in a neck hold and didn’t let him go, which is considered false imprisonment. According to KRS § 503.070, only time it is justifiable in using defense of others is when causing serious injury or provoked use of physical force to the other person. Assume that Leroy can prove that John acted with the requisite intent, John will be liable for assault, battery, and false imprisonment.
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 503.070 (2012).
Buckley, W.R. & Okrent, C. J Torts and personal injury law 3rd ed. Ch.6 & 7 (2004).

Other Papers Like Intentional Torts

Business Torts Ethics Essay

1172 words - 5 pages should be held liable for the emotional distress. The other potential tort concerning the business context in question is intentional interference. The invasion into Sharon’s apartment results in intentional interference as the wrongdoer committed the action knowingly. This is known as a civil wrong. Also, the assault on Sharon and Daryl is part of intentional torts as the intruder intended to cause injury. Ways to Prevent or Mitigate the

Business Law Essay

706 words - 3 pages Chapter 10: Torts: Negligence and Strict Liability After covering intentional torts in the previous chapter, in this chapter we turn out attention to the remaining types of torts. Perhaps the most important of the three types of tort liability, negligence, receives extended treatment in this chapter. The purpose is to provide the student with an in-depth understanding of the elements of negligence, including duty of care, breach of the


3153 words - 13 pages , Intentional Torts, and Quasi-Torts. The standard action in tort is negligence. The tort of negligence provides a cause of action leading to damages, or to relief, in each case designed to protect legal rights, including those of personal safety, property, and, in some cases, intangible economic interests. Negligence actions include claims coming primarily from car accidents and personal injury accidents of many kinds, including clinical

Intentional Tort Paper

1156 words - 5 pages he would punch him. It was after this that the woman informed Mr. McPhillen that John was her husband. ISSUE: (1) Which intentional torts were committed and (2) what are the defenses available to the tortfeasors? Short answer: John and Leroy are both guilty of committing intentional torts. However, both parties have arguable defenses. More information is needed in regards to the events that took place prior to the man assaulting the

Bug Usa Scenario

570 words - 3 pages University of Phoenix Material BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. Defamation was carried out in this scenario, it was a tort and it was intentional. In the defamation that is shown within, there are 4 total factors shown, defamation only

Erm Paper

1629 words - 7 pages A tort is a civil violation that causes injury or harm to a party, which tort law seeks to provide relief for those damages (Tort Law Overview, 2010). There are several main categories of tort law that are “intentional torts, negligent torts, and strict product liability torts” (Tort Law Overview, 2010, para. 4). We will use the above-mentioned categories to discuss the tortious acts caused by Nonlinear Pro against Quick Takes Video. We will

Assessing and Managing Legal Risks in Business

1349 words - 6 pages types of torts: intentional, and negligence. The violation that was incurred five years ago could have been considered a strict liability tort. Alumina was careless. It did not have a system in place to monitor concentration levels prior to an EPA inspection. There was a duty to act; it was breached: a standard of care was not met; causation the environment would not have been affected if PAH concentrations had remained within EPA limits. The

Outline to Buis 301 Test 2

803 words - 4 pages OVERVIEW OF TORT LAW -tort -tortfeasor -Tortious conduct SOURCE OF LAW -restatement of torts -second restatement CATERGORIES OF TORTS -intentional, negligence, strict liability -intentional tort PG209 INTENTIONAL BUSINESS-RELATED TORTS -defamation -defamation statement -dissemination to a third party -specificity -damages PUBLIC FIGURE STANDARD -malice -reckless disregard for the truth PG 210 PRIVILEGE DEFENSE TO

Synopsis of Tort Cases Paper

1753 words - 8 pages . Stadium will be responsible for the damages of Malik hurting himself because the stadium property was not in good repair. Also Patrick was an employee and will be responsible for Daniel’s health related issues. Mike, will be responsible for firing Daniel and will be required to restore Daniels job. Scenario 2: Scenario 3: In this scenario, the Tort actions in this scenario consist of Intentional Torts of Assault & Battery, Defamation of

Tort Law Homework

1878 words - 8 pages affected the content of tort rules and doctrines and also affected the changing state of tort law in America. There are many categories of Torts. It divided three parts which are Negligence, Intentional Torts, and Quasi-Torts (Liability Torts). The standard action in tort is negligence. The tort of negligence provides a cause of action leading to damages, or to relief, in each case designed to protect legal rights, including those of personal

School Sport Injuries and Negligence

1211 words - 5 pages of the law that subjects educators to personal liability. There are a variety of torts, which can basically be divided into three types of torts: (1) intentional torts, the intent to do harm to a person, (2) negligent torts, no intent to do harm to a person but to fail to exercise proper care and (3) strict liability, actions that causes damages regardless if the person is not at fault or negligent. Of the three categories

Related Essays

Intentional Torts Od Leroy Mcphillen Essay

1024 words - 5 pages Intentional Torts and Defenses of Leroy McPhillen and John Victoria Downie Kaplan University Professor Randee Breiter Torts and Personal Injury PA165 May 31, 2015 Intentional Torts and Defenses of Leroy McPhillen and John Human and animal nature is defined by the subconscious behavior of the fight or flight instincts. People have the ability to view situations and determine whether they need to fight for their

The Law Of Tort Definitions And In Depth Analysis

304 words - 2 pages or for monetary damages.(See Damages) Among the types of damages the injured party may recover are: loss of earnings capacity, pain and suffering, and reasonable medical expenses. They include both present and future expected losses. There are numerous specific torts including trespass, assault, battery, negligence, products liability, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Torts fall into three general categories: intentional

Pa165 Unit 3 Assignment

1192 words - 5 pages : Which intentional torts were committed? What are the defenses that are available to the tortfeasor? SHORT ANSWER: John and Leroy are both guilty of committing intentional torts. Both parties have arguable defenses to their actions that night. Regarding the events that occurred prior to the assault and battery on Jane, and the amount of time of John’s confinement needs more information. Intentional Torts Committed: 1. The first

Impairment And Disability Act Essay

617 words - 3 pages . I called management who said that yes I could file charges of malpractice and even the urologist had sent them a letter stating that the ER doctor simply "didn't want to deal with me". It was a life changing even that I will never let happen again. Intentional torts are the infliction of injury or damage to property that was carried out with malice, willfulness or reckless disregard for the other person's rights. In the health care field this