This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Intentional Tort Paper

1156 words - 5 pages

Kaplan University
PA165 – Unit 3 Assignment
November 30, 2014

Leroy McPhillen was visiting The Bottom’s Up Pub, a place he frequented often, when an inebriated man named John caused a commotion by yelling obscenities at a woman sitting at a table near Leroy. Though the woman ignored the man’s shouting the man began to approach her in an aggressive manner. Mr. McPhillen stopped the man before he reached the woman’s table and invited him for a drink at the bar. The man refused, telling Mr. McPhillen that he should mind his own business, and grabbed the woman by her wrist. It was then that Mr. McPhillen twisted the man’s other arm behind his back carefully and restrained ...view middle of the document...

John could also be guilty of committing Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, depending on what he had been shouting at the woman. Okrent, C., & J.D.. (2009).
Mr. McPhillen is also guilty of committing Assault and Battery when he physically restrained John. The three basic elements to battery include unconsented physical contact, offensive or injurious contact, and the tortfeasor’s intent to touch in an offensive or harmful manner. By ordering the man to sit the chair and not allowing him to get up, Mr. McPhillen has also committed the intentional tort, False Imprisonment. There are four elements of false imprisonment and they include unconsented confinement, tortfeasor’s intent to confine, and no practical way of escape. The fourth element includes confinement for a substantial duration of time. Though the hypo do not give a specified amount of time, for Mr. McPhillen to have committed false imprisonment, the duration of time in which he confined John must be significant before a charge could be brought forth. Okrent, C., & J.D.. (2009). 
IC 35-42-2-1 – Assault and Battery
Assault is committed when the tortfeasors has intentionally placed another person in reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm.
Battery is committed when a person knowingly or intentionally touches another person in a rude, insolent, or angry manner.
False Imprisonment
Under Indiana law, false imprisonment is defined as the unlawful restraint upon one's freedom of movement or the unconsented deprivation of one's liberty.
Mr. McPhillen can be charged with the following:
Assault and Battery
Defense: In Defense of Persons, a person may use reasonable force against another person to protect a third person in the event of imminent use of unlawful force.  Under IC 35-41-3-2, Mr. McPhillen has fulfilled all of the elements necessary to declare Defense of Persons.
Elements: (1) use of reasonable force, (2) to defend or protect a third party from injury, (3) when the third party is threatened by an attacking force. Mr. McPhillen did use reasonable force to restrain John and to protect the woman from injury. The force used was not excessive given the man’s aggressive behavior. Given the fact that the intoxicated man intended to cause harm to the woman, and the fact that Mr. McPhillen was unaware of the two’s relationship, he was well within the law’s limitations when he restrained John.
False Imprisonment
Defense: Because Mr. McPhillen was coming to the aid of another...

Other Papers Like Intentional Tort Paper

Assessing and Managing Legal Risks in Business

1349 words - 6 pages defense would be the assumption of risks. However, the EPA could have selected to view it differently since Alumina violated a stature. Legal counsel for Alumina could charge the newspaper and Mrs. Bates with intentional torts. The paper and Mrs. Bates have made untrue statements regarding Alumina. They have been related to third party, published and continued to be published thus, meeting the tort of defamation with possible malice

Tort Law Homework Essay

1878 words - 8 pages affected the content of tort rules and doctrines and also affected the changing state of tort law in America. There are many categories of Torts. It divided three parts which are Negligence, Intentional Torts, and Quasi-Torts (Liability Torts). The standard action in tort is negligence. The tort of negligence provides a cause of action leading to damages, or to relief, in each case designed to protect legal rights, including those of personal

Sort Paper

908 words - 4 pages Short Paper At the creation of the United States, the states were assumed to have the power and authority of self-governing nations. Each state has the general power to protect the health of its population within its geographic borders as long as the laws do not obstruct the rights of individuals guaranteed by the constitution. The federal government regulates health matters through the powers granted to the federal government in the federal

Haimes V Vandevender

3442 words - 14 pages Introduction The most basic definition of tort law is a “civil wrong which can be redressed by awarding damages” (Cornell University, 2010). Through the following paper, this basis definition will be used to decide whether two cases, Haimes v. Temple University Hospital and Vandevender v. Sheetz, Inc. were frivolous and whether the outcomes were appropriate. Throughout this paper, eight questions will be applied to determine the merit of the

Alumina, Inc

1443 words - 6 pages the act was to move water regulation from the local level to the federal level. Under the act, the EPA was designated as the governing body to regulate water pollution control. Tort Liability Tort liability includes three components that significantly impact a company that is allegedly in violation of federal statutes that regulate chemical waste discharges for a particular industry. The three types are intentional torts (defamation


1148 words - 5 pages wil explain some othem that could affect food retailer store like Kudler Fine foods. A negligent or intentional civil wrong not arising out of a contract or statute. These include "intentional torts" such as battery or defamation, and torts for negligence. As Kudler expanding, it could face Tort issues. Kudler may avoid any tort problem by following legal procedures. Negligence: Negligence is usually defined as the failure to exercise the

Jp Morgan

1432 words - 6 pages read and understand the terms of a contract then act in good faith to honor the terms of the bank if they choose to commit to sign the contract. In 2005 Jennings wrote that the major difference between intentional and torts and negligence is based on the state of mind. We say that the person intended to commit an act when we are referring to an intentional tort. In contrast, even though an individual may have been carefree and may not have

Criminal Law

2846 words - 12 pages Doctrine of vicarious liability The doctrine of vicarious liability generally operates within the law of torts. It has become well-established in English law and historically has been called “Master and Servant liability,” which clearly indicates the circumstances in which the doctrine becomes applicable in tort law. The general rule in tort law is that a person who authorises a tort will personally be liable for damage or harm as a result

Courtroom Psychology

2328 words - 10 pages Abstract How human beings judge others has been the subject of many psychological studies over the years. In this paper, psychology in the legal arena is discussed including jury selection, juror life experiences and how it affects their biases, and the impact of the media on their decisions. Jury Selection and Its Importance Juries have the all too important task of making life altering decisions dealing with money, freedom

Law 531 Final Exam Latest Uop Assignments

4255 words - 18 pages competing cellphone manufacturers. Jane, a customer at Teledor, is told by an employee that Comunika phones have weak battery back-up and are very prone to damage. The employee makes these remarks even though he knows that they are completely false. Jane, who has been contemplating between Teledor and Comunika, is influenced by what she hears and purchases a Teledor phone. What kind of intentional tort should be used against Teledor in this

Bullies in the Workplace

4686 words - 19 pages class who might be able to establish a claim against their employer under existing discrimination laws. Federal courts have not yet extended the hostile workplace doctrine to prohibit workplace bullying conduct based on characteristics other than sex, race, national origin, etc. The preferred avenue for employees seeking relief for abusive treatment in the workplace has been the state common law tort claim of intentional infliction of

Related Essays

Intentional Tort Essay

1223 words - 5 pages What establishes a claim for Intentional Tort? In regards to intentional torts, can Farmer have any valid claims for damages against Pilot? What intentional torts can be claimed amongst Dan and Pilot? With the case presented here, an intentional tort does not seem sufficient. Dan hired Pilot, the owner of a passenger plane, for a two-hour flight. After an hour into the flight, the plane began to lose altitude for no apparent reason. Pilot

Pa165 Unit 3 Assignment

1192 words - 5 pages intentional tort of Assault and Battery occurred when John began shouting obscenities at Jane. John then approached Jane in a threatening way, and grabbed her wrist. Even though John and Jane are married this is still considered assault. According to Chapter 5 Intentional Torts: Injuries To Persons (2011) all the elements that were necessary to establish this intentional tort is present. 2. The Second intentional tort of Assault and Battery occurred

Synopsis Of Tort Cases Essay

3448 words - 14 pages Synopsis of Tort Cases In this paper, you will find synopsizes of four tort cases. Each scenario will include the type of tort actions in the case, potential plaintiffs and defendants, elements of the tort claim that constitute the plaintiff’s claim as well as any defenses that the defendant may assert. Additionally, you will find the writer opinion as to how they believe the claim will be resolved along with the legal reasons for their

Synopsis Of Tort Cases Paper

1753 words - 8 pages Synopsis of Tort Cases Paper Matt Howze, Kim Woodard, Anthony Fennell, Mario Hauser, Mike Anson BUS/415 Mrs. Pamela Weddell June 12, 2011 Introduction Throughout this reading, we have evaluated several scenarios and made legal decisions based on the information that we know and the information that we have learned in the previous chapters. Our goal is to determine the tort actions seen in the scenarios identify potential plaintiffs