How Significant Was The Work Of Reforming Leaders In Changing The Nature Of Russian Government And Society In The Period From 1856 To 1964?

2286 words - 10 pages

How significant was the work of reforming leaders in changing the nature of Russian government and society in the period from 1856 to 1964?

It is debatable whether or not the work of some reforming leaders changed the nature of Russia, as rulers such as Nicholas II had done little to reform, and only tried in an attempt to strengthen his own autocratic rule, whereas rulers such as Lenin completely changed the structure of Russian government and society, leaving significant impacts still recognised today in modern Russia.
Looking at the debate from a structuralist view point, it is plain to see that other factors, such as war, famine and peasant revolution played a heavy part in changing ...view middle of the document...

The two most significant reforms made, in my opinion, were the emancipation of the serfs and education.

The Emancipation of the serfs manifesto, released in 1861, had major impacts on Russian society. Addressed as the 'principal handicap to Russia's development'[5] it became undeniable that serfdom needed to be abolished in order for Russia to develop industrially and become equal to other European powers, such as Great Britain.
Land reforms made alongside the Emancipation proved deleterious to the finances of the state, a sign of this was the growing amount of redemption and poll tax arrears, which would be a feature for the next 20 years, as the land reforms proved damaging to the entire structure of Russia by creating deficits, impacting society greatly as it placed the peasant farmers at the mercy of their landlords and leaving them with unreliable crops, causing mass civil unrest in all but one provinces affected by this reform.
It is argued by Historians such as Carl Peter Watts that 'the real significance of the abolition of serfdom was the impetus that it gave to further reforms'[6]. In my own opinion, the significance of the Emancipation was that it highlighted the peasants 'inability to limit their demands and hopes'[7] showing that reforming leaders needed to make change to the exact standards of the Russian peasants.

Other key reforms were made to education, which were ‘notable in the reign of Alexander II’.[8] University students were free to study abroad for a year so had access to passports. This allowed them to experience Western Europe and constitutional governments, making comparisons between countries such as Great Britain and Russia. The students soon became aware of the backwardness of Russia and the need for change. A constitutional government rapidly became desirable in Russian society, but due to the belief that the autocratic rule of the Tsar was a God given right to the Romanov family, the reform would not come effortlessly.

The assassination of Alexander II had a traumatic effect on the reign of Alexander III, as he was 'deeply suspicious of the direction in which his father had taken Russia'[9] as he was aware that the reforms made had ultimately led to his father’s death. Abandoning his father’s plans to grant a Constitutional government, he declared that 'only "absolute autocracy" in the form it was practiced during Peter I and Nicholas I could fight the revolutionary movement'[10]
Because of this, it came as no surprise that the only reforms made during the reign of Alexander III were to strengthen the autocratic rule, and fight opposition, having significant impacts not only on Russian government, but society as well.

To fight the 'terror'[11], Alexander III introduced harsh security measures, which to some extent can be seen as reforms, to ‘correct what he considered as the too liberal tendencies of the previous reign’[12]
Police oppression was tightened and censorship was increased, this impacted...

Other Papers Like How Significant Was the Work of Reforming Leaders in Changing the Nature of Russian Government and Society in the Period from 1856 to 1964?

How Far Do You Agree That a Study of Russia in the Period from 1855 to 1956 Suggests That Change Was Always Imposed from Above?

1048 words - 5 pages How far do you agree that a study of Russia in the period from 1855 to 1956 suggests that change was always imposed from above? Throughout the period 1855-1956, it’s clear that with both the Tsars and the Bolsheviks, change was, often implemented from both the leaders and the people, However, under both Tsars and the Bolsheviks, they were ruthlessly prevented from striking, having trade unions or really having any control over the future

‘The Weimar Government completely Recovered in the period of 1924-1928’. How far do you agree?

572 words - 3 pages ‘The Weimar Government completely Recovered in the period of 1924-1928’. How far do you agree? After thorough research in this topic I am swayed more into agreeing that the Weimar Government did recover. This is because of multiple strong reasons that indicate they recovered. The Weimar was able to stabilise the economy using the Stressman’s Rentmark and taking loans from the USA. With a stable economy this shows that the Weimar

How Significant Was The Role Of Albert Speer In Hitler's Plans For Winning World War Two?

1848 words - 8 pages the enemies fighting capacity. He was also in charge of rebuilding the railwaysdestroyed in the Ukraine by Russia's scorched earth policy, so as to aid transport and supply of troops.In some cases, it would seem that Speer worked towards winning the war in spite of Hitler's plans, ratherthan with them. In 1942, after talks with Hitler during the Russian advance, Speer said that he believedHitler to be weak for not restricting the consumption of

How Significant Was National Resentment of Foreign Interference in Bringing About the Collapse of the Qing Dynasty in 1911-1912?

534 words - 3 pages factors responsible for the fall of the dynasty due to foreign interference. The war with Japan was followed by a series of treaties with the European powers and the USA. They obtained concessions from the Chinese government and China was often forced to pay indemnities to the western powers in exchange for loans. The efforts of reform that had been put in place in the wake of the boxer rebellion begin to stall out in 1908 when Guangxu and

The Nature Of Justice In Society And The Individual According To Plato

2358 words - 10 pages is something that is most easily understood through the understanding of justice in terms of society. This is like the case in which writing too small to be read, using eyes alone and solitary from a frame of reference, might be capable of understanding if it were to be found writ large elsewhere. “…we shall expect to find that the individual soul contains the same three elements and that they are affected in the same way as are the

How Far Can the Rebellions of 1549 Be Considered a Key Turning Point in the Changing Nature of Rebellion Against Tudor Rule in England 1485 to 1587?

2064 words - 9 pages How far can the rebellions of 1549 be considered a key turning point in the changing nature of rebellion against Tudor rule in England 1485 to 1587? The period between 1485 and 1587 sprouted a large amount of rebellions during the reign of the Tudors. The 1549 rebellions can be seen as significant in the changing nature of rebellion based on numerous factors. Yet were there any other rebellions which contributed more to the changing nature

Russian Revolution Analysis, How The Leaders That Came To Power Solely Wore The "Robes Of The Tyrant It Has Disposed."

1003 words - 5 pages the leadership.The essential cause of Kerenskys claim to power, would also prove to be his downfall. A prime example of continued public unrest was displayed in the Kornilov revolt in September of 1917. A renowned Russian general, he and his subordinates mutinied; civil disobedience which defined popular feeling. The three named enemies spread out the forces of the provisional government. The foundation of the country based on the public was

Asses the Nature and Extent of Secularisation in Society Today

625 words - 3 pages religion spearheaded the process of rationalisation. Weber claimed that the spirit of capitalism had its origins in early forms of Protestantism, particularly Calvinism. The spirit of capitalism was one of the main factors in the development of rational capitalism. Once on its way, modern society no longer needed religions to guide action - reason was now a sufficient guide. Hamilton (2001) summarises Weber’s views. “Calvanistic Protestantism was its own gravedigger. In many ways, it could not help but sow the seeds of secularisation in modern society by its own promotion of worldly activity and consequent expansion of wealth and material well being.”

The Role of Individuals in Russia Between 1855-1964

2336 words - 10 pages How significant was the role of individuals in the making of modern Russia 1856-1964 The influence of individuals in the making of modern Russia fluctuated recurrently in the years 1856-1964. T, this was mainly due to the instability of the government and the consequent constraints aswell as outside pressures that were placed on the leaders. Despite this, certain individuals were able to exert a greater influence than others. However, the

To What Extent Was Political Faction Was the Most Important Cause of Rebellion in the Tudor Period?

2223 words - 9 pages ‘Political faction was the most important cause of rebellion in the Tudor period.’ How far do you agree? [60] Political factions throughout the Tudor period seem to be a consistent cause of rebellion. Political factions in Tudor times were individuals or groups who were trying to gain favour of the monarch and rise into the Royal Court and from there into the Privy Council - the advisers to & favourites of the Monarch. The closer you were to

How Far Were the Federal Government and the Supreme Court Responsible for the Changing Status of African Americans in the Years 1945-1968?

2257 words - 10 pages The Federal Government in the United States is divided into three branches, Legislative; Congress, Executive; President and Judicial; The Supreme Court. The Supreme Court therefore forms part of the Federal Government. The Federal Government played a significant part to change the status of African Americans from 1945 to 1968 in the sense that the Presidents during this period; Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy and Johnson all started to become more

Related Essays

War Was The Most Significant Factor In Causing Change In Russia From 1856 1964. How Far Do You Agree?

2246 words - 9 pages socio-political system, civil society and culture. On the other hand, the factor that may challenge war as the most significant factor in changing Russia from 1856-1964 is opposition as it pressurised the regime to keep the population appeased and to achieve this, reform. One way in which war caused change in Russia was that it sparked industrialisation and modernisation. Mostly military defeats in the early part of the period (1856-1917

What Was The Short Term Significance Of The Purges On Russian Government And Society

962 words - 4 pages What was the short term significance of the purges on Russian government and society? The Great terror of the USSR impacted its people greatly. For some, although very few, this impact was good. However, for the majority it was a time of despair, poverty and constantly looking over your shoulder. Primary Material has been used to access the short term impact of the purges on society, the government/communist party as well as the military

In The Context Of The Period 1825 1937, To What Extent Was The First Five Year Plan (1928 1933) The Most Successful Change To Russian Economic Output?

4029 words - 17 pages example being the policy of collectivisation. In addition to this, the next source I used was S. Philip’s 'Stalinist Russia'. This source like Oxley produces an extended cover of the period, producing a balanced piece of work especially since Philip’s has written other works for examinations on the same historical period such as ‘Lenin and the Russian Revolution’. The A2 section also includes a variety of historical interpretations from the

How Significant Were The Divisions Among The Latin Leaders In Bringing About The Fall Of Jerusalem?

803 words - 4 pages in May 1187. Though this view contradicts with Malcolm Barber’s views of Christian sympathy towards Saladin, Pope Urban was not at the Crusades himself and therefore, never knew Saladin who in turn received sympathy and an element of fear from the Latin side. In relation to the question, Source 5 supports the view that the divisions between the Latin leaders were very significant in contributing to their defeat that the Battle of Hattin. The