This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

How Far Was Lenin Responsible For The Bolsheviks Growing Hold On Power In The Years 1917

1004 words - 5 pages

How far was Lenin responsible for the Bolsheviks growing hold on power in the years 1917How far was Lenin responsible for the Bolsheviks growing hold on power in the years 1917-24?
Lenin can easily be considered the most responsible character for the growth in Bolshevik power from 1927. However, there are also other factors which without; Lenin would not have been unable to succeed the way he did, such as the Civil War and the failures of other political powers.
The main reason which Lenin became successful in gaining the Bolsheviks power was his willingness to make concessions. In believing that there was only a small group of people needed to run Russia, even his initial decision to ...view middle of the document...

Lenin was a natural-born leader; he was strong, wise and extremely loyal to his beliefs. The people adored him at first, His April Theses kept his Marxist beliefs in check, and he used it in order to rule Russia in a communist manner. He was also precise, and careful with his methods and rules. He never left any chance of fault. By creating the Cheka, his secret police, he kept political parties at bay and kept order through fear. He used political propaganda in order to influence followers and members of the Bolshevik party, thus maintaining control. Due to his careful planning, and methods, he was becoming more powerful each day. As well as being much organised which made him a strong leader, Lenin also believed in Communism, and ad already much experience in Russia.
Another crucial individual was Trotsky. Although he was originally identifying himself with the Menshevik Party, he was formally admitted to the Bolshevik Party in August 1917. Following the November revolution in which he played a SIGNIFICANT role in the organisation and commanding of the military support for the Bolsheviks. Trotsky continued to command the army when Kerensky threatened to take back Petrograd on November 13th. Being the foreign minister, Trotsky saw the importance of establishing peace, and so took steps towards this in order to fulfil the Bolshevik promise “Peace, land, bread”.
Immediately being made commissar of war, he faced the formidable task or turning the military support for the Bolsheviks into a superior ‘Red Army’ which would protect the Bolshevik government against adversaries, both foreign and home-grown, in the inevitable civil war that was becoming more of a reality as time progressed. Trotsky was passionate and determined and had some military experience which is something that the Red Army (Bolsheviks) lacked. Both Lenin and Trotsky were both organised so they made a good team, they both were good at...

Other Papers Like How Far Was Lenin Responsible for the Bolsheviks Growing Hold on Power in the Years 1917

How Far Was the Russo-Japanese War Responsible for the Outbreak of the 1905 Revolution?

1310 words - 6 pages How far was the Russo-Japanese War responsible for the outbreak of the 1905 Revolution? The Russo-Japanese War lasted from 1904 to 1905, and arose from both Japan and Russia’s desire for expansion and dominance in Korea and Manchuria. Russia suffered many great defeats in this war, against a nation that was considered inferior and was not one of the Great Powers. This humiliated the people of Russia, and caused them to lose confidence in Tsar

How Far Was the Russo-Japanese War Responsible for the Outbreak of the 1905 Revolution?

1794 words - 8 pages money to solve any other problems present Russia, hence partly being responsible for the outbreak of the 1905 Revolution. The war, as all wars do, cost an extreme amount of money. As it resulted in failure no money could be gained from the invaded territories. Russia had already had economic problems, and its economy was still far behind that of other Great Powers. Russia needed more money to invest in the economy to enlarge it, to make it more

The Leadership of Henry V Was Responsible for English Success in France 1415-1420, How Far Do You Agree?

825 words - 4 pages The leadership of Henry v was responsible for English success in France 1415-1420, How far do you agree? The leadership of Henry V was partially responsible for the English success in France during 1415-1420, however it can be argued that luck is a far greater factor to the English’s success, as luck was essential in several battles such as the mud in Agincourt and the fact that the Burgundian and Armagnac division was tearing France apart did

To what extent was Lenin successful in implementing communist ideology after the revolution? (1917-1924)

999 words - 4 pages the party on a platform to move forward and looked at lessening the power of the church. The Russian orthodox church was a strong institution and was seen as a feature of the tsarist regime. Strict measures were implemented during the war for example worship wasn’t allowed until the after the civil war. In the Central Asian regions of Russia interference with religion was minimal. Weak attempts by the Bolsheviks to spread communist ideas using

How Far Were the Federal Government and the Supreme Court Responsible for the Changing Status of African Americans in the Years 1945-1968?

2257 words - 10 pages responsible for changing the status for Black Americans as it was hard for them to convert it to a de jure change as it did not have much of an impact on the American people. In conclusion, the Federal Government was responsible for changing the status of African Americans in the years 1945-1968 as most of the Presidents during this period showed their support for African Americans and created several Acts and laws to improve their living conditions

How Far Was The Russo-Japanese War Of 1904 – 1905 Responsible For The Outbreak Of The 1905 Revolution?

1302 words - 6 pages political problems. This then means that the Russo-Japanese war was partly responsible for the 1905 revolution. The Russo-Japanese war created many huge military defeats which showed the Russian people how weak the military were which therefore caused national humiliation. With the people of Russia humiliated, they began the 1905 Revolution. An example of one of the most humiliating Russian defeats during the war was the Battle of Tsushima in May

‘German Aggression Was Responsible for the Outbreak of a General European War in August 1914.’ How Far Do You Agree with This Judgement?

1246 words - 5 pages that Germany may have provoked Austria-Hungary into “premature war”, they were not the only nation causing general war. The fact that France forced Russia into “fatal mobilisation” suggests that most people ignored other nation’s flaws and their contributions to war, scapegoating Germany in the process. Furthermore, this also argues how Germany’s aggressive Schlieffen Plan was not fully responsible for general war. Furthermore, the 1905-06

Is the Bolsheviks Brutality the Reason They Held Onto Power from 1917-1924?

1358 words - 6 pages Is the Bolsheviks brutality the reason they held onto power from 1917-1924? The Bolsheviks finally had what they wanted- control of Russia. But now that they had the power they had to keep it, whilst trying to gain public support. But during this period of time several hardships were encountered by Russia; the First World War, solved with the treaty of Brest Litovsk; a civil war and one of the worst famines in modern history. The way these

How Far Do You Agree That the Limited Appeal of Mazzini's Ideas Was the Main Reason for the Slow Progress of National Unity in the Years 1815-48?

1530 words - 7 pages would be little place for the church and they would be left with no real power, so naturally, they were determined to hold on to the power they had. Not only would the papacy be able to suppress nationalism in the Papal States, but they would be able to discourage it and turn people away from it throughout Italy due to the fact that the Pope was the religious leader and held a lot of influence over peoples' lives. Most importantly, however, was

To What Extent Was the Papacy Responsible for the Growing Criticism of the Roman Catholic Church?

520 words - 3 pages was a major cause for the criticism. The pope is the most the leader of the Roman Catholic Church and has a major influence over Catholics. At that time, he was also the spiritual leader of most of Europe. He is also supposedly God’s form/representative on earth and should live a good, holy life. However, the popes in this period of time were far from this. They fathered illegitimate children, sinned and were dishonest. They taxed people to fund

In the Context of the Years of 1847- 1947, How Far Was the Partition of India in 1947 Inevitable?

3913 words - 16 pages Unit 4 Historical Enquiry “In the context of the years of 1847- 1947, how far was the Partition of India in 1947 inevitable? “ Pawanpreet Dhaliwal Candidate Number-3049 In the context of the years of 1847- 1947, to what extent was the Partition of India in 1947 inevitable? ------------------------------------------------- The countries India, Pakistan and Bangladesh were once united as a whole Sub-Continent mixed with Muslims, Hindus

Related Essays

How Far Do You Agree That Lenin’s Leadership Was The Main Reason For Why The Bolsheviks Were Able To Seize Power In 1917

1350 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that Lenin’s leadership was the main reason for why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917. Lenin was a very significant figure during the Russian revolution, under his strong leadership and the advice of some of his advisors, Lenin helped the Bolsheviks come to power. However I would not agree that his leadership was the main reason to why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power as factors such as the weakness

Asses The Reasons Why Lenin And The Bolsheviks Were Able To Seize Power In October 1917

2158 words - 9 pages The Bolshevik seize of power in October 1917 was undoubtedly a turning point for Russia’s political situation and a point that would set the tone for the future rulings. It can be easily argued that the Bolsheviks were only able to take over as a result of the long term weaknesses and failures of the Provisional Government. However, as with all events in history, the final seizure in October would not have been possible had it not been for the

How Successful Were The Bolsheviks In Consolidating Their Power Between 1917 And 1924?

991 words - 4 pages How successful were the Bolsheviks in consolidating their power between 1917 and 1924? Scott Anderson In the period 1917-24, the Bolsheviks successfully managed to remain in control of Russia. Consolidating their power meant that they were able to increase their influence within Russia. However, the process to becoming the absolute power was very gradual and involved some very key decisions. To determine how successful we must consider whether

How Far Was The Weakness Of The Provisional Government The Reason For The Bolshevik Success In October 1917?

1696 words - 7 pages for they would be looking for change, looking for something that was different from the provisional government that was failing them. Overall, the strengths of the Bolshevik party played a very important role in the October revolution of 1917, if the Bolsheviks had not acted in the way they did, it is unarguable to say that the revolution would not have been successful and the Bolsheviks would not have come into power when they did. On