This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

How Far Do You Agree With The View That The Origins Of The Cold War In The Period 1945 1950 Owed Much To Ideological Differences And Little To Personalities And Conflicting National Interests?

1136 words - 5 pages

There is a lot of debate of which factor played the largest role in initiating the Cold War during the period of 1945-50. Mostly sources 7 and 9 argue that various ideological differences between the two superpowers were responsible for the origins of the Cold War; while sources 8 and also 9 differ and state that it could have been down to other factors, such as conflicting personalities of the leaders and general national interests.
On the one hand source 7 supports the argument that it was political ideological differences that caused the Cold War, arguing that the USSR was seen as a “unique and unbending armed ideology threatening to expand” which resulted in an “ideological crusade” ...view middle of the document...

As more and more European countries became communist, there was less of a market for USA to be able to sell its products and spread consumerism. Marshall Plan was introduced in 1947 to provide “economic aid to Greece and Turkey” and other European countries; however this only would have caused more tension as the Soviets could have considered this an attack on their ideologies. It can be inferred that source 7 also supports the idea as it states USSR was constantly “threatening to expand” to spread and limit USA’s available market through state-controlled economy. However this argument has its flaws, as many Eastern European countries became communist at their “own will” and this may just suggest that they did not want capitalist ideologies. Source 9 supports this argument – “Europeans themselves were never as psychologically demoralised as the Americans made them out to be”. Thus USA could have falsely blamed USSR for attacking its economic interests. Overall this evidence suggests that while economic ideological differences may not have been the largest factor that initiated the Cold War, it is difficult to dispute that they did not cause tensions between the two superpowers.
On the other hand source 8 disagrees with the statement and implies that conflicting personalities of the leaders of each superpower are to blame for the origins of the Cold War. The source states that “when Roosevelt died and Churchill was not re-elected, Stalin lost his two equals”. This made Stalin more suspicious and also “altered [his] view of the diplomatic landscape”, which could be suggesting there was not only tension between Stalin and the new leaders but also a higher chance of conflict between them. This is evident in the fact that Truman was far more against communism. This can be seen through his implication of the Truman Doctrine in 1947, in an attempt to contain and stop communist expansion. Source 8 supports this piece of evidence by suggesting that it would now be much more difficult to “forge a strong relationship of equals between Stalin and the new Western politicians”. However this argument fails on the account of the fact that Roosevelt and Stalin were able to cooperate during the early 1945, which would imply that the Cold War could not begin in that year, suggesting the fact that it did was down to...

Other Papers Like How Far Do You Agree with the View That the Origins of the Cold War in the Period 1945-1950 Owed Much to Ideological Differences and Little to Personalities and Conflicting National Interests?

How Far Do You Agree with the View That the Development of the Cold War in the Period 1945-50 Was the Result of Stalin’s Foreign Policy?

3182 words - 13 pages surrounding the USSR outraged Stalin and caused great hysteria in Moscow, with Churchill being accused as a warmonger, deliberately provoking the Soviet Union. The speech created an increase in animosity between the superpowers and without a doubt contributed to the outbreak and development of cold war. A final factor demonstrating to be a cause of developing Cold War in the period of 1945 to 1950 was the years of the Red Scare in the USA. The

How Far Do You Agree with the View That Stalin’s Foreign Policy Was a Major Contributing Factor to the Emergence of the Cold War in the Period 1945-50?

564 words - 3 pages During the period of 1945 to 1950 the Cold War developed between the Superpowers of the United States and the Soviet Union. The end of the Second World War had resulted in a power vacuum over war-torn Europe and left a legacy of mistrust and suspicion between the two superpowers. The Yalta and Potsdam conferences proved this as they failed to agree on certain issues and as the leaders of the United Kingdom and United States changed in between

“The Rising Tension Between East And West Between 1945-1949 Was Due To Stalin’S Hold Over Eastern Europe” How Far Do You Agree With This View?

1376 words - 6 pages “The rising tension between east and west between 1945-1949 was due to Stalin’s hold over eastern Europe” How far do you agree with this view? (25 marks) Following the Second World War the post war world was left fragile, disrupted and heavily damaged and it was vital that the future of the East and West were determined quickly and correctly as to avoid a rise in underlying tension. Due to the common enemy of Nazism having been removed, the

How Far Do You Agree That the Impact of the Second World War Was the Main Reason Why the Position of African Americans Improved in the Years 1945

1461 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that the impact of the Second World War was the main reason why the position of African Americans improved in the years 1945–55? The impact of the Second World War was, without a doubt, crucial in improving the lives of black Americans over the years 1945-55, as it led to federal support of the cause. However, it wasn’t as important as the use of direct action which, for the first time, was able to convert de jure into de

How Far Do You Agree That a Study of Russia in the Period from 1855 to 1956 Suggests That Change Was Always Imposed from Above?

1048 words - 5 pages How far do you agree that a study of Russia in the period from 1855 to 1956 suggests that change was always imposed from above? Throughout the period 1855-1956, it’s clear that with both the Tsars and the Bolsheviks, change was, often implemented from both the leaders and the people, However, under both Tsars and the Bolsheviks, they were ruthlessly prevented from striking, having trade unions or really having any control over the future

How far do you agree with the view that America was a land of opportunity during the 1920s?"

1732 words - 7 pages "How far do you agree with the view that America was a land of opportunity during the 1920s?" Explain your answer using sources 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and your own knowledge. (40 marks) The 1920s are widely known as the 'Boom Era', or the 'Roaring Twenties' and a "decade of lively economic growth" (Source 3), due to the sheer economic success and advancement, and the emergence of the motor car, Hollywood, consumerism and

‘The Weimar Government completely Recovered in the period of 1924-1928’. How far do you agree?

572 words - 3 pages ‘The Weimar Government completely Recovered in the period of 1924-1928’. How far do you agree? After thorough research in this topic I am swayed more into agreeing that the Weimar Government did recover. This is because of multiple strong reasons that indicate they recovered. The Weimar was able to stabilise the economy using the Stressman’s Rentmark and taking loans from the USA. With a stable economy this shows that the Weimar

How Far Do You Agree That the Economy of Tsarist Russia Was Transformed in the Years Up to 1914?

1089 words - 5 pages How far do you agree that the economy of Tsarist Russia was transformed in the years up to 1914? During Alexander III reign, the Country of Russia and its economy was in a very backward state. We saw the Country suffer with extremely low industrialisation, as many of their workforce focused on agriculture. They struggled to sell enough grain at export, in order to fund large scale industrialisation as the serfs were forced by lack of freedom to

Compare and Contrast Sherriff's and Faulk's Presentation of the Impact of War on Those Who Fought in World War One. How Far Would You Agree with the View That Sherriff's Choices of Setting and Narrow...

1301 words - 6 pages How does Faulks' presentation of the first day of the Battle of the Somme further your understanding of World War One? Faulks' presentation of the first day of the Battle of the Somme is portrayed brutally and horrifically to convey the fact that it was the worst battle in World War One with a total of approximately 58,000 casualties. As Faulks is a modern writer he is able to see the aftermath of war, the psychological effect on the men who

How Far Do You Agree That Carol Anne Duffy Presents A Cynical View Of Love And Marriage In “The Worlds Wife”?

1406 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that Carol Anne Duffy presents a cynical view of love and marriage in “The Worlds Wife”? I completely agree that in “The Worlds Wife” Carol Anne Duffy presents a critical view of love and marriage. She presents the reader with an array of relentless and unapologetically feminist poems consisting of a large number of personas, who are witheringly contemptuous of the men they have ended up with, generally inadequate, self

'Cb's Sensational Effects Are Always Grounded in the Everyday World'. How Far and in What Ways Do You Agree with This View of 'Jane Eyre'?

984 words - 4 pages 'CB's sensational effects are always grounded in the everyday world'. How far and in what ways do you agree with this view of 'Jane Eyre'? A primary way that the ‘sensational effects’ in ‘Jane Eyre’ are ‘always grounded in the everyday world’ is through Jane’s explanation of supernatural events. Additionally, the shocks and hardships of Lowood School, twinned with the treatment of Jane by Brocklehurst in what seems like a routinely manner

Related Essays

How Far Do You Agree With The View That The Development Of The Cold War In The Years 1945 – 48 Owed More To Soviet Expansionism Than To The Usa’s Economic Interests?

1126 words - 5 pages hand, in line with evidence from sources 8 and 9, USA’s economic interests could have been seen as having the most impact on the development of the Cold War. A further argument could be to suggest that it was in fact due to ideological differences, which is backed by evidence from all three sources. Overall, the development of the Cold War from 1945 – 48 owed more to the USA’s economic interests than any other factor. There is evidence in all

How Far Do You Agree With The View That The Development Of The Cold War In The Years 1945 8 Owed More To Soviet Expansionism Than To Usas Economic Interests?

1044 words - 5 pages How far do you agree with the view that the development of the Cold War in the years 1945-8 owed more to Soviet expansionism than to USA’s economic interests? My opinion is that the development of the Cold War was due to Soviet expansionism rather than the USA’s economic interests in the years 1945-48. The Sources all present to some extent the idea that Soviet expansionism was to blame. Source 7 argues Soviet expansionism as the most

How Far Do You Agree With The View That The Development Of The Cold War In The Years 1945 1948 Owed More Too Soviet Expansionism Than To The Usa’s Economic Interests?

1608 words - 7 pages the Potsdam conference in July 1945 the West were annoyed at how Stalin had been allowed to incorporate some Polish territory into Soviet territory and was transporting Poles west behind the new Polish-Soviet border. All this together escalated the development of the Cold War and it is true that this was vital to the creation of two opposing sides however it seems that the US policies affecting their economy accelerated the development of the Cold

.How Far Do You Agree With The View That The Development Of The Cold War In The Period 1945 50 Was The Result Of Stalin’s Foreign Policy?

3210 words - 13 pages .How far do you agree with the view that the development of the Cold War in the period 1945-50 was the result of Stalin’s foreign policy? Development of the Cold War, in the five years between 1945 and 1950, could be argued as taking place for a number of reasons and due to various individuals. It could be easy to simply site Stalin as the main reason responsible for it’s outbreak and growth, clear through his approach on communist expansion