How far do you agree that Hitler’s Regime was a ‘consensus dictatorship’?
Hitler’s Regime was a consensus “dictatorship” in which allies such as Himmler and Goebbels had a lot of power. It was consensus due to the fact that Hitler aimed for “consent of the initiated” as stated by Robert Gellately. This was evident as many Germans “enjoyed their lives” suggesting that Hitler’s Regime was in fact a consensus dictatorship.
Eric A. Johnson claims that Germany was “regaining its pride” during the years of Hitler’s Regime. During the years of the Weimer Republic Germans suffered terribly, which was due to reasons such as hyperinflation and the fact that unemployment was so poor that 3 ...view middle of the document...
If Germans enjoyed their lives, it suggests that Hitler’s aim to create an authority based on popularity was working effectively and thus leading to a consensus dictatorship.
On the other hand Hitler’s Regime was heavily based on fear and not consent. This is suggested by Mary Fulbrook who disagrees with the fact that it was a consensus dictatorship and instead believes that the regime was full of “terror”. The use of the word terror suggests that the fear in Germany was overwhelming. Many were scared as they may be the victims of “torture and murder”, thus leading to many not opposing the regime.
Mary Fulbrook also states that it was the “SS of Heinrich Himmler” that were able to do as they like without the consent of “rule of law”. This suggests that Himmler also had a lot of power in Nazi Germany, thus he may have been the man behind many schemes. Therefore Hitler’s regime may have not been a dictatorship if allies like Himmler had remarkable power within the country.
While Fulbrook completely disagrees with Gellately’s view of Hitler’s authority...