This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

How Far Do You Agree That Hitler’s Regime Was A ‘Consensus Dictatorship’?

698 words - 3 pages

How far do you agree that Hitler’s Regime was a ‘consensus dictatorship’?

Hitler’s Regime was a consensus “dictatorship” in which allies such as Himmler and Goebbels had a lot of power. It was consensus due to the fact that Hitler aimed for “consent of the initiated” as stated by Robert Gellately. This was evident as many Germans “enjoyed their lives” suggesting that Hitler’s Regime was in fact a consensus dictatorship.

Eric A. Johnson claims that Germany was “regaining its pride” during the years of Hitler’s Regime. During the years of the Weimer Republic Germans suffered terribly, which was due to reasons such as hyperinflation and the fact that unemployment was so poor that 3 ...view middle of the document...

If Germans enjoyed their lives, it suggests that Hitler’s aim to create an authority based on popularity was working effectively and thus leading to a consensus dictatorship.

On the other hand Hitler’s Regime was heavily based on fear and not consent. This is suggested by Mary Fulbrook who disagrees with the fact that it was a consensus dictatorship and instead believes that the regime was full of “terror”. The use of the word terror suggests that the fear in Germany was overwhelming. Many were scared as they may be the victims of “torture and murder”, thus leading to many not opposing the regime.

Mary Fulbrook also states that it was the “SS of Heinrich Himmler” that were able to do as they like without the consent of “rule of law”. This suggests that Himmler also had a lot of power in Nazi Germany, thus he may have been the man behind many schemes. Therefore Hitler’s regime may have not been a dictatorship if allies like Himmler had remarkable power within the country.

While Fulbrook completely disagrees with Gellately’s view of Hitler’s authority...

Other Papers Like How Far Do You Agree That Hitler’s Regime Was a ‘Consensus Dictatorship’?

How Far Would You Agree That the October Revolution Was a Coup Rather Than a Popular Uprising

2502 words - 11 pages How far would you agree that the October Revolution was a coup d’état rather than a popular uprising? On the 25th of September 1917, the then Prime Minister, Kerensky, induced the appointment of a new cabinet. The creation of this cabinet was the fourth Provisional Government, the third coalition and the seventh major reshuffling in the period of time following the February revolution. 1 Having been created as a result of the revolutionary

“Singapore’s Separation from the Federation Was Inevitable.” How Far Do You Agree with This Statement? Discuss

522 words - 3 pages Question) “Singapore’s separation from the federation was inevitable.” How far do you agree with this statement? Discuss. I agree with this statement to a large extent as during the two years when Singapore was part of Malaysia as there was an irreconcilable political difference between PAP and UMNO. Malaysia also thought of Singapore as an economical rival. The only thing that kept the two parties together

Opposition Was the Main Problem Facing Alexander3. How Far Do You Agree with the Statement?

1343 words - 6 pages modernising. Also educational reforms made a new class called “intelligencia” who shared western liberal views. As well as there were extremist groups that felt the only way for Russia to change was eradication of the monarch, they did not have clear aim what to do after. Alexander understood that and he launched strong repressions to preserve stability of monarchy, he believed that they were main threat and problem of Russia. Together with Pobedonoscev he

.How Far Do You Agree with the View That the Development of the Cold War in the Period 1945-50 Was the Result of Stalin’s Foreign Policy?

3210 words - 13 pages .How far do you agree with the view that the development of the Cold War in the period 1945-50 was the result of Stalin’s foreign policy? Development of the Cold War, in the five years between 1945 and 1950, could be argued as taking place for a number of reasons and due to various individuals. It could be easy to simply site Stalin as the main reason responsible for it’s outbreak and growth, clear through his approach on communist expansion

How Far Do You Agree That Lenin’s Leadership Was the Main Reason for Why the Bolsheviks Were Able to Seize Power in 1917

1350 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that Lenin’s leadership was the main reason for why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917. Lenin was a very significant figure during the Russian revolution, under his strong leadership and the advice of some of his advisors, Lenin helped the Bolsheviks come to power. However I would not agree that his leadership was the main reason to why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power as factors such as the weakness

How Far Do You Agree That Trotsky’s Leadership of the Red Army Was Responsible for the Survival of the Bolshevik Government? (30 Marks)

1497 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that Trotsky’s leadership of the Red Army was responsible for the survival of the Bolshevik government? (30 marks) There were many factors that contributed to the survival of the Bolshevik Government, ranging from Trotsky’s leadership of the Red Army to the failings of the Bolsheviks’ rivals for power. This essay shows that the main reason for the Bolsheviks’ continued survival through the period was not Trotsky’s great

How Far Do You Agree That the Impact of the Second World War Was the Main Reason Why the Position of African Americans Improved in the Years 1945

1461 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that the impact of the Second World War was the main reason why the position of African Americans improved in the years 1945–55? The impact of the Second World War was, without a doubt, crucial in improving the lives of black Americans over the years 1945-55, as it led to federal support of the cause. However, it wasn’t as important as the use of direct action which, for the first time, was able to convert de jure into de

How Far Do You Agree with the View That the Development of the Cold War in the Period 1945-50 Was the Result of Stalin’s Foreign Policy?

3182 words - 13 pages be sympathetic to Stalin crossing into Revisionist waters – the source states that he did not want to take a course of “unbridled, unilateral expansionism” over Europe. This idea is hard to believe when looking at the course in which Stalin did indeed take. Though the Red Army never spread through France, it did manage to do so in many areas over Europe such as, Hungary, Romania and Albania. This was achieved by setting up pro-communist

How Far Do You Agree That the Limited Appeal of Mazzini's Ideas Was the Main Reason for the Slow Progress of National Unity in the Years 1815-48?

1530 words - 7 pages Church were far more important reasons for the slow progress of national unity due to the impunity with which they were able to eradicate revolutionary ideas. Furthermore, the lack of willingness by the people of Italy to cooperate with each other for a common goal was more significant than the lack of support for the ideas of one man. To an extent, the nationalist revolutionary ideas of Mazzini were the only reason that the process of unification went as quickly as it did and it is evident that it would have taken a lot longer if were not for the influence and impact that his ideas had on the people of Italy.

How Far Do You Agree with the View That Stalin’s Foreign Policy Was a Major Contributing Factor to the Emergence of the Cold War in the Period 1945-50?

564 words - 3 pages crisis showed that Stalin's expansion through Eastern Europe brought increasing fear across Europe. There was little America or the west could do to stop the Coup without bloodshed or escalation. The Czech crisis seems to suggest that it was totally Stalin's fault in terms of starting the war as he expanded across Europe he came ever closer to America and tension was boiling point. It wasn't just Stalin's policies that are considered to have had a

‘German Aggression Was Responsible for the Outbreak of a General European War in August 1914.’ How Far Do You Agree with This Judgement?

1246 words - 5 pages Moroccan Crisis was also evident of how other nations as well as Germany were to blame for war. The crisis led to a Russian betrayal of Germany, prioritising the Triple Entente instead. As a result, Germany vowed revenge, leading to aggressive strategies to take place. Despite this indicating that German aggression was at hand, it is implied that Russian betrayal was a cause of this aggression – evident that other nations were not just at blame for war

Related Essays

How Far Do You Agree With The View That America Was A Land Of Opportunity During The 1920s?"

1732 words - 7 pages "How far do you agree with the view that America was a land of opportunity during the 1920s?" Explain your answer using sources 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and your own knowledge. (40 marks) The 1920s are widely known as the 'Boom Era', or the 'Roaring Twenties' and a "decade of lively economic growth" (Source 3), due to the sheer economic success and advancement, and the emergence of the motor car, Hollywood, consumerism and

How Far Do You Agree That A Study Of Russia In The Period From 1855 To 1956 Suggests That Change Was Always Imposed From Above?

1048 words - 5 pages How far do you agree that a study of Russia in the period from 1855 to 1956 suggests that change was always imposed from above? Throughout the period 1855-1956, it’s clear that with both the Tsars and the Bolsheviks, change was, often implemented from both the leaders and the people, However, under both Tsars and the Bolsheviks, they were ruthlessly prevented from striking, having trade unions or really having any control over the future

How Far Do You Agree That The Most Important Reason For Wolsey’s Fall From Power Was His Failure To Gain A Divorce For Henry Viii?

957 words - 4 pages The most important reason for Wolsey’s fall from power was his failure to gain a divorce for Henry VIII, how far do you agree? Wolsey’s dismissal from Henry’s court came in September 1529, though Wolsey had a plethora of failures before, his fall his failure to get a divorce for Henry VIII proved to be the most significant. This is because Wolsey’s strength of position depended on whether he got Henry what he wanted and the divorce was the

How Far Do You Agree That The Economy Of Tsarist Russia Was Transformed In The Years Up To 1914?

1089 words - 5 pages How far do you agree that the economy of Tsarist Russia was transformed in the years up to 1914? During Alexander III reign, the Country of Russia and its economy was in a very backward state. We saw the Country suffer with extremely low industrialisation, as many of their workforce focused on agriculture. They struggled to sell enough grain at export, in order to fund large scale industrialisation as the serfs were forced by lack of freedom to