How Far Did Stalin Destroy Lenin’s Legacy?

580 words - 3 pages

How far did Stalin destroy Lenin’s legacy?
Stalin destroyed Lenin’s Legacy:
• Stalin created a personal dictatorship, Lenin ruled through the party etc. Stalin was more interested in furthering his own interests... as suggested by the excessive use of the cult of personality etc.
• Lenin was against the concept of the cult of personality and personal rule, under Lenin there was much more debate within the party, unlike Stalin’s reign where he forced his policies through with the use of fear or the party machine etc.
• It also seems that Stalin was hungry to achieve supreme power right from the word go, using Lenin’s funeral to his own advantage setting himself up as his disciple and also damaging Trotsky’s reputation.
• This would suggest that Stalin did not care so much for the creation of a communist ...view middle of the document...

Stalin also destroyed all most all of the old Bolsheviks/Lenin’s Politburo suggesting that he had no intention of fulfilling Lenin’s legacy.
• Lenin also intended that there would be a revolution of the proletariat, which is far from the revolution from above (Collectivisation/5YPs) that Stalin imposed.
• The view that Lenin was forced by the circumstances of the Civil War and bad economic conditions, he had to create a highly centralised state and had to use War Communism/Repression etc.
Stalin fulfilled Lenin’s Legacy:
• Lenin laid the foundations for Stalinism, i.e. the organs for repression and terror (Secret Police, Labour Camps, show trials, purges... etc) which he had also significantly used during his time in power – even though he did not go to the extent Stalin did.
• Lenin was also the first to say that the Kulaks should be destroyed – this was not necessarily just Stalin’s idea, he was even following Lenin’s orders.
• Lenin was not keen on the NEP, he only saw it as breathing space and time for the economy to recover, he did not intend for it to last long.
• Stalin Five Year Plans were brought about in order to modernise Russia’s industry, Marx wrote that a proletariat revolution could only happen in these conditions, suggesting that Stalin was intending to implement a Marxist-Leninist state.
• Stalin’s ruthlessness in implementing his economic policies could also be compared to Lenin’s War Communism, where grain was taken from peasants by force and repression had to be used to a large extent.
• Stalinism did seem to be the logical conclusion of Leninism, as there was no clear path to follow after Lenin’s death...
• This view is usually taken by anti-communist historians during the cold war – that Lenin was a tyrant of sorts who imposed his will on the people and used repression etc..

Other Papers Like How Far Did Stalin Destroy Lenin’s Legacy?

How Far Did the Political Changes in Germany Between October 1918 and May 1919 Amount to a Revolution?

1082 words - 5 pages How far did the political changes in Germany between October 1918 and May 1919 amount to a revolution? Between October 1918 and May 1919 there was a huge political change in Germany, Germany went from being an autocracy state to a democratic republic. The factors that contributed to this were; the collapse of the 2nd Reich, the Spartacist revolt and the October Reforms. These changes contributed, along with other factors, not linked to the

How far do the sources suggest that Florence Nightingale did ‘not help the side’ in the Crimean War (Source 1, lines 2-3). Explain your answer using the evidence of Source 1, 2 and 3 (20 marks)

632 words - 3 pages How far do the sources suggest that Florence Nightingale did ‘not help the side’ in the Crimean War (Source 1, lines 2-3). Explain your answer using the evidence of Source 1, 2 and 3 (20 marks) I believe that Florence Nightingale did help the side in the Crimean War. Her work being based at Scutari hospital aided the cause significantly. As I said, I do believe she assisted the sick men in the Crimean War, however I feel that her

How Far Did the Roman Empire Stabilise Between 312 and 324ad

1775 words - 8 pages ‘To what extent did the Emperor Constantine reunite the Roman Empire between 312AD to 324AD?’ On the 28th October 312, Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus and Marcus Aurelius Valerius Maxentius collided on a broad plain in front of the Milvian Bridge. The outcome of this fight would determine who the next Augustus of the Western Roman Empire would be. Maxentius, the current Emperor was facing down the usurper at Rome’s door, the young

What Problems Did Alexander II Face In 1855 And How Far Was He Successful In Solving Them?

1169 words - 5 pages marriages. Since 1649, when serfdom was legally established as a means of attaching peasants to the land of the nobility, serfdom had been a key factor in making the noble families wealthier and making it impossible for the serfs to break out of their enslavement.Although when Alexander II became Tsar he made it clear that he was not desperate to emancipate the serfs, but did make it known that freeing the serfs would be in the greater interest of

How Did Ten Years of Stalin's Rule Change Society in the Ussr?

2641 words - 11 pages How did ten years of Stalin’s rule change society in the USSR? Answer with reference to the period 1928-1938. Josef Stalin’s rule of the Soviet Union from 1928 through to 1953 is one of the most controversial periods in Russian history. Stalin’s rule had enormous effect on society in Russia. Before Stalin came to power Russia was a backward country in turmoil just a Few years after world war one, the 1917 Bolshevik revolutions and the civil

How Important Were The Mistakes Of His Opponents In Explaining Stalin’S Victory In The Power Struggle Between 1924 And 1928?

569 words - 3 pages How important were the mistakes of his opponents in explaining Stalin’s victory in the power struggle between 1924 and 1928? Many historians would argue that the mistakes of his opponents played a vital role in explaining Stalin’s victory in the power struggle. However, whilst this did contribute, it is likely that Stalin’s role as General Secretary was the most important factor, with the Lenin Legacy also playing a role. The mistakes

Joseph Stalin

660 words - 3 pages regime, being unsupported by international revolution, was in threat of losing its social qualities. Stalin criticized Trotsky’s publication and accused him in being Menshevik’s theorist. Moreover, Stalin’s words: “… Trotsky’s “permanent revolution” is the negation of Lenin’s theory of the proletarian revolution…” was the first step to destroy once one the most power political figure in the party. (CP I, 67). In 1925, former allies of Stalin in

Why Did Stalin Emerge as the Sole Leader of Ussr by 1929?

1172 words - 5 pages Why did Stalin emerge as the sole leader of USSR by 1929? One of the main reasons why Stalin emerged as sole leader was because of how he used pragmatism to manipulate Lenin’s opinion of him to suggest that he was the most favourable leader to carry on Marxism throughout Russia. This key event that secured Stalin’s public support was around the time of Lenin’s funeral. His role as general secretary gave him the ‘grey blur’ title because

How Far Does a Study of 1855-1964 Suggest That, Following the Revolution of 1917, the Russian People Simply Exchanged One Form of Authoritarianism for Another?

1234 words - 5 pages How far does a study of 1855-1964 suggest that,following the revolution of 1917, the Russian people simply exchanged one form of authoritarianism for another? Once the February revolution brought an end to Tsarist rule, there was a strong belief that the introduction of the Provisional Government would lead to a more democratic Russia. However in deposing the Provisional Government, the October Revolution had removed any such hope. The

The Struggle for Power Contenders

1849 words - 8 pages came to rely on Stalin’s administration ability and loyalty. * Prior to Lenin’s illness, Stalin was careful to back him on controversial issues. * Once Lenin became ill Stalin began to oppose him. * Lenin was highly critical of Stalin in his Testament, particually following a disagreement between Stalin and Lenin’s wife. * Lenin expressed concern that Stalin had concentrated an enourmous power in his hand, and did not always

Fudge Ya Chicken Strips

1890 words - 8 pages the other hand, was perceived as a mediocre and uninteresting party member, he was not thought as a suitable candidate to replace Lenin’s former status. Yet Stalin succeeded in taking power and control over the Soviet party and emerged as the leader of USSR in 1929. This led historians questioning: how and why did he emerge as the leader so unexpectedly? Many people believe that it was his personal skills that gave other factors an advantage. I

Related Essays

How Far Did Nicholas 1 Reform Russia

1052 words - 5 pages the huge population of Russia was continuously increasing at a rapid rate and the fact that he could keep up with the growth of other countries. The main factor in my opinion that just shows how far behind Russia were was the Crimean war as everything they did or used was just so far outdated compared to all there opponents.

How Far Do You Agree That Lenin’s Leadership Was The Main Reason For Why The Bolsheviks Were Able To Seize Power In 1917

1350 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that Lenin’s leadership was the main reason for why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917. Lenin was a very significant figure during the Russian revolution, under his strong leadership and the advice of some of his advisors, Lenin helped the Bolsheviks come to power. However I would not agree that his leadership was the main reason to why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power as factors such as the weakness

How Effectively Did The Occupying Powers Deal With The Nazi Legacy In The Years 1945 1949?

546 words - 3 pages party forming with any major members from the war. It also found the men rightly guilty of their atrocities. However the trials were military tribunals with four judges from each allied state meaning all of the judges were biased in some respect due to the suffering of each of their nations. The Nuremberg trials did deal with the Nazi legacy in some ways as stated but the bigger legacy was what the Nazis had left behind in Germany within its

How Far Did Relations Between East And West Change During The Cold War Period From 1948 To The 1980s?

1643 words - 7 pages How far did relations between East and West change during the Cold War period from 1948 to the 1980s? The period of 1948 to the 1980s includes a thaw in Cold war relations after 1953, but also covers a series of crises. This essay will discuss how far the period marks a significant change in relations between the two superpowers. To come to my judgment, I will discuss the following, the Berlin Blockade of 1948-9, the Polish Solidarity Crisis