Gun Control…Why Not?
A few months back Obama stated at a mid-day announcement at the White House, "While there is no law or set of laws that can prevent every senseless act of violence completely, no piece of legislation that will prevent every tragedy, every act of evil, if there's even one thing we can do to reduce this violence, if there's even one life that can be saved, then we've got an obligation to try it." I absolutely agree with Obama that we, as Americans, have an obligation to protect our communities and children…what better place to start than placing a greater emphasis on not only gun control but security and mental health awareness as well.
In recent years there has been ...view middle of the document...
After the numerous mass shootings Americans want to see initiative being taken in order to stop these tragedies…well Obamas Gun Control Act is it. Saving one child’s life alone with the acceptance of this act is worth it…so why not?
Of course behind every act there are those who support it and those who don’t. Obama has found support for his Gun Control Act in many powerful people. The mayor of New York, Michael Bloomberg, was one of the first to hop aboard the idea of tweaking the gun control laws and has a large sum backing its development. Senator Dianne Feinstein of California set out to reinstate a law that expired in 2004, which will ban assault rifles. Obama even found support from a powerful Republican, Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah, who will help pass the act, as he has taken on the task of gun control advocates in prior years. The list of prominent supporters for gun control is large but they still face criticism and opposing views from those who don’t support the act.
There are numerous arguments made against Obamas Gun Control Act most of which come from gun owners, and organizations such as Gun Owners of America, National Rifle Association, Second Amendment Foundation…and so on. The main emphasis placed on their counter argument is the desire to make sure them and their families are protected. There support comes from the Second Amendment that grants them the right to bear arms, which is true. The people against gun control feel that Obama’s act is pointless in that there are other forms of, and tools for violence…and this is true. The following sections will inform the reader on what theses anti-gun control act people are over looking in Obama’s plan.
As mentioned before Obama’s plan has 4 steps that will reduce the gun violence uproar but, what is being over looked, is it will also reduce violence in general.
1. Closing background check loopholes to keep guns out of dangerous hands.
It is true that most gun owners carry them legally for hunting, self-defense, or sport shooting but it is to easy for dangerous people to get guns. This step simply strengthens the effort to keep guns out of dangerous hands. Background checks would be required for all gun purchases including private sellers who currently are not required to do so. Currently, there are loopholes (like the one private gun sellers fall into) that still make it easier for dangerous people to purchase guns.
2. Banning military-style assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, and taking other common-sense steps to reduce gun violence.
Assault weapons are instruments of mass violence and such easy access to them needs to be prevented. A survey was conducted in 2010 by the Police Executive Research Forum that found more than one-third of police departments reported a spike in criminal’s using assault weapons and high capacity magazines since 2004 when the law banning these expired. The Gun Control act would also give law enforcement...