This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Functionalist Explanations Of Crime And Deviance

2608 words - 11 pages

Functionalist Explanations of Crime and Deviance

Functionalist’s believe that shared norms and values are the basis of social order and social solidarity. They see crime and deviance as dysfunctional to society. However, functionalist’s do see some crime as being ‘normal’.

Merton took functionalist views further by saying that crime and deviance were a strain between the socially accepted goals of society and the socially approved means of achieving them - this strain then results in deviance. The American Dream states that anyone can make it to the top. However, emphasis is placed on material success so people feel pressure to deviate from accepted norms and values. People are ...view middle of the document...

And also Merton fails to look at crimes of the powerful and over exaggerate working class crimes.

Drawing on Merton’s theory, Nightingale explains how goods are wanted but not through the right way of acquiring them. He studied young black youth in Philadelphia and found that subcultures were emerging as a desire to fit in to mainstream society. Nightingale stated that black children consume US culture through TV with an emphasis on consumerism and violence. These children are excluded economically, racially and politically from mainstream culture and therefore respond to this my identifying themselves with high status names and logos and turning to illegal means to acquire these goods.

Agreeing with Merton that society needs crime to function properly is Durkheim. Durkheim says that crime is necessary for society. He argues that there is a basis of society with shared values that guide our actions called ‘The Collective Conscience’. It has boundaries between actions that are and aren’t acceptable but these boundaries are not clear and they change over time. Durkheim says that whilst too much crime is a threat to society, too little crime and deviance is unhealthy. He sees a certain amount of crime as functional because; It reaffirms boundaries by things such as the media outlining crimes. It also changes values and may cause a change in the law e.g. Cannabis use. And also Social Cohesion which brings people together after a terrible crime has been committed, reminding everybody of the shared norms and values and the limits of toleration.

Alternatively to the functionalist view, the subcultural theory explains crime and deviance as a collective response. It argues that there are subcultures that have different norms and values to the rest of society. They do not live in opposition to mainstream society however they have changed different values to justify criminal behaviour.

Cohen was the first sociologist to develop a subcultural theory of working class crime and deviance. He agreed with Merton that mainstream values of society create problems with success for young people from the working class. He believed that the working class tried to fit in with the middle class by emulating their values and aspirations yet they lacked the means to attain success. They are given little respect as they do badly at school and do not get the qualifications and skills needed to succeed therefore leading to ‘status frustration’ with their low status. They then seek a solution by creating or joining a subculture. Anti-social behaviour is condemned by society but valued by the subculture, relieving the status frustration felt as they gain respect for succeeding in crime and deviance.

Cohen’s theory explained things that Merton’s theory could not, it also uses the collective response that crime and deviance is not individual and is mostly group work. However, there are other explanations to crime and Cohen fails to discuss female crime.

Another...

Other Papers Like Functionalist Explanations of Crime and Deviance

Crime and Deviance Essay

827 words - 4 pages Crime and Deviance “It is normal and a sign of a healthy society when crime exists.” States Heiner. It is evident that crime and deviance play an important role in society today and form the “out of ordinary” actions that take place as a subsequence. Crime is a well-known term to many and is believed to involve a breach of rules or laws implemented by attractions or behaviors that violate social norms, for example someone licking the

Assess Usefulness of Functionalist Approach for Crime

1405 words - 6 pages Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the usefulness of functionalist approaches in explaining crime. (21 marks) In reference to Item A functionalism is a consensus theory, stating that in society we are governed by a value consensus that we all share. This means we all are socialised into the shared values, beliefs and norms of society. Functionalism uses this idea of value consensus to explain how crime is the result of not

Using Material from Item a and Elsewhere, Assess the Usefulness of Functionalist Approach in Explaning Crime

1306 words - 6 pages Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the usefulness of functionalist approaches in explaining crime (21 marks) Deviance is defined as the state of diverging from usual or accepted standards whereas crime is defined as an action or omission which constitutes an offence and is punishable by law. Usually, we would expect that functionalists would regard crime and deviance as wholly negative. However, functionalists such as Durkheim see

Crime And Deviance Is Normal In Society

2836 words - 12 pages Crime and Deviance is Normal in Society Is crime an abnormal act committed by an abnormal person? Most persons confronted with this particular question would undoubtedly say, ¡§Yes¡¨. They would consider themselves, perhaps not angelic, but certainly law-abiding members of society. However, if these, law-abiding citizens were to focus on the question, their answer might be very different. They might discover that the gene of criminality is in

Outline and Assess Sociological Explanations of Gender Difference in Patterns of Crime

2232 words - 9 pages Crime is the when an individual or group commit an act against the law. Deviance is an act that is against the social norm and is labelled as deviant. Official statistics have proven that 80% of all crimes are committed by males. However the study of criminology have tended to be dominated by males, therefore the studies are done by men about men. The official statistics suggest that gender is perhaps the most significant single factor in

Evaluate the Usefulness of Labelling Theory to Our Understanding of Crime and Deviance (40 Marks)

1340 words - 6 pages Evaluate the usefulness of labelling theory to our understanding of crime and deviance (40 marks) Synopticity – Crime & Deviance and Theory Labelling theorists such as Becker and Lemert argue that because of the diversity of different values in society, there can never be a universally agreed definition of what constitutes ‘normal’ or ‘deviant behaviour’. What is deviant for one person may not be deviant for another. Labelling theorists

Assess Strain Theories As An Explanation Of Crime And Deviance In Contemporary Society.Docx Uploaded Successfully

751 words - 4 pages generated by the subculture being justified and leading to antisocial behaviour and crime. Strain is a term used to refer to explanations of criminal behaviour that argue that crime is a result of certain groups of people being places in a position where they are unable for whatever reason to conform to the values and beliefs of society. Strain theory was introduced by Merton who tried to locate deviance within a functionalist framework

Assess the View That Crime and Deviance Are a Product of the Labelling Process

863 words - 4 pages Assess the view that crime and deviance is a product of the labelling process (21) Some sociologists believe that crime and deviance is a result labelling which is when a label is attached to a person or group of people due to their appearance, sex, ethnicity or other factors. It is also leads individuals to believe that labelling theory can create a self-fulfilling prophecy, which is when the person begins to act according to the label and

Assess the Usefulness of Functionalist Approaches in Explaining Crime

993 words - 4 pages Assess the usefulness of functionalist approaches in explaining crime. (21 marks) In this essay one will assess the view of functionalists and how they approach their view of the causes of crime. Functionalisms over all view is to try understand how society shapes us by using a positivist view. Crime is defined as an action which constitutes an offence and is punishable by law. One will

Assess The Usefulness Of Functionalist Approaches In Explaining Crime. (21)

987 words - 4 pages -utilitarian crime as it is a crime committed for ‘fun’, such as vandalism. He believes that the formation of the subcultures release the status frustration by creating their own values for achieving status and therefore deviant behaviour becomes normal and valued within the group. This is useful when looking at explanations of crime as it highlights that crime and deviance is a collective rational response to the norms and values of society

Present An Outline Of Subcultural Theories Of Crime And Deviance And Asses The Values Of These Theories

1852 words - 8 pages hPresent an outline of subcultural theories of crime and deviance and asses the values of these theories. Functionalism is a consensus structuralist theory which sees the source of crime and deviance looted in the structure of the society. Social order is bases on value consensus and social control aims to protect this by controlling the threat posed by crime and deviance. A former functionalist Merton, attempted to explain why deviance

Related Essays

Functionalist Explanations To Crime And Deviance

1655 words - 7 pages Sharna Luscombe Outline and asses the functionalist explanations of crime and deviance. Functionalist ignore deviance; they look at society as a whole and ignore individualism. Functionalism is a structuralist approach (also known as a consensus theory) they believe that individuals are shaped by society and social facts. A limitation of functionalist is that they ignore certain groups within society, such as women and people with

Functionalist Theory Of Crime Essay

1254 words - 6 pages also point out that society will always have deviance within itself because it is bound up with the very conditions of social order. MERTON’S Strain TheoryMerton was critical of traditional functionalist explanations of crime, believing they placed too much emphasis on shared norms and values and ignores the inequalities that exist within society. Merton instead argued that crime was caused by the strains and tensions found within a modern

Crime And Deviance Essay

1123 words - 5 pages Evaluate Marxist explanations of Crime and Deviance Labelling theory paved the way in understanding how deviance was something defined by social processes. In this way social agencies such as the police defined what was deviant. Marxists took this view even further by examining the power of certain social groups to define deviance and create the laws which secured social conformity. Marxists see crime and deviance as not coming from moral or

Crime And Deviance Essay

3404 words - 14 pages the law more frequently (Adler) * You can also look at the relationship between crime and masculinity if you have enough time – why are men more likely to commit crime? The work of Messerschmidt and Winlow is important here. | Assess sociological explanations of the variations in crime and deviance in different localities. | This question is asking you to explain and evaluate the theories that argue that different localities have different