This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Fuji And Kodak Essay

2269 words - 10 pages

Abstract
Eastman Kodak Company and Fujifilm are competing corporations in the photography supply and equipment industry. When the industry changed both companies were impacted, but due to very unique management styles and ability to adapt to change one Fujifilm excelled while Kodak faltered and eventually declared Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in 2012.
History of Kodak
George Eastman founded Kodak, in 1888. The company’s early success was based on the new technology for cameras. The camera simplified the photo taking process (Williams, C. 2013) Kodak’s main focus was photography and imaging. They had an array of products that ranged from photography equipment, film, paper and color chemicals. In ...view middle of the document...

Popularity for Fujifilm grew at an enormous rate. They were in second place in the United States in film usage. Eventually, they began selling globally. Fujifilm made bold moves in American market. They used aggressive marketing and lower prices for their product. The 1984 Los Angeles Olympics marked the turning point of the Fujifilm’s success in this venture, when they became the official film of the event. This placed Fujifilm on the market permanently. The company began taking over Kodak’s market share by offering equal quality products for a lower price (Tsurumi, Y 1999). As Fujifilm prepared for the fast changing needs in the market, it widened its business scope to digital cameras, printers, photocopiers, and optical devices. It also tapped into the health sector, producing medical equipment that includes X-ray imaging and chemicals. In January 1934(Tsurumi, Y 1999). In February 1934 the Ashigara Factory began operation producing photographic film, print paper, dry plates and other photosensitive materials (Tsurumi, Y 1999). With reported revenue of 917.4 billion Yen ($9.8 billion,) today Fujifilm is the world’s largest photographic and imaging company. Manufacturing Digital cameras, 3D Image products, binoculars, supplies and a multitude of products and services to various businesses Fujifilm has established itself in several markets within the U.S. and other countries (Tsurumi, Y 1999).
Compare and Contrast Kodak and Fuji Film
Kodak’s failure to embrace innovation in a timely fashion could be blamed on its management’s approach. They seemed to “rule” from behind the desk from their Rochester headquarters, which made them ignorant about the coming changes in technology and customers’ needs, and how it would affect them. Even when they were advised that the move to digital technology was necessary, management still refused to take action. In fact, avoiding revolutionizing the technology they originally created is the main reason behind Kodak’s current troubles and loss of share in the market (Snyder, 2013). Although they created the first ever digital camera back in 1975, top-level management rejected the idea in fear of losing its core business in film. Looking back, this seems to be the turning point in the company’s fortune (Tsurumi, Y 1999). The predicted change to digital technology 20 years later was seen as the far future, and as the company enjoyed success, leadership did not see a reason for change.
Kodak was at a downfall because of complacency and not changing with the market. For decades Kodak’s sales and profits climbed. Management had the easy job of simply refining existing products rather than creating new ones. Many business owners did not adopt and change their way of thinking for their own companies. Small business with its lean and management style could easily be lured into unrelated industries. Most cases this will not only result in failure, and also have a negative impact on its core and products and...

Other Papers Like Fuji and Kodak

Case On Marketin Essay

1587 words - 7 pages , consumers began to flock to digital cameras, and cell phone manufacturers beganto offer camera phones. As if all that were n¶t enough, Fuji was slowly but surely exposing the cracks in Kodak¶s marketing strategy. This was especially true of the move toward one-hour photo processing. In early 2003, the company began a major reevaluation of corporate strategy. In the years following, Kodak reduced its dependence on traditional photography. The new

Eastman Kodak: Competing In Mature Markets

3153 words - 13 pages of pride, the typical user has less sensitivity and is more forth coming in buying and demanding foreign products.Second, consumers have found a competitor to Kodak in the name of Fuji. Clearly, Fuji has emerged from a minor player in the early 1980's to take a solid number two position within the US especially when no major differences in the quality of film could position Kodak away from its competitors.Third, the landscape within retail

Kodak and Fujifilm

2112 words - 9 pages unable to adapt to change and eventually it hurt them. Fujifilm unlike Kodak has been able to transform itself from a fairly narrow photographic supplies into a diversified company with significant health care and electronics operations. Fuji expanded from its original product and used its chemical expertise to produce drugs, liquid-crystal display panels, and also cosmetics. Transitioning into new fields was neither easy nor cheap for Fujifilm, but

IMC

1382 words - 6 pages having a superior product and supplying the product on a global scale Kodak was able to be the king of the mountain in terms of film sales. "In the very early years of the company, Eastman was devoted to the idea of supplying the tools of photography at the lowest possible price to the greatest number of people" (www.kodak.com). It was not until the mid 1960's when Fuji opened their first shop in the Empire State building that Kodak had any

Business 599 Assignment 3

2131 words - 9 pages necessary to sustain its target annual revenue. Lowering the cost of production is a critical objective of the company. From the case study, it is apparent that other companies such as Fuji of Japan have been able to maintain lower prices for their products. Therefore, Kodak had to identify ways to cut its cost of production to avoid being pushed out of the market. Kodak had a strong brand and image, which carried them over the years

Kodak

1945 words - 8 pages Fisher’s era Kodak’s market shares passed from more than 50% to less than 40% and Fuji passed from 20% to 30% market shares. Kodak seemed to have developed the personality of an “old man”. Hence. in almost any retail store. one of the most important mistake of Fisher was not understand how depth of the razorblade culture and how Kodak was stuck in its routines. Unfortunately. and that it may not be possible to change one level without changing

Stories of Change

1577 words - 7 pages business of the CEO - Carly Fiorina – with limited contribution from the rest of the top management. This perception led to mistrust between employees of the former HP and those of the former Compaq. At Kodak, the company remained complacent glorifying itself in the successes of preceding years while competitors such as Fuji kept abreast with new innovation in the digital revolution (Kotter, 2012). Another error characteristic of change in

Strategic Profile of Polaroid

1045 words - 5 pages environment. Both the photography and the film industry has gone almost exclusively digital and the competition is divided between Kodak, Fuji, Sony, Casio, and others who have then entered the market. At the same time, there aren’t many real substitutes both for digital cameras and photography. The market for the traditional photography is shrinking, while the market for digital photography starts to grow and so does the competition. That’s why Polaroid

Econ4400 Term Paper1

880 words - 4 pages To: Kelly Johnston, CEO KODAK From: Ji Xia, Human Resources Assistant In Reference to:  Things changed dramatically in 1980s. The technology boom shocked our film production industry a lot. Many new market competitors, such as Fuji, have lunched many new products. Our market power and market value was deeply weakened by these new competitors and their new products. The failure of power-decentralized plan and MAPP also proofed that we have

Book Summary

1623 words - 7 pages competitor is similar to creating a pointillist painting, the goal is not to create the perfect picture but a picture that is representative of reality • Intelligence is (1) using information efficiently (2) about making critical decisions (3) the art of applying imperfect knowledge • Example of risk versus certainty: The battle between Fuji and Kodak (1) Kodak: denied the changing reality and delayed taking action; wanted less risk and

Mammography

1384 words - 6 pages for Danish radiologists. The UWHC uses digital film for mammography - the machine does an initial reading and the specialist does the second. In Denmark, they have a double-blind check with Kodak RIS where two doctors of unknown qualifications check the film. Quantitative: • Comparison of the breast cancer mortality rates in each age group between the countries the change in tumor detection before and after implementation. • The number of

Related Essays

Kodak Vs Fujifilm Essay

1933 words - 8 pages millions on digital photos, and it paid off. It was this conceited and 2654complacency that stopped Kodak from altering with the market different Fuji who decided to compress every fall of earnings out of the film industry, but invest in the future; Kodak sensed they had the flawless merchandise and refused to change with the time, so there is no wonder Kodak fell into the pit. (Gordon, 2012) (The Economist, 2012). When Film was monarch both

Kodak Versus Fujifilm Essay

1731 words - 7 pages core business and growth businesses are: retail systems solutions, document scanners, and digital plates. The growth businesses are: consumer inkjet, digital printing solutions, enterprise workflow software and services and packaging solutions. Initially, Fuji was the second-largest maker of photographic film in the world, trailing only Eastman Kodak, but leading in Japan. Fuji established its reputation in the domestic market. Buyers were not

Kodand Fujifilm Essay

1703 words - 7 pages open communication thrives on team work, and has individual and organizational accountability. Compare and contrast the approach to management that each company has pursued in order to embrace innovation. Kodak and Fujifilm both knew that the digital age was approaching quickly. Fujifilm CEO Shigetaka Komori said in an interview “the question was, what to do about it.” Fuji went further than just moving from digital to analog. The

Case Study Codac

1226 words - 5 pages evaluating the performance of each department and employees. Such evaluation system is dependent on how an employee’s productivity contributed to the achievement of organizational goals. Case Study: Eastman Kodak 1. The different factors that motivated Kodak to change its organizational architecture are: A. stiff competition. For many years, Eastman Kodak had control on the film production industry. The firm had managed to time the release of