This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Forms Of Utilitarianism Essay

956 words - 4 pages

Shaw and Barry distinguish two different forms of utilitarianism. What are these two forms? Briefly describe each.
The first form of utilitarianism was a view by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. They viewed utilitarianism as that a person’s actions are right if they create the most pleasure, and wrong if they do not. Both men believed that pleasure and happiness were equal and considered it the ultimate value. They thought of utilitarianism as self-interest. An understanding of this is that if someone gets pleasure out of something or it makes them happy then it is okay for them to do something. For example, if someone gets pleasure out of driving much faster than the speed limit, ...view middle of the document...

What are these three basic principles?
The first of Nozicks principles is, A person who acquires a holding in accordance with the principle of justice in acquisition is entitled to that holding. If someone gains something legally and it doesn’t affect someone else, then they have the right to what they gain. If someone was to plant a vegetable garden in their back yard that did not affect anyone else, then they are entitled to what comes out of that garden.
The second of Nozicks principles is, A person who acquires a holding in accordance with the principle of justice in transfer, from someone else entitled to the holding, is entitled to the holding. If the person that planted the garden decides to give away some of the vegetables to their neighbor, then the neighbor is entitled to the vegetables that were given to them.
The third of Nozicks principles is, No one is entitled to a holding except by (repeated) applications of 1 and 2. If someone was to go to the vegetable garden and take from it as they pleased without the permission of the person who is already entitled to it, then they are not entitled to anything in the garden.
Two main features of John Rawls's theory of distributive justice are particularly important. What are these two features? Describe them.
The first feature of Rawl’s theory of distributive justice is the hypothetical-contract approach. This feature of Rawl’s theory states that people in a society should come together to determine the ground rules for their society, specifically, government. He believes that instead of their society being built off of or reconstructed from what may have been in the past, that people should start from the ground up and build their society from the start to the end.
The second feature of Rawl’s theory of...

Other Papers Like Forms Of Utilitarianism

Business Ethics Essay

819 words - 4 pages 1. Shaw and Barry distinguish two different forms of utilitarianism. What are these two forms? Briefly describe each and use examples. The two forms of utilitarianism are act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism states we must ask ourselves what the consequences of a particular act in a particular situation will be for all those affected. If its consequences bring more net good than those of any alternative course of

Moral Luxuries Essay

1277 words - 6 pages are right insofar as they promote happiness and wrong insofar as they produce the reverse of happiness. The utilitarianism that Mill is known for is broken into two separate forms. The first is act-utilitarianism; this view says that the particular consequences of each individual action is evaluated by reference to the principle of utility. The second is rule-utilitarianism; this view says that rules are established by reference to the principle

Organizational Behavior

872 words - 4 pages Business Ethics M2 Written Assignment 1. Shaw and Barry distinguish two different forms of utilitarianism. What are these two forms? Briefly describe each and use examples. Shaw and Barry distinguished two different forms of utilitarianism, Act Utilitarianism and Rule Utilitarianism. To understand Utilitarianism in depth we must understand what Utilitarianism means first. “Utilitarianism is the moral doctrine that we should always act to

Business Ethics

823 words - 4 pages 1. Shaw and Barry distinguish two forms of utilitarianism. What are these two forms? Briefly describe each and use examples. There are two types of utilitarianism, act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is a theory which states an act is morally right if it benefits the greatest number of people; this theory is based on the act itself and accounts for the happiness (benefit) of the majority (even if others are

Commerce Essay

1594 words - 7 pages INTRODUCTION The link between Utilitarianism Theory and the James Hardie Industries – ‘asbestos’ case has helped me to develop a deeper understanding of the difficult ethical questions asked in business and how corporations respond to those questions using moral philosophies. From the time when the short summary written in regards to the meaning and importance of the term ’responsible business’ in week 2, till today, I have explored various

Shaw and Barry

1357 words - 6 pages Barry distinguish two different forms of utilitarianism. These two forms are act utilitarianism, which is the classic and most straight forward version of utilitarianism. We have one and only one moral obligation, the maximization of happiness for everyone concerned, and every action is to be judged according to how well it lives up to this standard. (Shaw & Barry, 2013) It brings the greatest amount of happiness in a particular situation

Ethics Essay

572 words - 3 pages Society impacts the ethical views a person begins to create in today’s world. For instance, lying, today is still considered a morally wrong action to utilize however; a “little white lie” has never hurt anyone or so it is said. These contemplating views express different forms of actually claiming an action as morally and virtuously wrong. Deontological theories, utilitarianism, and the virtue theory share the quality of viewing a common action

Corporata Responsibility

889 words - 4 pages student does not yet know the origins and nature of virtue, ethics, and morals, then the student must accept the teacher's teachings to be true, and the student will still be following an external rule little different than if the student were following a social law or custom. Utilitarianism is one of the most powerful and persuasive approaches to normative ethics in the history of philosophy. Though not fully articulated until the 19th

Utilitarian Ethics

2313 words - 10 pages done for the greater good, this should be portrayed in the end result. The end result forms the beneficial aspect that is achieved as happiness for an individual. The utilitarianism theory by mill is based on principle of actions that are right. However, focusing on the utilitarianism as an issue in the decision makers in China, is not the step forward. Happiness is personal and cannot be forced on an individual. The use of utilitarianism as

Products Liability Research Paper: Brazilian Blowout

1694 words - 7 pages Chemistry Society noted that formaldehyde content-in both gaseous and aqueous forms-should be accounted for when measuring the formaldehyde content of a product. In September of 2010 Oregon's OSHA received complaints from various hair stylists in a salon of difficulty breathing, nose bleeds and eye irritation who all claimed to have used one such hair treatment, Brazilian Blowout. Oregon OSHA conducted air sampling in salons during this tproduct's

Kant and Utiliarianism on Sweatshops

1490 words - 6 pages countries would have a harsh affect on the lives of citizens overseas. These once factory employed people would have to return to other harsher forms of “jobs” such as prostitution. From this angle a utilitarianism would argue that these sweatshops are in fact creating a stipend of human happiness in these countries and preventing them from certain forms of suffering. However, when it comes to the horrible working conditions and low wages of

Related Essays

Utilitarianism Essay

1347 words - 6 pages ‘Explain how Preference Utilitarianism differs from previous forms of Utilitarianism’ (AO1 30 marks) Preference Utilitarianism is a modern adaptation of the traditional forms of Utilitarianism; it focuses on determining whether an action is morally right or wrong according to how they fit with the preferences with those involved. Preference Utilitarianism differs from other forms of utilitarianism because it is solely on the individual

Utilitarianism Essay

1084 words - 5 pages potential of a community and it's clear that both forms favour the community over individuals in their decision making process. This is met with much criticism, since it means a small minority can be domineered by a majority and allow terrible acts to be justified: gang rape, gang murder can be justified under Act Utilitarianism but not Rule Utilitarianism which prioritises 'higher' pleasures and would not allow sadistic pleasure to overrule terror

Jeremy Bentham Essay

578 words - 3 pages consequences. (DeGeorge 44-46) There are many different forms or views of utilitarianism that are used to calculate consequences. One of these views is hedonistic utilitarianism; the basis of this form is pleasure and pain. This form of calculation reduces actions to whether they cause pleasure or pain (the absence of pleasure). For example, doing a dangerous job to earn extra money, extra money can lead pleasure. If an injury occurred while doing this

'evaluating Utilitarianism' What Are The Main Features Of Utilitarianism As An Ethical Theory? Examine And Consider Criticisms That Have Been Made Against Utilitarianism

2266 words - 10 pages Calculus allows contemplation over an action dependent on its consequences.The theory of Utilitarianism is recognised as a universal theory, meaning that it can be applied to literally every situation. It addition to this, Utilitarianism is egalitarian, meaning that it does not consider one person's definition of pleasure to be of a higher state than another, in other words, it accepts all forms of pleasure to be of an equal status.Although Mill upheld