Euthanasia - Deep sympathy for the suffering
Euthanasia is the deliberate killing either by omission or commission of a dependent person for their benefit. Arguments against euthanasia claim that the concern for happiness and human life and not their obliteration is the objective of any good governance. They say that the terminally ill are people who require protection from social, economic and family pressures, and who are particularly prone to this pressure as a result of chronic depression, pain and effects of continued medication. Arguments for euthanasia say it is impossible to maintain quality of life if a patient is dead.
While there have been ...view middle of the document...
3, (12), 224-331.
Here, the author discusses the role of Euthanasia as a license for a medical professional to end life and how this law may be the biggest threat to the patient. He further goes to explore the ingredients of the law to legalize euthanasia in order to safeguard the patient. He examines the traditional perspective in order to suggest legal aspects that could allow a patient’s life to end with dignity.
Emanuel, Ezekiel, J., (1999). What is the Great Benefit of Legalizing Euthanasia of Physician-Assisted Suicide?: Ethics. 109, (3), 629-642.
The author explores the role of euthanasia putting quality in a dying experience. He explores that ethical decision in legalization which forms that a large part of the euthanasia debate. He addresses the pros and cons that require close evaluation in order to make a legal decision on euthanasia.
Garrard, E., & Wilkinson, S., (2005). Passive Euthanasia: J. Med. Ethic.31 - 64-68. doi:10.1136/jme.2003.005777
In discussing passive euthanasia, the author discussed the distinction between passive and active euthanasia which is very, vital in medical ethics. The paper seeks to dispel the nervousness experienced by medical practitioners regarding euthanasia and understanding the reasons for withholding or withdrawing life prolonging treatments as opposed to other reasons.
Euthanasia endorses a quiet and relatively easy death to show mercy on one who is already brain dead and is a well preferred option for most medical practitioners. Many medical practitioners support Euthanasia but are too afraid to practice it because of its legal implications. Legalizing euthanasia means that the doctor can now administer their professional services to the patients and the relatives in accordance with professional and moral obligations. When a person cannot make their own decisions, they need someone to make them, and because this must be done in the legal context, legalizing euthanasia enables medical practitioners to make ethical decisions without fear of prosecution. Legalizing Euthanasia invokes the concepts of futility to enhance the process of best practices in providing medical care to avoid inappropriate care. These invocations can be used successfully to make appropriate considerations on chances of success, life expectancy, cost and quality of life.
While survival is crucial to the dying and their families, in some conditions, it may be impossible, unbearable and painful, making living a curse or an abuse. Euthanasia involves allowing a person who would otherwise suffer more in life than in death. The ingredients that permit euthanasia need to become the focus, more than whether it should be legalized or not. Legalizing euthanasia gives doctors power to make moral decisions of man and is the reason why there is so much debate. Euthanasia would serve to free an individual from pain but the point where a doctor can arguably debate when to...