I think that Erik Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development has its strong points and its weak points.
The theory is obviously one of the most studied theories when it comes to developmental stages, and I think it is the most specific. By providing those who use the theory with eight different stages that occur in ones life (as opposed to only five in Freud’s psychosexual stages and five in Piaget’s cognitive stages) it really pinpoints how much we as people progress in just a span of a few short years. Erikson was able to give a more time frames with fewer years in between than the aforementioned theories which, in my opinion, makes it more precise and accurate.
After working with children in a preschool, I take notice of what exactly each individual stage means, and I realize that Erikson appears to be right on target for the most part. All of the youngest ones do have a ...view middle of the document...
It just doesn’t really happen like that. It takes time, and for some it takes more than a couple of years to adapt to something that is so important.
On April 2nd, 2007 we spoke about the different things that occur in adolescence that are considered psychosocial aspects, and I was very intrigued by our class discussion. I felt the class had a lot of interesting ideas when it came to growing up and maturing.
One major topic we discussed that day was identity formation. I enjoyed talking about this subject because I just saw a lot of people go through it in high school and it is very easy for me to understand how some people form their identity based on other people, and how some people form it based on their own experiences, but however it forms, the discussion made me realize that it is a huge step in a young person’s life. Essentially, it makes the adolescent who they are.
During this class we also talked about how high schools nowadays are trying to get students to decide on what major they want when they go to college. I think trying to decide something so important in high school is ridiculous. Even college students tend to change their majors a few times throughout their schooling. I understand where the idea is coming from, and I think that high schoolers should put some thought into what they want to be when they are completely finished in school, but forcing them to decide as fourteen and fifteen year olds is unfair.
We finished class by talking about the 7 types of dating as proposed by Roscoe in 1987. It was nice to end the discussion with this because it was funny to hear what everyone else had to say in response to the different reasons why we apparently pick a person to date. Personally, I was surprised that there were 7 types of dating, until we discussed them all. I actually think that the all 7 of the types of dating are right on target. People do tend to pick someone who will help boost their social status, or go out with someone purely for recreation.