Employers Liability Essay

2842 words - 12 pages

Law of Tort
Employers Liability


A company owes obligations to a variety of persons affected by the way in which their business is conducted. For example if a business is involved in the manufacture and distribution of materials, then duties related to dangerous products will be applicable; or if a business is involved in providing a professional service, then professional negligence principles will apply. The same kinds of principles are also relevant to the considerable body of law that is concerned with employer’s liability. Employer’s liability deals with the responsibilities of employers for torts or occupational injuries suffered by employees arising from an ...view middle of the document...

Employer’s Standard of Care

An Employer must take reasonable steps to ensure the safety of their employees. The same standard of care to be expected is that under the principles of negligence, generally, the standard is not one that is absolute but one of reasonable care. This can be clearly seen in the case of Bradley v CIE[3] where it was stated by Henchy J. that, “The law does not require an employer to ensure in all circumstances the safety of his workmen. He will discharged his duty if he done what a reasonable and prudent employer would have done in the circumstances.”
When bringing a case to court an employee must show not only that they have suffered damages, but that the damages could have been prevented if the employer had taken reasonable care in protection of their health and safety. It is not enough to merely show the existence of an injury, the plaintiff must show that the injury was foreseeable by defendant and that they had failed to act in a reasonable way. Brady v Beckmann[4] illustrates this. The plaintiff was an employee of the defendants and developed dermatitis as a result of fumes inhaled at his workplace. Evidence showed that the plants work environment was superior to that of others and the court found the
likelihood of the disease was “so unique and improbable as not to be one which could be said to have been reasonably foreseeable by his employers at the time of his employment.” therefore no liability was imposed.
The standard of care that is delivered for the safety of the employees can be divided, and looked at in four aspects: the place of work, system, equipment and the ability of staff. While there is an element of overlap among these it is a useful way to view and analyse the topic.
•Place of Work: A safe place to work must be provided by the employer for his/her employees. This obligation is concerned with the physical environment the employees find themselves in for example offices, floors, air, lighting conditions etc. In Gallagher v Mogul of Ireland Ltd [5] for example, the roof of a mine collapsed due to inadequate provisions taking by the employer to support it. This obligation is not restricted to the places directly under the control of the employer, it can also extend to places where an employee is required to go and work. The appropriate example is Dunne v Honeywell Control Systems Ltd & Virginia Milk products Ltd [6], here the plaintiff was employed as an electrical technician by the first defendant, Honeywell Ltd. He got injured in a fall when coming down a ladder on the second defendant’s premises. Both defendants were said to be at fault because one; the standards of the ladder provided were not adequate, and two; the plaintiff had to carry a heavy tool box up and down it in order to work and was not warned of the dangers of doing so. It was held by Barron J that an employer should inspect places where his/her employees will be working on a regular basis, with respect to the...

Other Papers Like Employers Liability

Compensation Culture and Tort Reform Essay

2516 words - 11 pages personal injury claims as ‘all compensators must provide prompt notification to CRU of any claim for personal injury made against them.’ It is misleading to talk about general trends in our propensity to claim because different types of claim have followed different trends. Thus it is necessary to look at employers’ liability, clinical negligence, public liability and road traffic accident claims separately to examine the

Respondeat Superior Essay

1023 words - 5 pages . The doctrine will be defined and court cases discussed concerning how the doctrine was applied in each case. The cases will be analyzed concerning how the doctrine was applied and who benefited in each case. The concept of the employer being held responsible for their employees’ actions has created additional liability issues in the workplace. The term “respondeat superior (let the master respond), is a legal doctrine holding employers liable

Xmg 216 Employee Monitoring

920 words - 4 pages with loss of production hours, harassment charges from the display of graphic or obscene material, as well as trademark infringements form improper use of logos and trademarks owned by an outside party. Employers must also be concerned about potential liability arising from employees’ misuse of company e-mail, compromising a company virtue and moral perceptions. Employers are also concerned with concerned with e-mails inappropriate material

Business Laws

1121 words - 5 pages want to establish. Sole proprietorship, is a form of business with the least amount of legal formalities and the owner assumes sole responsibility for finances and operations of the business. “C” Corporation, are separate entity from its owners. Providing shareholders protection from liability and debts. “S” Corporation, similar to a corporation and is exempt from federal income tax. General Partnership, require an agreement between

Criminal Law

2846 words - 12 pages Doctrine of vicarious liability The doctrine of vicarious liability generally operates within the law of torts. It has become well-established in English law and historically has been called “Master and Servant liability,” which clearly indicates the circumstances in which the doctrine becomes applicable in tort law. The general rule in tort law is that a person who authorises a tort will personally be liable for damage or harm as a result

Common Law

3258 words - 14 pages liability with reference to vicarious liability and health and safety implications taking Mr. Bobs Company as an example The employers duty of care is to take responsibility for the safety of employees during there employment. There is also a tort of statutory liability where by it talks about the industry safety regulations. Employers must provide competent staff adequate materials, a proper system and effective supervision. From the scenario we

Problems with Ppaca

1409 words - 6 pages compensation from a business will be required to receive a 1099 from that business at the end of the year. This ruling has been predicted to be so burdensome to American small businesses that even Obama has vowed to sign legislation to repeal it. Currently, the bill is gridlocked in Congress. Under the PPAC, the employer mandate will allow employers to receive monthly reports on subsidized employees. This has potential liability implications

Workplace Privacy

1763 words - 8 pages Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA) made it illegal to intercept, disclose or electronic eavesdropping. The ECPA also allows employers to listen to conversations made in the ordinary course of business. However, where business interest such as a legal liability is at stake, the surveillance would be allowed. Herman chooses the electronic surveillance to include listening in on the sales person’s conversation with the potential buyer. Under the


1148 words - 5 pages Fine Foods is using a family relationship to process its legal issues, luckily the company did not face any serious legal issue with its customers or employees, but now days as the company has grown, it should hire e legal counselor that can take a look and analyze all the legal operations with a focus on issues of product liability. Product liability refers to a manufacturer or seller being held liable for placing a defective product into the

Landscapes Plus

1164 words - 5 pages their decisions, as the liability of discrimination will likely increase. Protected Class Designations Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees from discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The consideration of these “protected class” designations should not be used as a basis for letting employees go during a RIF. In addition to discriminating in regard to discharge, employers also can not

Legal Forms of Business

2431 words - 10 pages them, along with scenarios that each of these seven forms would be preferred. The forms of business being discussed in this paper will be: sole proprietorship, general partnership, limited liability partnership, Limited Liability Company, S corporation, franchise, and corporate form. Sole Proprietorship A sole proprietorship is a business that is owned by one person. Someone new to the business world would want to start out having this type

Related Essays

Differentiate The Doctrine Of Strict Liability From The Doctrine Of Absolute Liability

610 words - 3 pages & Buchholtz, 2006, pp. 422-423). Based on the cases set forth by Carroll & Buchholtz (2006, p. 422), precedent seems to indicate that shared liability throughout a products value-chain is less well-defined for absolute liability than for strict liability. All of the cases presented for this doctrine involve either manufacturers themselves or those directly responsible for exposure, like employers – this is largely a function of the doctrine chosen as

Cyber Liability Essay

517 words - 3 pages . However, this could not apply to the employer when he required the employee to do something illegal.(Queensland Law Reform Commission, December 2001) Cyber-liability What has changed nowadays is the notion of cyber-liability. Cyber liability addresses the first and third party associated with e-business, the Internet, networks and informational assets. The employers could be held liable for the actions of their employees in their internet

Commercial Law Essay

1484 words - 6 pages for discrimination and harassment which occurs in the workplace or in connection with a person’s employment unless it can be shown that ‘all reasonable steps’ have been taken to reduce this liability. This legal responsibility is called ‘vicarious liability’. Many employers are unaware that they can be liable for a range of actions committed by their employees in the course of their employment - these can include bullying and harassment, violent

Work Related Injuries Essay

653 words - 3 pages Workers' Compensation Office and the insurance carrier, also within a certain period of time (pg 408 Valerius, Bayes, Newby, Blockwiak). Employers pay for the insurance which supplies medical care coverage and cash compensation to those injured and unable to perform the job task due to a work related injury. With the workers' compensation laws all workers are covered and each individual that is connected has their own liability to guarantee the