In this paper, I will analyze a video that addressed the issues of electronic surveillance of employees. I will explain if workers can reasonably get privacy in the workplace, the difference between an open and enclosed office area, if Herman’s need for electronic surveillance is a sufficient reason, how an employee can engage in electronic surveillance, and finally explain to what extent the inclusion of innocent, unaware third parties in such surveillance is legal. In the conclusion I will explain how important these five questions are, why it is important to understand these questions and finally how it is important to understand and answer the questions so we can be clear about ...view middle of the document...
The only place they may get privacy is in the restroom or out in their vehicles. Some restaurants have privacy restroom and this will work in some places. In a corporate setting, employees may have a small break room they can go to on their lunch break or a private restroom to make personal calls.
Explain whether it makes a difference if an employee is in an open area or in an enclosed office.
Enclosed office is more relaxing and can make an employee enjoy coming to work because of their peaceful environment .Also, an enclosed office has more privacy. Employees have the choice to open or close their door. There is less distraction from other employees and more work being accomplished. On the other hand, an open area in the workplace has no privacy at all. It is very distracting and sometimes irritating. The conversation of other co-workers may not always be business related. Shelly hears everything that Tony is saying to Ms. Drummand because they are both in an open area. Working with some employees is hard itself and putting more than two employees in an open area can cause a lot of problems. Some employees like a quite environment, while others may like to work listening to music. Other employees are hot and others may be cold. There are a lot of personalities, likes and dislike that each employee has to respect in order to work in an open area. Many employees like to know what type of environment they will be working in before they accept a job.
Explain if Herman’s need to know whether his salespersons are honest is a sufficient ground for utilizing electronic surveillance.
Herman does not have a sufficient ground to listen to his employees. Herman is a manager at a car dealership and salespersons are not always honest. In the video, Electronic Surveillance, Herman secretly listens to his employee conversations and a state, “monitoring my sales floor” is how he sees it ( 2008). Herman is justifying why he utilizes electronic surveillance to another employee in the video. Electronic Surveillances are used in a lot of companies today. According to the book, “92 percent of employers were conducting some form of electronic monitoring of their employees” (Halbert & Ingulli, 2010, 73). This type of observation has become popular in the workplace and employers want to know if their employees are really working. If Herman used his electronic surveillance to monitor the inventory it would be a legitimate reason to utilize the electronic surveillance. The Electronic Communications Privacy Act 1986 (ECPA) states, “it is illegal to intercept, disclose, or access messages without authorization, would appear to protect workers from electronic eavesdropping” (Halbert & Ingulli, 2010, 74). This applies to most jobs but there are a few that are exempt from this. “For example, there is no protection for communications that are “readily accessible to the general public” (Halbert & Ingulli, 2010 74). In Herman’s case, he will not be breaking any...