Egoism And Utilitarianism Essay

1168 words - 5 pages

To Treat or Not To Treat

To treat or not to treat, that is the question? What would you do? How does the subject of cancer treatment apply to the moral theories of Egoism and Utilitarianism? Which theory best addresses this problem? I would assert Egoism best handles the dilemmas undressed by this ethical scenario.
Egoism is a normative ethical theory that contends we act morally when in any given situation the right thing to do will be whatever maximally promotes long term self-interest. It does not describe how people behave; rather, it describes how people "ought" to behave. (Class notes February 23) This is a key element of all normative theories. Another key element of egoism ...view middle of the document...

English philosophers John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) and Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) were the leading proponents of what is now called Utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham was a British reformer who believed the human experience can be summed up through either pleasure or pain. He defines the “Principle of Utility” as such; we ought to act only in ways that promote the long term happiness of everyone affected (or minimize the long term suffering). John Stuart Mill holds happiness to be not just quantitative; it’s also a matter of quality. (Class notes March 15) One of his most famous quotes states, “Pleasure and freedom from pain, are the only things desirable as ends.”
Utilitarians are social reformers that support suffrage for women and those without property, and the abolition of slavery. They also argue that criminals ought to be reformed and not merely punished (although Mill did support capital punishment as a deterrent). Bentham spoke out against cruelty to animals. Mill was a strong supporter of meritocracy. Essentially, they believed that everyone’s happiness counts equally.
Imagine that you or a loved one were in the hospital suffering from a terminal illness, let’s say breast cancer, and the pain is so unbearable that the subject of continued treatment comes up. You want what is best for your loved one but the family is on the other end fighting as well, they want to discontinue treatment in which the patient's disease is allowed to run its natural course. And you seeing how much your love one wants to fight until the bitter end, no matter the cost. I again ask what you would do. Treat or not treat?
Both you and the family wants what is best for the sick loved one but only one decision can be made and allowed. Simply stated, an ethical egoist would say the loved one “ought” to determine what is in their “own” long term self-interest. Therefore, if it is their desire to continue treatment then so be it. To suffer unbearable pain is not enough of a deterrent when considering “long term” as a possibility. The loved one determines the definition of “quality” life and according to them the ability to live in pain outweighs the desire to end life to avoid prolonged suffering. To deny their wishes would deny their rights as an individual, and philosopher Ayn Rand contends, to deny the value of individualism is destructive.
Utilitarianism on the other hand, equates happiness with pleasure and...

Other Papers Like Egoism and Utilitarianism

The Sole Supplier Essay

985 words - 4 pages company will set up stricter rules of quality control. In order to reduce the chance of product failure, our company will pay more attention to the last procedure before the products get off the production line. Relevant Issues: Moral Issues: Will our company supply or not? Applying the theory of Egoism and Utilitarianism, continuing to supply will result in more risks, increasing the dissatisfactions of our shareholders. Also, does our

Business Ethics Essay

327 words - 2 pages Assignment 2 1. Suppose that you had been one of the MBA Applicants who stumbled across an opportunity to learn your results early. What you have done, and why? Would you have considered it is a moral decision? If so, on what basis would you have made it? 2. Assess the morality of what the curious applicants did from the point of view of egoism, utilitarianism, Kant’s ethics, Ross’s pluralism, and rule utilitarianism. 3. In you

Individual Research Paper

1842 words - 8 pages Running head: ACCOUNTING ETHICS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEONTOLOGY AND UTILITARIANISM Accounting Ethics: Differences between Deontology and Utilitarianism Yaa Mendez Liberty University Outline: Introduction with thesis Deontology: definition, concepts Utilitarianism: definition, concepts Similarities between deontology and utilitarianism Difference between deontology and utilitarianism Conclusion In 2013, the

Business Ethics and Moral Philosophy

1297 words - 6 pages superior wants you to carry out some responsibility, and your workgroup thinks this is unfair? What if some personal role conflicts with a work role? (Others roles include: student, parent, child, organization member, etc.) Moral Philosophy Perspectives 1. Teleology — egoism - enlightened egoism - utilitarianism 2. Deontology 3. Relativist Perspective 4. Virtue Ethics I. Teleology — consequences

Law, Ethics and Sustainability

3707 words - 15 pages help make a final decision as to what is the best solution to this problem. I will be using ethical egoism, utilitarianism and ethics of right and justice. Ethical Egoism Ethical egoism – act in the best interest of yourself, provided you act within the law of the land. "By the grace of reality and the nature of life, man -- every man -- is an end in himself, he exists for his own sake, and the achievement of his own happiness is his

Business Ethics

547 words - 3 pages . Universalism is a concept that is easy to grasp and makes sense in that people uphold common values like honesty, rules against murder, deceit, torture, or oppression as Brasfield has stated. I believe it is far too often that we see egoism in most organizations. Egoism states that self-interest is acceptable. Maximizing the benefit of the individual over the entire organization. Utilitarianism seeks the greatest good for the greatest number of

Ethic Chapter3

567 words - 3 pages company. Unlike Alcoa, the message form management of Amgen is to manage earnings, do whatever it takes to gain business, protect our product even if patients are hurt. Amgen fired the two whistleblower, O’Brien and Westmoreland, rather than report problems to the FDA or to lose sales to a rival company. Amgen acted out of egoism. It might rationalize the action using utilitarianism with the greatest good being profit to Amgen and the means

If Fred Were a Deontologist (Kant), What Would He Do?

2109 words - 9 pages moral factors and considerations. I would say that it was more immoral to check my status rather than waiting to find out Harvard’s decision. 2. Assess the morality of what the curious applicants did from the point of view of egoism, utilitarianism, Kant’s ethics, Ross’s pluralism, and rule utilitarianism. Egoism From the point of view of egoism, the applicants are morally right as long as their action promotes their long-term interest

Ethics Essay

1427 words - 6 pages , the exporters gained lot on the deal, but at what cost? The children abroad were exposed to the cancer-causing agent Tris. Was this behaviour ethical? If we were to question the organisations would they cite the principle of Egoism, which states “an act is morally right if and only if it best promotes an agent’s long term interests” (Shaw, Barry, Issa, & Catley, 2013)? Upon further questioning there is a danger of them classifying it as

Economic Globlization

1309 words - 6 pages Capitalism and Economic Globalization In a perfect world there would be no hunger, no poverty, and no crime, but no such world will ever exist. There will always be suffering, hurt, anguish, and despair. Yet, shouldn’t we strive to provide a good future for all? This concept of the most amounts of good for the most amounts of people is call Utilitarianism. Contrary to popular belief, the United States doesn’t believe in such a state

Corporata Responsibility

889 words - 4 pages student does not yet know the origins and nature of virtue, ethics, and morals, then the student must accept the teacher's teachings to be true, and the student will still be following an external rule little different than if the student were following a social law or custom. Utilitarianism is one of the most powerful and persuasive approaches to normative ethics in the history of philosophy. Though not fully articulated until the 19th

Related Essays

Utilitarianism, Ethical Egoism, And Moral Relativism

1409 words - 6 pages Utilitarianism, Ethical Egoism, and Moral Relativism Tom Gardner Ethics is a branch of philosophy that attempts to answer the questions; what’s right? What’s wrong? And why? Moral relativism is an ethics position that essentially states that people have disagreeing moral beliefs and therefore you must but tolerant of other's morals. This position leads to the problematic realization that if this is the case there can be no objective moral

Case Study

556 words - 3 pages Case study Introduction As the case stated, Bob which is the senior executive has facing a ethics dilemma circumstance that whether report to the cultural bureau or not, that means whether he would stop the excavation process or not. This essay will apply the normative ethics theories of Egoism, Utilitarianism and Kantian ethics, and what he will do under each theory. Egoism Under the viewpoint of egoism, Bob’s action should motivate his

Business Ethics Review

540 words - 3 pages protect those rights. Adherent: Robert Nozick • Know ethical egoism Everyhting is based on self-interest. • Who are the creators of utilitarianism theory? Jeremy Benthem and John Stuart Mill • Know moral relativism (very similar to utilitarianism) Time & place ethics. No absolute rules. The situation dictates and justifies the actions taken. Week 3 • Know Carr and Drucker perspectives (numerous questions on them) • Drucker's prospective: A) No

Utilitarianism Essay

1828 words - 8 pages Utilitarianism Overview 1. Fundamental Tenets of Utilitarianism 2. Standards of Utility/History of Utilitarianism 3. The Utilitarian Calculus 4. Act and Rule Utilitarianism 5. Criticisms of Utilitarianism 6. Concluding Assessment Basic Insights of Utilitarianism n The purpose of morality is to make the world a better place. n Morality is about producing good consequences, not having good intentions n We