This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Discontent Among The Working Classes Was The Main Reason For The Downfall Of The Tsar In March 1917

1403 words - 6 pages

Discontent among the working classes was the main reason for the downfall of the Tsar in March 1917
• How far do you agree with this statement?

I disagree with this statement because ultimately the people of Russia believed he lacked the qualities of a leader, and as many of the people were poor, hungry, discriminated against, living and working in bad conditions the Tsar was blamed. The turmoil of the country was on Nicholas's shoulders and it was his fault that he had to abdicate in 1917 after his poor work in his role.
Russia entering into World War One in 1914 was, I believe, a key reason why the Tsar was forced to abdicate three years later in 1917. At firstly, ...view middle of the document...

The Tsar could not rule such a vast empire, with so many different nationalities by autocracy. This resulted in him soon losing authority so he enforced a secret police to help control the country. Their methods were brutal; they killed any who opposed the Tsar and his government, dissidents were taken from their families to be jailed or exiled. This made Tsar Nicholas unpopular and he lost the favour of his people with his policy of Russification.
Tsar Nicolas did not handle opposition well, he was violent and threatened by opposing parties including the Kadets wanting a democratic parliament, Social Revolutionaries demanding the land of the nobles be given to the peasants and Communists who were the followers of Karl Marx and divided into the moderate Mensheviks and the more extreme Bolsheviks who wanted a violent proletarian revolution. After 1900 there were many assassinations and protests by these parties, including Bloody Sunday in 1905 and Stolypin in 1911, but the Tsar would always respond with force or only reform his government as little as possible such as the formation of the Duma given next to no power.
The Orthodox Church had always supported the Tsar and his power with the divine right to rule and the Startsy had preached to workers to think of the Tsar as their ‘Little Father’ who as God’s representative on earth was to be a trusted head of the country and church. However when the Tsar allowed Rasputin, the possible member of the Kylysty sect, to have such great presence in parliament, preach false doctrine to the people and even have improper relations with women of the upper classes, their support faltered as they began to question the Tsar’s suitability for ruling and encouraged the workers to do so also.
Nicholas’ reluctance to reform Russia was one of the main reasons he was forced to abdicate in 1917. There remained to be a largely out-dated farming economy but towns in Russia were beginning to industrialise, for example the development of the trans- Siberian railway in 1904. However there was extreme worker poverty and poor living conditions which created a large workforce, disaffected and concentrated in Petrograd which wanted more reasonable working hours and conditions but did not receive them despite their constant strikes. There was also the wealthier middle class, including the factory workers, who were beginning to want a say in the government from 1913. However both of these classes found that the Duma although elected by the people, saw few workers represented but instead a parliament with a majority being of the nobility and who in 1905, if they acted too radically, would instantly be dissolved by Nicholas.
The working classes of Russia had revolted before to no avail in the earlier revolutions of 1905 where they were faced with the extreme brute force and weapons of the Army and the Cossacks. This shows that proletariat revolution had no real effect on the power of the Tsar whilst he still had command...

Other Papers Like Discontent Among the Working Classes Was the Main Reason for the Downfall of the Tsar in March 1917

What Was the Main Reason for Deterioration of Anglo Spanish Relations 1572-88

1030 words - 5 pages flimsy and her advisers would have warned her about what would happen. As we can see, war had never officially been announced before, although many spats had occurred between the nations. Therefore, while there are other factors to take into account, this was definitely the match which lit the fuse of war. While it could be argued that the Treaty of Nonsuch was the main reason for Anglo Spanish relations going sour, the whole year of 1585 could be

How Far Do You Agree That the Limited Appeal of Mazzini's Ideas Was the Main Reason for the Slow Progress of National Unity in the Years 1815-48?

1530 words - 7 pages chance unless they were able to gain the support of the working, middle and upper classes and unite them with a clear goal. This leads onto another very important reason behind the slow progress of the unification of Italy: the fact that the different states lacked a unified goal in their revolutions. The revolts were mainly regionally based, with the revolutionaries fighting for individual goals. For example, the aim of the revolution in Sicily

‘to What Extent Was Superior Military Leadership the Main Reason for the Success of the First Crusade?

997 words - 4 pages ‘To what extent was superior military leadership the main reason for the success of the First Crusade?’ In 1099 the First Crusade had succeeded their objective and captured the Holy City of Jerusalem. The use of military leadership provided by key figures including Bohemond of Taranto, Raymond of Toulouse and Adhemar of Le Puy were considered a main reason for the crusaders success. Due to the failure of the First Wave it was considered by

To What Extent Was Spain’s Financial Weakness the Main Reason for the Success of the Dutch Revolt?

1387 words - 6 pages To what extent was Spain’s financial weakness the main reason for the success of the Dutch revolt? Traditionally revolts correlated with the seasons but the Dutch Revolt resulted not from famine but from the want for religious and political freedom which Philip would not allow. Philip refused to let Protestantism survive in his territory, he envisioned himself as the last Catholic crusader in a Europe falling to the Protestant domino effect

How Far Do You Agree That the Impact of the Second World War Was the Main Reason Why the Position of African Americans Improved in the Years 1945

1461 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that the impact of the Second World War was the main reason why the position of African Americans improved in the years 1945–55? The impact of the Second World War was, without a doubt, crucial in improving the lives of black Americans over the years 1945-55, as it led to federal support of the cause. However, it wasn’t as important as the use of direct action which, for the first time, was able to convert de jure into de

Do You Agree with the View That the Main Reason for Henry’s Failure to Obtain the Annulemnt of His Marriage in the Years 1525-29 Was the Deremined Opposition of Katherine of Aragon?

930 words - 4 pages his aunt, this was not the case. Charles still resented Henry for forming an alliance with France in the field of Golden cloth and therefore losing the Roman Empire as an ally. This decision is the main reason Henry was not able to gain his annulment as he was lost the allegiance of the king that had supreme power over the one man that could grant his marriage to Catherine void; the pope.

Do You Agree with the View Expressed in Source Three That the Diplomatic Situation Was the Main Reason for Henry’s Failure to Obtain an Annulment of His Marriage to Catherine by 1529?

1402 words - 6 pages Do you agree with the view expressed in source three that the diplomatic situation was the main reason for Henry’s failure to obtain an annulment of his marriage to Catherine by 1529? It is obvious that there is more than one reason behind Henry’s failure to obtain an annulment of his marriage to Catherine by 1529. It is however possible to identify that the diplomatic situation did not help his case in getting an annulment and was most

What Was The One Main Reason Why Rome Ceased Being A Republic And Became An Empire

856 words - 4 pages ! ! “After reading 10 papers by other students – one on each of the assigned books – what was the one main reason why Rome ceased being a Republic and became an Empire? What relevance does this have to modern America? Take the “God and Gold” book into account.” The Roman Republic was doing well from its beginning in 510 BC: it developed a good form of government: the senate, legislative assemblies and the executive magistrates. It had won

‘Investment and Support from Foreign Powers Was the Main Reason the Weimar Republic Survived in the 1920s.’ How Far Do You Agree?

752 words - 4 pages ‘Investment and support from foreign powers was the main reason the Weimar Republic survived in the 1920s.’ How far do you agree? During the 1920s, there were many ups and downs for Weimar Germany and to start with they struggled and bounced between governments, especially with hyperinflation in 1923. But with the help of foreign support, Weimar was able to make it to the 1930s. It could be said that the Locarno Pact contributed greatly to the

Why Did Tsarism Survive the Revolution of 1905 but Not That of March 1917?

915 words - 4 pages reformist groups became a lot bigger over the years too big for them all to be hunted and killed by the okrana. This became a huge problem for the Tsar then as he could not control his people making him look weak to the Russian, which in turn as he could not control his people and his people did not want a Tsar he was forced to abdicate. The reason Tsarism did not survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March 1917 was because after 1905 the

How Far Was Lenin Responsible for the Bolsheviks Growing Hold on Power in the Years 1917

1004 words - 5 pages How far was Lenin responsible for the Bolsheviks growing hold on power in the years 1917How far was Lenin responsible for the Bolsheviks growing hold on power in the years 1917-24? Lenin can easily be considered the most responsible character for the growth in Bolshevik power from 1927. However, there are also other factors which without; Lenin would not have been unable to succeed the way he did, such as the Civil War and the failures of other

Related Essays

Do You Agree With The View That The Main Reason For The Emergence Of The Chartist Movement Was Disappointment Among The Working Classes With The Outcome Of The 1832 Reform Act?

854 words - 4 pages Use Sources 4, 5 and 6 and your own knowledge. Do you agree with the view that the main reason for the emergence of the Chartist movement was disappointment among the working-classes with the Outcome of the 1832 Reform Act? There are many factors for the emergence of the chartist movement and disappointment among the working classes is certainly the main factor; however Chartism as an issue is more complex than this and there has been

How Far Was The Weakness Of The Provisional Government The Reason For The Bolshevik Success In October 1917?

1696 words - 7 pages . Moreover, the Provisional government was further weakened by their absence of a strong leader. The dearth of a figure head in the provisional government was a key reason that the Bolsheviks were able to take control of Russia in 1917. Although the provisional government was led by Prince Lvov, he did not play that large a role in making speeches and rallying support for the party. Furthermore, the fact that he was not a working class man made him

How Far Do You Agree That Lenin’s Leadership Was The Main Reason For Why The Bolsheviks Were Able To Seize Power In 1917

1350 words - 6 pages How far do you agree that Lenin’s leadership was the main reason for why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in 1917. Lenin was a very significant figure during the Russian revolution, under his strong leadership and the advice of some of his advisors, Lenin helped the Bolsheviks come to power. However I would not agree that his leadership was the main reason to why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power as factors such as the weakness

Assess The View That The Impact Of The First World War Was The Main Reason For The Booming Economy In The Usa In The 1920’s

1981 words - 8 pages . Interpretation D attributes Andrew Mellon as the main reason for the boom, but as Cannadine is the only one to do so this limits the strength of his argument. The war was the main cause of the boom as it provided the catalyst necessary to start of a chain of events that provided a huge boost to the economy. Without World War I, it could be argued that the American economy would not have boomed to the extent that it did in the 1920’s. One of the main