Cross Functional Team Essay

1571 words - 7 pages

Cross-Functional Teams
Working With Allies, Enemies & Other Strangers

Glenn M. Parker, author of “Cross-Functional Teams”, is a consultant who works with organizations to improve quality and productivity by creating high-performance teams. His training and team-building techniques are becoming the standard for building teams in today’s business place. His ideas, techniques, and advice have been utilized by many companies such as, Merck and Company, Johnson & Johnson, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3M, and AT&T. Parker lives in Lawrenceville, New Jersey with his wife Judy. In his spare time he plays tennis, cheers on the Philadelphia 76ers, and plans his next vacation. His book, ...view middle of the document...

The members of cross-functional teams often function under self direction. They do not require specific directions. However, decision making in a team may depend on majority but is more often being lead by a manger or team leader. As with any team, the leader plays a very important role but leading a cross-functional team is much more difficult. The main reason these kinds of teams are made up is to deal with a complex subject or to resolve a demanding issue. The leader of cross-functional teams must have a diverse technical background to understand the subject and the contributions that are made from its diverse members. Team leaders also need to clarify their team’s authority and to make a decision about key issues. One of the main issues with cross-functional teams is that they do not have the authority to make decisions and implement them. Some teams will take the responsibility of making a decision under the assumption that they automatically are entitled to that kind of authority.
It may be obvious, but an effective team needs to have a clear set of goals, a common purpose, and a clear mission. Because cross-functional teams are different from other teams, setting goals is very critical to its success. “One of the most important roles that clear goals play on a cross-functional team is to reduce the potential of conflicts and minimize past differences among the various disciplines represented on the team.” (p. 81) Members of a team seem to have a clear understanding of what they must deliver but are not sure where his or her piece of the puzzle fits in the overall prospective. Therefore, team members are only concerned with what they have to get done and are less inclined to any commitments toward the total project to make it work. To resolve this issue, the development of a common goal, which all members are willing to accept and support, needs to be thought out carefully and thoroughly that support the objective.
In cross-functional teams, every team member is going to be faced with increased responsibility and is going to wonder how they are personally going to benefit from their participation on the team. Department managers will rarely see their employee’s performance on a team and will not always get a complete view of what they did. It is up to the team leader to be in charge of giving the department manager the input that he or she needs to factor in an employee’s reward. Organizations are then required to shift their individual reward programs to team reward programs. While there will always be a need to reward an individual who goes above and beyond the call of duty, team reward programs have been put in place to be given when the job is complete. Even individual rewards must acknowledge people who are effective team players, offer their expertise, and pitch in and help out when necessary.
Cross-Functional teams provide an excellent opportunity for an employee to demonstrate their unique work...

Other Papers Like Cross-Functional Team

American vs Southwest Essay

625 words - 3 pages Accountability of Front-line employees Functional accountability in American: encourage employees to look out for themselves and avoid recrimination, rather than focusing on their shared goals Cross-functional accountability in Southwest: Institute a “team delay” which allows less precise reporting of the cause of the delays, with the goal of diffusing blame and encouraging learning. 3 Accountability of Field managers Focus on Measurement

Dysfunction In The Workplace Essay

780 words - 4 pages Working in teams: Cross-functional Dysfunction 1. The Executive Director of Operations has assigned Joe Tanney the role of Team Leader for a high priority project. The task is to generate a proposal for streamlining the antiquated blueprint generation process. Each office is at different stages of computerization, with different teams preferring different technologies for particular tasks. This makes everything more complex – from

Team Leadership

1457 words - 6 pages Memorandum TO: FROM: DATE: Re: MGT521/Team Leadership Group/Team Use The organizations that can effectively combine and complement all of the technology and expertise at their disposal, throughout their organizations, are usually the most successful. Cross functional teams help provide a diverse mixture of ideas, creativity, innovation, and experience which often provides the organizations that use them a competitive advantage

Pm Chapter 3 Anwers

831 words - 4 pages : Advantages: • Does not disrupt basic structure of the parent organization. • Concentration project focus. • Projects tend to get done quickly. • Strong cross-functional integration. Disadvantages: • Expensive creation of project manager role and duplication of effort across projects. • Dilemma of what to do with people once the project is over. • Technical expertise limited to the people on the team. • We/the attitude between

Google Case Study

1025 words - 5 pages the cross-functional team at Google, they should strive for socio-emotional cohesiveness. Managers can enhance the socio-emotional cohesiveness by keeping the groups relatively small, striving for a respectable public image to increase status and prestige of belonging, encourage interaction and cooperation, stress members’ common characteristics and interests, and rally the group by pointing out environmental threats (Kreitner & Kinicki 2013

Developing Effective Work Teams

1615 words - 7 pages there are many varied team structures to address these various goals. In reference to business organizations, however, there are four main team structures that are commonly used to complete company tasks: problem solving teams, self managed work teams, cross functional work teams, and virtual teams. Problem solving teams are used to initiate discussions involving ways to improve an organization’s efficiency, quality, and/or work environment. In


760 words - 4 pages lose out.” After Keith presented the group with the problem and the need to reach a compromise solution, their response surprised him: “It’s not our problem,” they replied, “it’s your problem.” Questions: 1. What advice would you give Keith for dealing with the Program Steering Committee? According to the paragraph, this case is a cross functional team. When Keith is a leader of this vehicle program, Keith needs to overcome the challenges

Affecting Change Paper

2193 words - 9 pages this goal the separate departments need to work closely together. Currently, S&F has organized their e-tailing division in a centralized structure, separated by functionality. The best structure to carry out S&F’s vision is a team structure, decentralizing the decision-making process to enhance innovation. Figure Two illustrates the recommended structure for S&F e-tailing division. Using cross-functional team structure to tackle S&F’s strategies

It Project Roles

1125 words - 5 pages , essential cross-training and skills building needs, milestone/goal accomplishments, special planning meetings, organizational sessions, etc. * When requested, provides a performance feedback loop to “Resource Managers” for all project Team members, which can be helpful for the employee performance and personal development review process. * Resolves cross-functional issues at project level, escalates where necessary * Manages project

Making the Tough Team Call

749 words - 3 pages The IMP-2000 software team is a disaster because of the free-riding nature of its team members, the failure to engage within their team and with other IMP participants, failure to diagnose task objectives, and failure to establish functional team norms. The IMP-2000 software team fails to establish a successful team environment resulting in free-riding by team members. Caldwell contributes the most visible effort to the collective output of the

Cross Training

768 words - 4 pages teaching employees how to do other jobs or elements of other jobs within the company or group. With cross-training methods in place, the company or group will always have another employee who can assume the responsibilities, if necessary. Cross-training employees can be quite helpful in a changing business environment, where priorities can shift quickly. By teaching these employees, you are building a stronger team chemistry within your

Related Essays

Thinklink Essay

539 words - 3 pages OrganizationStructure of Cross Funcitonal Assumptions: * Mallory Estrada assumed that she can handle the position immediately without any training and seminars. * Managers at ThinkLink hired Mallory because they believed that Mallory can do the report without any delay. * Mallory doesn’t feel working to a cross functional team that people are opinionated and a positive. * Each opinions were not listening by

Google Case Study

973 words - 4 pages . Find the source And type of the conflict and implement proper resolution strategies.” Lastly HR should appropriately promote perspective. They should “defend stated Preferences, argue for a particular point of view and withstand pressure to change position for another that is not supported by logical or knowledge-based arguments.” (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013, p. 306) 3. How important is trust with this sort of cross-functional team? Explain how

Google Case Study

695 words - 3 pages of cross functional team? Explain how to quickly build trust among cross functional team members who bring a diverse array of backgrounds and perspectives to the table? Trust in teams is one key to success. Trust is what frees employees to put their full energy and commitment to work [ (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013, p. 312) ]. Trust needs to be earned. In order to build trust there are 6 guidelines that should be followed; communication, support

Team Matrix Essay

667 words - 3 pages implement strategies directly. | Self-Managed Work Team | In place of supervisors, these teams work together to manage each other through different tasks: operating procedures, schedules, taking action to solve problems, working with suppliers and customers. | Conflicts often result in uncooperative members, power struggles. High turnover rates within these types of teams. | Cross-Functional Team | Allowing people from diverse areas of expertise