This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Critical Evaluation Essay

1468 words - 6 pages

PY1101 – Writing in Psychology

APA 6th Edition “HOW TO” GUIDE

In Psychology, we use the formatting guidelines as set out in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA), 6th Edition. This is a starter guide to the APA formatting guidelines. This guide is not all-inclusive, but will help get you started for your first assignment. Burton’s ‘An interactive approach to writing essays and research reports in Psychology’ is the best guide to help you with APA formatting and referencing. There are other resources online and in the library also.

Setting up the Format

You need to consider all aspects of the format of the document. The easiest thing to do is ...view middle of the document...

• Avoid the use of direct quotes
• Proofread your work!

Title (on Title page)
• You must have one
• Should summarise the main idea of the paper simply and with style – concise statement of the main topic and should identify the actual variables or theoretical issues under investigation and the relationship between them
• Recommended length 10-12 words

NOTE: For our purposes, your title page should also include your name, student ID number, tutor’s name, tutorial time, and due date. See example below.

|Running head: SHORT PHRASE 1 |
| |
|Title |
| |
| |
|Name: |
|Student ID Number: |
|Tutor: |
|Tutorial: |
|Due Date: |

The critical evaluation should include an introductory paragraph, evaluation of each of the research papers and a concluding paragraph.

Introductory Paragraph:
• Starts on a new page (no heading)
• Describes the research topic(s) being critically evaluated
• Statement of the aims and purpose of the critical evaluation

Critical Evaluation Body:
Each of the research papers should be evaluated separately using the following questions as a guide:
• Identify the source:
o Where was the research paper published?
o When was the research paper published?
o Who was the author of the research paper?
• Analyse the argument:
o Is the argument made by the researchers based on sound theory?
o Have the researchers presented alternative sides of the argument?
o Have any technical terms or jargon been properly defined?
o Does the evidence support the argument?
o Are the hypotheses proposed by the researchers appropriate?
o Are the arguments made by the researchers weak?
• Examine the research methodology
o Who were the participants in this study?
o Does the research include a representative sample?
o How were the participants recruited for this study?
o How was the study conducted?
• Evaluate the results[1]
o Are the results presented clearly?
o Do the results support the hypotheses made by the researchers?
o Are the results interpreted with insight?
• Analyse the conclusions/implications
o Are the conclusions supported by the findings and other evidence?
o Are the conclusions logical or are they beyond the scope of the study?

Concluding paragraph:
• Synthesis of the findings form the critical evaluations.
• Draw a...

Other Papers Like Critical Evaluation

Wwjk Essay

6724 words - 27 pages program services. Attitude toward learning how to conduct an evaluation using the empowerment approach is critical to the success of implementation. 2. Program staff are given an added responsibility, in addition to program implementation. They must also be responsible for conducting the evaluation of program services. This places an added burden on a staff’s already busy schedule. There are two approaches that can ease this burden. First, to the

Critical Thinking Essay

545 words - 3 pages analyses steps to critical thinking, how emotions affect decisions making and critical thinking in professional and societal responsibilities. Critical thinking include knowledge, comprehension, application, synthesis and evaluation. In critical thinking, knowledge includes the most fundamental level of information. In this step, the individual identifies what the source of the knowledge says, the topic and issue. The next step is comprehension

Critical Thinking

633 words - 3 pages Evaluation. Evaluation is to judge and to put in your own words. A great thinker will define, list, and describe what it is their thinking about. He would then explain and summarize it by illustration. He will breakdown his points and modify or rearrange his topic to get to his final thoughts. A critical thinker has good memory and knows a lot of facts. Being a critical thinker is a good trait to have to get you through life. Critical

Preparedness and Mitigation Plan Analysis

741 words - 3 pages the plan, this is where pre incident communication will involve educating the staff and students. The next step of the incident plan involves Incident response evaluation then the ongoing work leads to training, where they train the staff to be ready for a proper incident response. One main exclusion they have left out of the critical incident plan would be the role of the parents in case of an emergency situation. After reading through

Pharmacy Tech

432 words - 2 pages making complexity.992222. Provide the correct code Evaluation and Management for a 35 year old patient seen in the critical care unit for 55 minutes on November 5.992913. Identify the correct Evaluation and Management code for a physician who provided an initial comprehensive preventative examination to a 6 year old.993834. Identify the correct Evaluation and Management code for a previously seen 14 year old receiving a periodic comprehensive

How to Write a Critical Review

670 words - 3 pages relevance of the text to your research or field of study. Part of the process of being critical is to use the information gathered from questioning to understand the topic from different perspectives and in relation to relevant theoretical frameworks in the field. Furthermore, asking the right questions will help you to make links with previous information, develop a position and arguments to support it. What is meant by evaluation? Evaluation is

Public Policy Evalution

2609 words - 11 pages . Policy evaluation is therefore an absolutely critical stage in the policy process whereby we can determine whether a policy’s effects are intended or unintended and whether the results are positive or negative for the target population and society as a whole. In essence, policy evaluation is the process used to determine what the consequences of public policy are and what has and has not been achieved. Elected officials, policy makers, community

Critical Thinking and Ethics, Relateable?

526 words - 3 pages Critical Thinking and Ethics, Relatable? Even though Ethics is the study of the foundational values of a community, critical thinking and ethics are relatable to each other because, both involve the process of evaluation. When practicing good ethics, one must know which behaviors are best for themselves and others, this involves thinking critically. In a statement by Michael Scriven and Richard Paul, “Critical thinking is the

Analysising Current Student Assessment Practices in Clinical Settings

1473 words - 6 pages mentality to include application of critical reasoning (Henderson, 2012). The challenge is to determine criteria and develop a tool with sufficient written, non-task driven standards that can guide clinical instructors in evaluation (Henderson, 2012). Many evaluation tools have been developed in an effort to produce valid and reliable results. Examples of clinical evalution tools are direct observation of patient interaction, simulation, care

Programs and Evaluations

1034 words - 5 pages . With program evaluation, the staff can look at different programs. These determine the strong points, along with the weak points needed to be made stronger. It is very critical in program evaluation to keep things running smoothly and provide the clients along with the community, the program services they need. Both program evaluation and program planning; go hand in hand, so as to make a program efficient and effective

Curriculum Development

4100 words - 17 pages their own health and lifestyles. The purpose of this article is to describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of a multilevel school-based intervention program for middle school students in the Teen Eating and Activity Mentoring in Schools (TEAMS) project. Critical components of success included an interdisciplinary approach, applying available curricula to meet contextual characteristics, and involvement of all stakeholders in planning

Related Essays

Critical Evaluation In Psycology Essay

3080 words - 13 pages Critical Evaluation in Psychology: Critical Evaluation: 1. Introduction 1.1 What will this handout help me with? In Psychology, students are often asked to show evidence of “critical evaluation” in their work. Many students find this difficult, and even those who are told they do it well, often do not understand what it is they are doing! This handout is designed to teach you a little about how to evaluate critically, and what it

Assertive Behavior: Your Perfect Right, A Critical Evaluation

610 words - 3 pages Assertive Behavior: Your Perfect Right, a critical evaluation. The name of this book is “Your Perfect Right” and it was written by Robert E. Albertini and Micheal L. Emmons both with Ph.D. from the Califronia Polytechnia State University in San Luis Obispo, CA. Both authors seem to be working in this book for several time because they have published several editions and had several printings of the book. Also, Robert E. Albertini and

Critical Evaluation Of The Content And Process Of The Writing Of A Text For Children

1748 words - 7 pages Critical Evaluation of the Content and Process of the Writing of a Text for Children Introduction Reading is an important skill that needs to be developed in children, not only because is it necessary for survival in the world of schools, but in adult life as well. (Schulze 2010) The ability to learn about new subjects and find helpful information on anything from health problems to more academic research into science or

Program Evaluation Overview Essay

2263 words - 10 pages of their program evaluations to do just that. Conducted on the bases of the current perspective of the stakeholders, each evaluation centers on the meeting of an organization’s goals and visions. Program evaluations clarify what is and what is needed to achieve benchmarks to attain the goals. The first critical steps are the acknowledgement the requirement of undertaking an evaluation, the proper identification of what needs to be Program