Crime And Deviance Essay

3404 words - 14 pages

Crime and Deviance exam questions
Crime questions – Qu. 1 & 2 – both worth 21 marks.You should spend 30 minutes on each question and each should have a traditional essay structure (include an introduction and a conclusion, at least two sides of the argument, two or more theories, relevant studies and as much evaluation as you can cram in!). You also need to show ‘conceptual confidence’ – this just means that you should make it clear to the examiner that you know and understand the important concepts, e.g. anomie, relative deprivation.Make sure you make reference to the item – both essay questions will have their own item. You can often use the information in the item as a springboard ...view middle of the document...

The Macpherson Report after death of Stephen Lawrence. Canteen culture. * Sentencing – ethnic minority offenders given longer sentences, even when severity of crime and previous convictions taken into account. * Left realism – Lea and Young – Ethnic differences in the crime rates reflect real differences in the levels of offending. Relative deprivation, subculture and marginalisation lead to higher offending rates among ethnic minority groups. Acknowledge that the police often act in racist ways but this cannot fully explain the stats. * Neo-Marxism – the statistics do not reflect reality, they are the outcome of a process of social construction that stereotypes ethnic minorities as inherently more criminal. Gilroy (1982) and Hall (1979) * Could also include Bourgois and reference to the exclusion of ethnic minority groups leading to them setting up alternative economies. * Statistical artefact approach – the higher rates are simply a result of a younger ethnic minority population who are more likely to live in the inner city and other deprived areas. |
Assess sociological views of the relationship between crime and the mass media. | * Explain that the news media gives a distorted picture of crime: over-represent violent and sexual crime, portray criminals and victims as older and more middle class than they actually are, exaggerate police success, exaggerate the risk of victimisation. Cohen and Young – the news is manufactured. Notion of news values. * Media as a cause of crime – horror films (Childs Play and James Bulger killing), violent video games, concerns over lyrics in rap, imitation (copycat crimes), etc. Effects of TV on children. * Fear of crime – media creates unrealistic fear of crime – Gerbner et al, Schlesinger & Tumber. * Moral panics – probably the most substantial part of the essay. Cohen – Folk Devils and Moral Panics – make reference to the mods and rockers example of trouble in British seaside towns in the 60s between the two groups. Know and understand the elements of a moral panic and be able to give modern examples. * Evaluate – modern audiences are much more sophisticated and are able to question what they see, hear and read. Much less susceptible to moral panics, etc. McRobbie and Thornton – moral panics are now so common that they have very little impact. * Could also make reference to new forms of crime – global cyber crime – news types of media have led to new crimes – Cyber trespass, Cyber-deception and theft, Cyber-pornography. |
Assess the usefulness of subcultural theories in explaining subcultural crime and deviance in society today. | This is a relatively straightforward question, which I would probably approach chronologically, making sure that you point out how each theory is still relevant or useful in today’s society and how each theory has grown out of those that came before it. Make sure you point out the subtle differences between the theories as this is where...

Other Papers Like Crime And Deviance

Crime And Deviance Is Normal In Society

2836 words - 12 pages Crime and Deviance is Normal in Society Is crime an abnormal act committed by an abnormal person? Most persons confronted with this particular question would undoubtedly say, ¡§Yes¡¨. They would consider themselves, perhaps not angelic, but certainly law-abiding members of society. However, if these, law-abiding citizens were to focus on the question, their answer might be very different. They might discover that the gene of criminality is in

Evaluate the Usefulness of Labelling Theory to Our Understanding of Crime and Deviance (40 Marks)

1340 words - 6 pages Evaluate the usefulness of labelling theory to our understanding of crime and deviance (40 marks) Synopticity – Crime & Deviance and Theory Labelling theorists such as Becker and Lemert argue that because of the diversity of different values in society, there can never be a universally agreed definition of what constitutes ‘normal’ or ‘deviant behaviour’. What is deviant for one person may not be deviant for another. Labelling theorists

Assess the View That Crime and Deviance Are a Product of the Labelling Process

863 words - 4 pages Assess the view that crime and deviance is a product of the labelling process (21) Some sociologists believe that crime and deviance is a result labelling which is when a label is attached to a person or group of people due to their appearance, sex, ethnicity or other factors. It is also leads individuals to believe that labelling theory can create a self-fulfilling prophecy, which is when the person begins to act according to the label and

Assess Strain Theories As An Explanation Of Crime And Deviance In Contemporary Society.Docx Uploaded Successfully

751 words - 4 pages Assess strain theories as an explanation of crime and deviance in contemporary society The relationship between offending and subculture explains how a situation for example society preventing certain groups particularly working class males from succeeding in terms of material achievement and this creates group response whereby the group rejects the values and of that society and develops alternative values ‘subculture’ and this leads to values

Using Material from Item a and Elsewhere, Asses the View That Crime and Deviance Are the Product of Labelling Processes

1646 words - 7 pages Sociologists use the labelling theory in order to explain why crime and deviance occurs in society. This theory conveys the idea that a act is only criminal or deviant if the act is labelled accordingly, these labels are attached to individuals by those in society who are conformist, therefore they are defining what is deviant and non-deviant. Those who use this theory as an explanation therefore explain crime and deviance in the terms that it

Present An Outline Of Subcultural Theories Of Crime And Deviance And Asses The Values Of These Theories

1852 words - 8 pages hPresent an outline of subcultural theories of crime and deviance and asses the values of these theories. Functionalism is a consensus structuralist theory which sees the source of crime and deviance looted in the structure of the society. Social order is bases on value consensus and social control aims to protect this by controlling the threat posed by crime and deviance. A former functionalist Merton, attempted to explain why deviance

Using Material from Item a and Elsewhere, Assess the View That Crime and Deviance Are the Product of Using Labelling Processes

846 words - 4 pages Ella Duala Topic 2 Essay Sociology 24/09/2014 Using material from item A and elsewhere, assess the view that crime and deviance are the product of using labelling processes (21 marks) Some sociologists believe that the initial cause of crime and deviance is attaching a definition or meaning to an individual or group of individuals, due to their ethnicity, social background, or gender. Many sociologists argue that no act is criminal in

Using Material from Item a and Elsewhere, Assess the Usefulness of Subcultural Theories in Explaining `Subcultural Crime and Deviance' in Society Today. (21 Marks)

782 words - 4 pages To define subculture, it’s where a number of individuals choose to be a part of a separate group that follow distinct norms and values different to those in mainstream society as stated in item A. Subcultures may contain norms and values that would be considered deviant in society and involve criminal activity. In Stanley Cohen’s view the subcultural crime and deviance today results from the inability of lower classes to achieve mainstream

Markedbyteachers

663 words - 3 pages Labelling theory suggests that deviancy is a social process usually related to power differences but it doesn’t explain the causes of crime. It does however explain why some people or actions are described as deviant, and can help in understanding crime and deviance. Becker suggests that there is really no such thing as a deviant act. An act only becomes deviant when others perceive it as such. The application of a label to someone has

Labelling

663 words - 3 pages Labelling theory suggests that deviancy is a social process usually related to power differences but it doesn’t explain the causes of crime. It does however explain why some people or actions are described as deviant, and can help in understanding crime and deviance. Becker suggests that there is really no such thing as a deviant act. An act only becomes deviant when others perceive it as such. The application of a label to someone has

Functionalist Theory of Crime

1254 words - 6 pages Functionalist Theory Of Crime Functionalism (The Consensus structuralism theory) Functionalism is a consensus structuralism theory. Functionalists argue that there is nothing abnormal about deviance, and that it is necessary and normal in all parts of societies performing a positive function. The functions of crime and deviance (DURKEIM)Durkheim has identified a positive and a negative side to crime and deviance, it is positive in which it

Related Essays

Crime And Deviance Essay

1123 words - 5 pages Evaluate Marxist explanations of Crime and Deviance Labelling theory paved the way in understanding how deviance was something defined by social processes. In this way social agencies such as the police defined what was deviant. Marxists took this view even further by examining the power of certain social groups to define deviance and create the laws which secured social conformity. Marxists see crime and deviance as not coming from moral or

Crime And Deviance Essay

827 words - 4 pages Crime and Deviance “It is normal and a sign of a healthy society when crime exists.” States Heiner. It is evident that crime and deviance play an important role in society today and form the “out of ordinary” actions that take place as a subsequence. Crime is a well-known term to many and is believed to involve a breach of rules or laws implemented by attractions or behaviors that violate social norms, for example someone licking the

Functionalist Explanations Of Crime And Deviance

2608 words - 11 pages Functionalist Explanations of Crime and Deviance Functionalist’s believe that shared norms and values are the basis of social order and social solidarity. They see crime and deviance as dysfunctional to society. However, functionalist’s do see some crime as being ‘normal’. Merton took functionalist views further by saying that crime and deviance were a strain between the socially accepted goals of society and the socially approved means

Functionalist Explanations To Crime And Deviance

1655 words - 7 pages Sharna Luscombe Outline and asses the functionalist explanations of crime and deviance. Functionalist ignore deviance; they look at society as a whole and ignore individualism. Functionalism is a structuralist approach (also known as a consensus theory) they believe that individuals are shaped by society and social facts. A limitation of functionalist is that they ignore certain groups within society, such as women and people with