Courtroom Work Group
There are many parts of the courtroom and the process of convicting a criminal. The courtroom work group has a major role in convicting and finalizing a case. In the courtroom work group, there are three groups of people that hold the entire courtroom together. Without the work group, the courtroom would not flow, and coming to a conclusion to the case would not be as easy. The work group is made up of the Judge, the Defense Counsel and the Prosecution. They work together to reach a result, in the case by staying in contact on a daily basis. There are many roles in the work group, and if they are not all followed through with then the results could be different than ...view middle of the document...
For example, in 1992, Texas, Tarrant two attorneys were killed and another injured, the bailiff is there to prevent those types of incidents.
Then we have the local court administrator; they facilitate the courts to function in a smooth way and court management. The court reporter and court clerks, the court reporter, type’s everything that is said in court, the courts want to keep accurate accounts of what is said, not only that, they used the transcripts for certain court cases as examples. Then the courts handle the courts pleas, motions and maintain a record of all the cases. All these people cross path each and every day in the courts, they ensure that all parties are being respected and that no law is being abused by either party. The only thing I would change in the handling of the data by local authorities and the prosecuting office, they should ensure that all data is obtained legally.
The Role of the Prosecution
The role of the prosecutor boils down to three main goals. The prosecutor is responsible for investigating the crime committed, decide whether or not to proceed with legal proceeding, and finally, if legal proceedings are instigated to appear in court.
The prosecutor has more contact with everyone involved with the crime than maybe anyone else. He or she has contact with the person suspected of the crime, the victim, witnesses, and also works alongside the police to investigate and ensure the correct person is held accountable.
Once all the evidence is gathered up, he or she will decide whether or not to legally pursue it in a court of law. If a prosecutor takes on a case without the proper investigation and gathering of evidence it will only reflect poorly on them once the case appears in court. Most prosecutors will not take a case unless there is a substantial amount of evidence to ensure a conviction. If the crime is a minor offense, and the suspects admit guilt, the prosecutor will impose the fine ("American Bar Association", 2014).
The criteria for taking a case has to be a fair balance between doing a proper investigation to ensure you have enough evidence to prosecute and making sure the courts are not overwhelmed with cases that should never be pursued. Making the criteria more stringent would possibly benefit the criminal by prosecutors and police having to produce too much evidence in order to go to trial. Making the criteria less stringent would overwhelm the court system with too many cases and cost the tax payer and put a burden on the state trial budget.
The Criminal Justice Funnel
Our justice system is sometimes referred to as “Assembly line justice." The case load of a typical judge is so overwhelming that the judge does not have the ability to give the necessary amount of time to each defendant that comes before the court. This is the origin of the funnel effect in our criminal justice system. Every day we see traffic stops, citations, and arrests being made, but not all of them spend a...